What The Supreme Court's Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act Could Mean For Franchises
Monday, July 2, 2012

Several news stories around the web today discuss the United States Supreme Court's Ruling on the 2010 Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and what it could mean for franchised businesses.  As I said yesterday, I sincerely hope these gloomy predictions are not accurate.  Franchising has started to rebound as an industry, and I would hate to see that growth stymied.  After all, franchises account for a very large percentage of all small businesses around the country, and small business is the engine on which this country's economy runs. 

  • From Nasdaq / Dow Jones: Restaurants, Retailers Disappointed With Health-Care Mandate. Quotes National Retail Federation's Chief Executive, Matthew Shay, as saying "as it stands, the law wrongly focuses more on penalizing employers and the private sector than reducing health costs. Although the Court upheld the law's constitutionality, many problems remain: It penalizes employers too much; it doesn't do enough to reduce the cost of health care; and it is unreasonably complicated and difficult to implement and administer."
  • From the Washington Post, an op-ed piece by Fastsigns CEO Catherine Monson: Why the health-care ruling may stop franchises from opening new stores, creating new jobs.  According to Ms. Monson, "the law will deter growth by unintentionally discouraging franchisees from owning and operating multiple locations, creating a competitive disadvantage for our franchisees who do own more than one or two locations (and who may want to open additional stores), and barriers to entrepreneurs who are looking to capitalize on the franchise business model to grow their business and hire more workers." 
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins