June 2, 2023

Volume XIII, Number 153

Advertisement

Timothy Z. LaComb

Mr. LaComb is an Associate in MoginRubin LLP’s San Diego office and his practice focuses on antitrust, unfair competition, and complex business litigation, particularly as they relate to mergers and acquisitions. Prior to joining MoginRubin LLP, Mr. LaComb was an Associate at Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP where he helped secure several multi-million-dollar recoveries for shareholders in merger-related class action litigation.  Through his extensive experience in complex litigation, he has developed an expertise and proficiency in electronic and other discovery-related issues.  Mr. LaComb also worked as a Transaction Associate at David F. Grams & Associates, S.C. immediately after law school. He is admitted in both California and Wisconsin. Tim earned his J.D. from the University of Wisconsin School of Law, where he was on the Dean’s List and a member of the UW Law Moot Court Board, and earned his B.A. in Economics from the University of San Diego.

Articles in the National Law Review database by Timothy Z. LaComb

Pages

The National Law Review recognizes MoginRubin with a 2022 Go-To Thought Leadership award for their expertise in the field of antitrust law. Throughout the year, Mogin Rubin attorneys have provided extensive insight into large corporate mergers and antitrust cases, including the Kroger/Albertsons merger, the T-Mobile/Sprint merger, the Spirit/Frontier merger, and notable anti-competitive mergers in the defense industry. Authors include (but are not limited to): Dan Mogin, Jonathan Rubin, Timothy Z. LaComb, Kristy F. Greenberg, and Jennifer M. Oliver.

Timothy Z. LaComb an unfair competition litigator, at Mogin Rubin is a 2019 National Law Review Go-To Thought Leader for his analysis of antitrust and competition investigations by the Department of Justice and California regulators in particular.  Mr. LaComb analyzes a wide range of competition situations ranging from laws affecting clients such as college athletes and media companies, to Department of Justice (DOJ) investigations into malware testing standards, and National Law Review readers appreciate his depth of  knowledge and insight into these vital antitrust areas.