July 5, 2020

Volume X, Number 187

July 03, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

July 02, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

D.C. Circuit Leaves US EPA’s Mercury Rule in Place During Remand

On December 15, 2015, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia rejected challenges by energy industry groups and several states that are seeking to scrap US EPA’s Mercury and Air Toxics Standards (“MATS”) final rule.  White Stallion Energy Center, LLC v. EPA, Case No. 12-1100.  The Court remanded the rule to US EPA for further consideration, but without vacatur, allowing the rule to remain in effect until it is revised by the agency.

The ruling comes after the June 29, 2015 decision by the US Supreme Court (a 5-4 decision) holding that US EPA interpreted 42 U.S.C. §7412(n)(1)(a) unreasonably in finding costs irrelevant to its decision to regulate power plants, and remanding the case to the Court of Appeals.  The Court found that “The Agency must consider cost—including, most importantly, cost of compliance—before deciding whether regulation is appropriate and necessary.”

On November 20, 2015, US EPA issued a proposed supplemental finding in response to the Court’s decision that indicated “a consideration of costs does not alter the EPA’s previous determination that it is appropriate to regulate air toxics, including mercury, from power plants.”  The supplemental finding indicates that it “does not affect power plants’ compliance obligations, which began in April of this year, or the steps that many plants across the country have already taken and are continuing to take to meet those obligations by installing controls and technologies to reduce toxic air emissions.”  The supplemental finding was published in the Federal Register on December 1, 2015, and provides that public comments will be accepted through January 15, 2016.

The Court’s order noted that US EPA has represented that it is on track to issue a final finding by April 15, 2016.

© Copyright 2020 Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLPNational Law Review, Volume V, Number 363


About this Author

Gary L. Pasheilich, Squire Patton Boggs, Clean Water Attorney, Environmental Law

Gary Pasheilich is a member of the Squire Patton Boggs Environmental, Safety & Health Practice Group and has diverse experience with complex civil and administrative matters involving federal and state air, water, and hazardous waste laws. Gary counsels clients on environmental compliance, due diligence, permitting and enforcement, and has substantial experience with major federal environmental statutes including the Clean Air Act , Clean Water Act, National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (...

614 365 2730