Intellectual Property

Intellectual property disputes take place on a daily basis in a variety of venues. From an employee’s right to a patent of company-developed products to patent wars between international companies for illegal use of a product/logo, the National Law Review is a great resource for updates on all things IP. The site covers litigation at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the  Patent Trial and Board Appeals (PTAB), as well as cases in front of the International Trade Commission (ITC) for international patent disputes. The National Law Review covers cases heard by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), or appeals which are now sitting in front of the patent-board on Inter partes review (IPR). Additionally, the National Law Review covers cases and decisions of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

Copyrights, patent infringement claims, trade secrets, false advertising claims, unfair competition, and intellectual property laws which govern patent-litigation, are all areas which the National Law Review covers, in detail for readers. Patent disputes don’t only occur in the United States. When international countries including the United Kingdom, Brazil, China, India, and the European Union get involved, international laws are also taken into consideration by the PTO. Additionally, information on how to obtain patent protection internationally is also available on the National Law Review.

Intellectual property news on the National Law Review spans from topics including biosimilars, domain name registration, generic top-level domains (gTLDs), drug patents, non-compete agreements, trade secrets, and other industry-related battles which ensue, are covered on the site. Visitors can read about the latest legislation, laws, and news, as it relates to patents and intellectual property in general. Further, visitors to the National Law Review are going to find the latest stories and litigation as it unfolds in front of patent courts across the land. From email and data retention policies, patent disputes over medical devices, cloud computing and artificial intelligence the National Law Review has the details and expert intellectual property litigation legal analysis readers count on.

For hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Custom text Title Organization Sort descending
Feb
19
2015
Life Sciences: Protecting the Crown Jewels
Apr
3
2013
“Innovation Meets Insight:” An Intellectual Property Expert’s Take on the Revised America Invents Act (AIA)
Jun
2
2009
Licensing From Universities: Identifying And Managing Unique Issues
Aug
28
2012
The Federal Circuit Will Decide if a Damages Trial or Decision on Willfulness Is Required Before a Judgment of Patent Infringement Can Be Appealed Sills Cummis & Gross P.C.
Oct
17
2015
Third Circuit Wades Into Intersection of IP and Antitrust: First gloss on FTC v. Actavis focuses on non-monetary branded-generic deals Sills Cummis & Gross P.C.
Oct
3
2023
New York Limits Employer Invention Assignment Provisions Sills Cummis & Gross P.C.
Jun
29
2012
Willful Infringement Will Now Be Harder to Prove Sills Cummis & Gross P.C.
Oct
1
2012
Trademarks And Bankruptcy: Seventh Circuit Provides Lifeline For Trademark Licensees Confronting Licensor Bankruptcy Sills Cummis & Gross P.C.
Dec
13
2011
Strategies For Intellectual Property Licensees Who Depend Upon The Use Of Complementary Trademarks When A Licensor Files For Bankruptcy Sills Cummis & Gross P.C.
Jul
26
2012
The Latest, but Perhaps Not Last, Word on the Pleading Requirements for Direct and Indirect Infringement Sills Cummis & Gross P.C.
May
21
2012
New Jersey Rolls Out its Trade Secrets Act: What Employers Need to Know Sills Cummis & Gross P.C.
Jun
3
2012
Five Traps for the Unwary Licensee Sills Cummis & Gross P.C.
Oct
9
2012
The Federal Circuit Continues to Make Inequitable Conduct More Difficult to Prove Sills Cummis & Gross P.C.
Nov
13
2012
The Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit Does Not Dive into the Turbulent Waters of the Supreme Court’s Stream of Commerce Debate Sills Cummis & Gross P.C.
Mar
13
2013
Updates on Three Important Issues: Family and Medical Leave Act Developments, Arbitration Agreements and Trade Secret Protection Sills Cummis & Gross P.C.
Nov
10
2011
Social Media Perils: A Primer for Businesses Much Shelist, P.C.
Mar
18
2020
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Releases Notice on Effects of Coronavirus Much Shelist, P.C.
Jun
18
2010
Don't Gamble with Internet Sweepstakes Much Shelist, P.C.
Aug
26
2010
Patent Precautions: Avoiding Errors in Inventorship Much Shelist, P.C.
Aug
9
2011
Well-Drafted Patent Claims Foreclose Competition Much Shelist, P.C.
Oct
24
2011
U.S. Patent Reform in 2011: President Signs the America Invents Act Much Shelist, P.C.
Sep
21
2011
Q&A for Employers: Understanding the Impact of Illinois' New Civil Union Act Much Shelist, P.C.
May
31
2009
United States Patent and Trademark Office Publishes New Rules on Patent Applications Much Shelist, P.C.
Aug
6
2010
What Lies Ahead? Business and Legal Issues in the Coming Decade Much Shelist, P.C.
Aug
14
2009
Protecting Your IP in a Troubled Economy: A Modest (and Cost-Effective) Proposal Much Shelist, P.C.
Nov
22
2009
Non-Competition Agreements: Despite the Myths, Often a Powerful Method of Protecting Your Business Much Shelist, P.C.
May
27
2009
Credit Card Companies Are Not Liable for Contributory Copyright Infringement Clark & Trevithick
May
27
2009
The Financial Consequences of Using Unlicensed Software Clark & Trevithick
Jun
30
2009
Ninth Circuit Rules on Copyright Act -- Attorney's Fees Clark & Trevithick
Jul
7
2009
Summary of Digital Legislation Affecting Colorado Fairfield and Woods P.C.
Jul
24
2009
Is Your Intellectual Property (IP) ‘Insured’? 10 Tips to Protecting Your IP Investment Fairfield and Woods P.C.
Feb
28
2023
French Insider Episode 20: Growing Your Business in America: The Story of Qobuz and Its Growth in Music Streaming with Dan Mackta [PODCAST] Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jan
17
2013
In a Rarely-Seen Joint-Effort in the Competition Arena, the DOJ and the USPTO Unite in Issuing a Policy Statement on Remedies Involving Standard Essential Patents Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jan
25
2013
Thin Copyrights - Protected But Not Infringed Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Apr
19
2023
Design Patent Protection for Computer Generated Icons and Graphical User Interfaces Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jun
22
2023
Congress Proposes National Commission to Create AI Guardrails Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jun
28
2023
How Quickly are Judge Albright Patent Cases Going to Trial? Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jul
15
2013
The Architecture of Copyright Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
May
8
2019
Converting an IPR Loss into a District Court Win Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
10
2023
Axonics, Inc. v. Medtronic, Inc. Nos. 2022-1532, 2022-1533, (Fed. Cir. August 7, 2023) Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
18
2023
Federal Circuit Clarifies Standards to Establish Nexus Between Objective Evidence and Non-Obviousness, and to Establish Copying in Medtronic et al. v. Teleflex Innovations Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
21
2023
“Comparison Prior Art” Must Be Tied to the Same Article of Manufacture as That Claimed Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Nov
18
2013
No Avoiding BPCIA (Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act) For Biosimilars: No Patent Declaratory Judgment Action Before Biosimilars Application Is Filed Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Feb
8
2014
Bitcoins and Liability in the Wake of Recent Silk Road Arrests Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
31
2024
Highlights of Revised Regulations for Implementing Patent Law of China Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Feb
13
2020
Machine Learning Patentability in 2019: 5 Cases Analyzed and Lessons Learned Part 1 Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Apr
22
2020
The Federal Circuit Reconsiders the Inherent Distinctiveness of Color Marks in In re Forney Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
May
19
2020
COVID-19 Web-Based IP Platform to Facilitate Connections Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jun
27
2014
USPTO Issues Preliminary Examination Instructions in Light of Alice Corp. - U.S. Patent And Trademark Office Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Oct
10
2016
Supreme Court and the Lanham Act: Lee v Tam Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins