Antitrust Law

HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot

In the United States, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and the  Department of Justice (DOJ) regulate antitrust and trade-regulations laws. From guaranteeing market monopolization doesn’t polarize the market, to regulating ‘no-poach’ antitrust agreements between employers, there are many regulations that govern this area of law. The National Law Review covers cases and news from the United States and internationally.

Joint ventures, structural issues, mergers, comparative advertising, price-fixing schemes, discrimination, and distribution constraints are among the different types of news readers will find on The National Law Review. The Antitrust Division of the DOJ highly regulates insider trading, company-organizational schemes, and monopolization by major companies, to regulate a fair and balanced industry for all companies in a given industry.

The International Trade Commission (ITC) regulates international antitrust laws, alongside other international government agencies. Illegal market trades, global competition law, international trade agreements, The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), and Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), are all governed by the US and international government agencies, to guarantee fair dealings internationally. The National Law Review has regular updates on NAFTA negotiations as wells as news regarding the TPP and the United States' role in the treaty.

The Committee of Foreign Investments in the United States is also in charge of the regulation of antitrust agreements and mergers and acquisition deals between US and international businesses. The CFIUS governs investments between two American companies, as well as US-based and international companies who contract in a purchase-sale agreement to determine fairness, and proper balance in negotiations between companies on the international level.

Due to the different laws in the US and around the world, there are many government bodies that regulate and govern the antitrust and trade regulation industry. Not only to maintain a fair balance between trade partners, but also to ensure market monopolization does not occur, allowing major corporations to eliminate smaller, local, and international competitors in their niche. The National Law Review keeps readers up to date with expert legal analysis on these issues.

National Law Review Antitrust TwitterFor hourly updates on the latest news about Antitrust & Trade Regulation law, regulations, and legislation, be sure to follow our Antitrust X (formerly Twitter) feed and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Recent Antitrust, Mergers, FTC & Unfair Competition News

Title
Custom text Organization Sort descending
Dec
30
2020
Brexit: A First Look at UK-Mexico Trade Continuity Agreement's Relevant Issues Foley & Lardner LLP
Mar
5
2015
Takeaways From the FTC, DOJ Workshop on Health Care Competition Foley & Lardner LLP
Apr
8
2015
Peeking Behind the Curtain: Macroeconomic Insight into Manufacturing Foley & Lardner LLP
Apr
15
2015
Buying Someone Else’s Headache – Top Five Supply Chain Pitfalls To Consider When Expanding Through Acquisition Foley & Lardner LLP
Jun
22
2015
Clarity Put on Hold as FTAIA Conflict/Confusion Continues- Foreign Trade Antitrust Improvements Act Foley & Lardner LLP
Aug
25
2021
The Pros and Cons of Blockchain in Supply Chain Foley & Lardner LLP
Sep
27
2021
Is it Unfair to Restrict Unfair Competition? The FTC May Soon Make Their Stance Known Foley & Lardner LLP
May
17
2022
Foley Automotive Report: May 17, 2022 Foley & Lardner LLP
Jan
24
2017
CFIUS and the New Trump Administration: Your Top Ten Questions Answered Foley & Lardner LLP
May
1
2017
“Individualized Proof of Harm” Required in Robinson-Patman Secondary-Line Claim Prevents Class Certification Foley & Lardner LLP
Dec
12
2022
Global M&A Trends: A Wider Slowdown but Still on Track to Surpass Pre-Pandemic Activity Foley & Lardner LLP
Jan
26
2023
What the FTC’s Proposed Ban on Employee Noncompete Agreements Could Mean for the Technology Industry Foley & Lardner LLP
Aug
31
2018
Free Trade Agreement Between U.S. and Mexico Sounds Good, but What Was Really Agreed Upon? Foley & Lardner LLP
Sep
24
2018
Antitrust Scrutiny of No-Poaching Agreements Continues to Pick Up Steam Foley & Lardner LLP
Feb
23
2023
Retraining the Acquisition Model: How to Approach the Risks and Rewards of Deals With Artificial Intelligence Targets Foley & Lardner LLP
Nov
27
2018
Solving the U.S.-China Trade Deficit with Chinese IPOs Foley & Lardner LLP
Apr
4
2023
Arizona House Introduces Potential General Franchise Law Foley & Lardner LLP
Jul
1
2019
FTC Steps up Enforcement Against False Claims of Participation in the EU-U.S. Privacy Shield and Other International Privacy Frameworks Foley & Lardner LLP
Jul
18
2023
Cultural Alignment in Mergers and Acquisitions: The Key to Successful Integration Foley & Lardner LLP
Jul
27
2023
Third Circuit Rules Texas Auto Dealer Incentive Programs Must Use Reliable Standards Foley & Lardner LLP
Jan
13
2020
The Cost of a Handshake: Federal Case Highlights the Trouble and Expense of Litigating Unwritten Agreements Foley & Lardner LLP
Jan
22
2020
FTC and DOJ Issue Draft Vertical Merger Guidelines Foley & Lardner LLP
Mar
16
2020
FTC and Pennsylvania AG Sue to Block Merger of Philadelphia Healthcare Systems Foley & Lardner LLP
Jan
17
2024
What Every Multinational Company Needs to Know About…The Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act (Part I) Foley & Lardner LLP
Feb
21
2024
Practical Considerations for a Private Equity Buyer Contemplating an Acquisition of an ESOP-Owned Company Foley & Lardner LLP
Mar
15
2024
A New Regulatory Landscape for Consumer Products Containing Button Cell or Coin Batteries Foley & Lardner LLP
Mar
27
2024
Supply Chain Transparency – Are You Ready? Foley & Lardner LLP
Jul
27
2021
Foley Weekly Automotive Report July 27: Truck Shortages, COVID, and Self-Driving Software Foley & Lardner LLP
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins