September 16, 2021

Volume XI, Number 259

Advertisement

September 16, 2021

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

September 15, 2021

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

September 14, 2021

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis
Advertisement

Wisconsin's Proposed Senate Bill Can Have Far-Reaching Implications for Wisconsin Municipalities Creating Tax Incremental Financing Districts

What is a Tax Incremental Financing District?

Tax Incremental Financing Districts (TIDs) are one tool that cities and villages have utilized to spur economic development. TIDs provide an alternative to municipal financing for funding public works projects, transfer the financial risk for development to developers, and provide developers financial incentives to construct projects that would not be economically feasible without the TID.

Wisconsin Statute § 66.1105 governs TIDs and allows communities to create a defined tax district whose taxes, among other uses, can fund cash grants to developers of land within the district by either distributing funds to the developer at the outset of a project or distributing funds annually by the "pay-as-you-go" approach.

The "pay-as-you-go" approach, which is increasingly utilized by Wisconsin cities and villages, operates on the assumption that development will add taxable value to a district. An initial base value of the property in the district is established at the commencement of the TID. The taxes generated from property after the development is undertaken minus the base value taxes yields the net incremental revenue ("NIR"). The NIR is the amount available to repay the city or village and developer for certain initial project costs for or directly related to development within the TID. To avoid financial short falls, development agreements often have a developer guaranty of increased value that obligates the developer to pay the shortfall between the actual NIR and projected NIR.

What Are The Proposed Changes?

While there are many advantages to TIDs, there is concern that TIDs increase the tax burden on citizens within the community. Governor Tony Evers' proposed budget, introduced as 2019 Senate Bill 59 on March 1, 2019, attempts to address this concern by proposing three changes to future TIDs. Those changes are:

  1. Capping the developer allocation to 20% of the NIR (currently, there is no statutory limit to the amount of NIR that can be allocated to a developer),

  2. Requiring TID project plans to include "stress tests" to test the "TID's finances and feasibility under different economic situations, including a slower pace of development and lower rate of property value growth than expected in the TID," and

  3. Allowing cities and villages to transfer TID money to its general fund if the "city or village erroneously report a higher value increment for its TID by an aggregate amount of at least $50 million."

What Are The Implications to Municipalities?

  • Existing TIDs would not be affected, but future TIDs would be subject to the new Senate Bill.

  • If passed, the 20% cap on developer allocation may make some smaller project-specific TIDs unfeasible for the developer and require a shift from the trend of cities and villages creating smaller project-specific TIDs to establishment of larger TIDs in which the 20% amount payable to a developer would still be sufficient incentive to attract some developer's participation in a TID.

  • The new "stress test" requirement will add administrative processing time in requiring evaluation of the TID under less favorable economic conditions during the planning phase.

Municipalities should be aware of these potential changes for TIDs currently under consideration.

©2021 von Briesen & Roper, s.cNational Law Review, Volume IX, Number 70
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

About this Author

Alan Marcuvitz Eminent Domain Attorney
Attorney

Alan Marcuvitz is a Shareholder in the Milwaukee office of von Briesen & Roper, s.c. He is recognized as one of Wisconsin’s preeminent attorneys in the fields of eminent domain and real property taxation, based on his extensive experience in both trial and appellate courts. Many of his Wisconsin Supreme Court cases are cited with the following representative cases being cited frequently:

  • Warehouse II, LLC v. State Dept. of Transp., 2006 WI 62, 291 Wis. 2d 80, 715 N.W.2d 213
  • Metropolitan Holding Company vs. Board of Review of the City of Milwaukee...
414-287-1401
Smitha Chintamaneni, Von Briesen Roper Law Firm, Milwaukee, Real Estate, Construction and Tax Law Attorney

Smitha Chintamaneni is a Shareholder and has represented businesses, governmental entities, and individuals in eminent domain, commercial real estate, leasing, taxation, and construction matters for over 15 years.

Notably, she acts as one of the attorneys for the Village of Mount Pleasant surrounding the Foxconn project, where she represents the Village on all eminent domain matters. Smitha also acts as outside counsel for several Wisconsin based corporations in their transactional real estate matters. She has also served as counsel for the Milwaukee County Zoo, as defense counsel...

414-287-1515
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement