D.C. Circuit (incl. bankruptcy)

The District of Columbia Court of Appeals is the Federal District Court in Washington, DC. The circuit is often referred to as “the District”, “Washington”, and often referred to by its initials, D.C., and is the capital of the United States.

The District of Columbia is governed by the US Constitution, which gives it the jurisdictional power to Congress, so it is not governed by any one state in the United States. The Federal District courthouse sits in the District of Columbia City Hall Building at Judiciary Square. The DC Court of Appeals and the  Superior Court of the District of Columbia make up the local court system in that district.

“The court of last resort” is often what the District of Columbia is referred to, as parties should try to have their cases settled in their respective state or circuit courts. The court has the authority to hear all final orders, specified interlocutory orders, judgments, and decisions which are made by certain government agencies in D.C. The Court is also permitted to hear cases which need to have cases which present questions of law presented by the Supreme Court heard. Given its power through Congress, the court is authorized to review proposed rules from trial courts and develop its own rules for proceedings which go through the court.

Currently there are eight associate judges and the circuit judge which are hearing cases which come through the District of Columbia circuit. At this level, judges are appointed to 15-year terms after being nominated by the President and appointed by the US Senate. Currently, the chief justice of the circuit is Anna Blackburne-Rigsby, who was initially appointed during the Clinton administration as an associate judge.

Unlike other circuits, the District of Columbia circuit issues MOJs, or memorandums of justice in cases where decisions do not result in new law. MOJs are also issued in cases where cases don’t decide on an important issue/federal question, or in cases which don’t interpret a statute or concept, which hasn’t yet been decided on. The court also publishes opinions in cases where both litigants and the trial court, create a new law, interpret statutes, or interpret important concepts in the legal system.

The National Law Review covers a broad range of MOJ findings as well as case opinions which are decided by the District of Columbia circuit. We cover: federal questions, retaliation claims, cybersecurity claims, Agency news, labor and employment, and other important federally driven cases. The National Law Review also focuses on appointments, and general news and elections , bankruptcy, tax cases, and other cases which go through the circuit’s system.   

Custom text Title Organization
Jul
5
2016
Transmission Planning and Construction Right of First Refusal Ruled Unduly Discriminatory, Not Mobile-Sierra Protected McDermott Will & Emery
Jul
5
2016
Supreme Court Agrees to Review D.C. Circuit’s Decision That Former NLRB Acting General Counsel Served in Violation of Federal Law Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
Jul
1
2016
D.C. Circuit Questions FERC's Income Tax Allowance Policy Van Ness Feldman LLP
Jul
1
2016
U.S. Supreme Court Declines to Review DOL Home Care Rule Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
Jun
30
2016
D.C. Circuit Upholds FERC’s NEPA Analysis in Sabine Pass and Freeport LNG Projects Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP
Jun
27
2016
SEC Prevails in Regulation A+ Litigation Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jun
27
2016
Securities and Exchanges Commission Prevails in Regulation A+ Litigation Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jun
21
2016
Employer Attacks NLRB’s New Joint Employer Standard on All Fronts in Court Brief Jackson Lewis P.C.
Jun
21
2016
Supreme Court to Hear Appeal of NLRB’s Former Acting General Counsel’s Decisions Following Nomination Jackson Lewis P.C.
Jun
20
2016
D.C. Circuit Upholds FCC’s Net Neutrality Rules Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Jun
17
2016
DC Circuit Court Rejects States’ Challenge of Blue Sky Preemption Under Regulation A+ Katten
Jun
16
2016
D.C. District Court Invalidates Payment of Cost-Sharing Subsidies, Setting Up Additional Legal Tests for Affordable Care Act Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
Jun
15
2016
Clock Winds Down On SEC Resource Extraction Disclosure Rule Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
Jun
14
2016
The DC Circuit Affirms the FCC’s Open Internet Rules Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP
May
24
2016
D.C. Federal Court Strikes Down ACA Cost Sharing Reduction Payments McDermott Will & Emery
May
18
2016
Another Unexpected Fork in Road to Clean Power Plan ArentFox Schiff LLP
May
16
2016
House of Representatives v. Burwell: Another Blow to Obamacare Foley & Lardner LLP
May
13
2016
A District Court Just Dealt a Blow to the ACA. Employers, Don’t Get Excited! Jackson Lewis P.C.
May
4
2016
Are Private Development Projects Covered by Prevailing Wage Laws? Polsinelli PC
Apr
25
2016
Orchestra Left Without Chair When Music Stops: Another Independent Contractor Misclassification Foley & Lardner LLP
Apr
22
2016
DC Court Finds CID Issued Without Statutory Authority “A Bridge Too Far” Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP
Apr
21
2016
Employees or Independent Contrators: Ties Go to the Runner and the NLRB Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Apr
18
2016
D.C. Circuit Panel Questions Constitutionality of the CFPB Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Apr
13
2016
DC Circuit Questions Constitutionality of CFPB Structure Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP
Apr
7
2016
DC Circuit Order Raises Stakes in CFPB Appellate Matter Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP
Apr
2
2016
Employer’s Careful Drafting of Warning Document Causes Court of Appeals to Overturn NLRB Violation Finding Jackson Lewis P.C.
Mar
24
2016
D.C. District Court Examines Employer’s Burden to Prove Failure to Mitigate Damages in Employment Discrimination Action Mintz
Mar
21
2016
Coalition For Affordable Drugs v. Acorda Therapeutics: Institution Granted Where SEC Filing Found to be Printed Publication IPR2015-01853 Faegre Drinker
Mar
14
2016
Timing Is (Almost) Everything: FERC Implements D.C. Circuit Guidance on NEPA Review of Multiple Pipeline Construction Projects McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
8
2016
Browning-Ferris Appeals NLRB’s Landmark Joint Employer Decision to U.S. Court of Appeals Jackson Lewis P.C.
Mar
7
2016
Liquid Natural Gas Exports Begin as NGOs Press Climate Change Challenges Steptoe & Johnson PLLC
Mar
1
2016
Flytenow v. FAA Decision: Flight-Sharing Requires FAA Part 119 Certification Katten
Feb
18
2016
Washington DC Issues New Exempt Reporting Adviser Rule for Venture Capital Funds Stark & Stark
Feb
10
2016
Supreme Court Stays Clean Power Plan ArentFox Schiff LLP
Feb
10
2016
D.C. District Court Invalidates Important FHWA Exemptions to “Buy America” Requirement Covington & Burling LLP
Feb
5
2016
Adventures in Joint Employment: the Browning-Ferris Saga Continues with an Appeal to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals Mintz
Feb
1
2016
Browning-Ferris Appeals ‘Joint Employer’ Decision to U.S. Court of Appeals Jackson Lewis P.C.
Jan
26
2016
NLRB’s New Joint-Employer Standard To Be Tested In Federal Court Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Jan
25
2016
When Seemingly Indefinite Leave and Non-Cooperation Makes Leave of Absence Unreasonable Foley & Lardner LLP
Jan
8
2016
District Courts Stay TCPA Cases in Light of Spokeo, Gomez, and D.C. Circuit Appeal Faegre Drinker
Jan
6
2016
Industry Groups to DC Court: Hang Up on FCC Expanded TCPA Rules Mintz
Jan
5
2016
Alaska Presses D.C. Court of Appeals to Reject Trust Acquisitions in Alaska Dickinson Wright PLLC
Dec
29
2015
D.C. Circuit Leaves US EPA’s Mercury Rule in Place During Remand Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Dec
29
2015
The Assignment of Visiting Federal Judges, and a Little Wisconsin Judicial History Foley & Lardner LLP
Dec
15
2015
Idaho Bankruptcy Court Finds Under Equities of Particular Case, Pre-Substantive Consolidation Transfers May Be Like “Gap Period” Transfers That Cannot Be Avoided Holland & Hart LLP
Dec
15
2015
Let Chips Fall: When Is An Impasse An Impasse? Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Dec
8
2015
D.C. Circuit Resuscitates Elimination of Companionship and Domestic Service Exemptions for Third-Party Employers Poyner Spruill LLP
Dec
4
2015
D.C. Circuit: When Government Is Silent, There Is No FCA Liability For Contractor’s “Objectively Reasonable” Interpretation Of Ambiguous Contract Provision Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
4
2015
D.C. Circuit Finds for FCA Defendant Where Liability Premised on Interpretation of Undefined, Ambiguous Term Holland & Hart LLP
Nov
30
2015
D.C. Circuit Ruling Yet Another Reminder of NLRB’s Handbook Initiative Jackson Lewis P.C.
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins