Civil Procedure

The National Law Review covers a broad range of cases, litigation, news, and stories, as they relate to civil procedure in the United States and internationally. The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Criminal Rules of Civil Procedure, guide litigation at civil and criminal levels in the United States. Further, standard federal and state courts also have general rules of civil procedure which serve as guidelines of what the court expects, how parties should interact in proceedings, and how evidence should be presented in cases. The National Law Review provides in depth analysis of the rules of procedure, and how they possibly affect the outcome of different cases at the state and federal level.

When adjudicating civil lawsuits, parties must act accordingly, not only at trial, but also in the presentation of evidence, witness statements, and how they interact outside of court. All of this is guided by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The National Law Review not only publishes updates to those rules as they are updated by the courts, but also covers topics including: issues of discovery, the complexities which e-discovery present today, use of expert testimony at trial, hearsay evidence, and other areas of trial/party interactions, which are governed by the Rules of Procedure.

The Civil Rules of Procedure also dictate the venue and jurisdiction which courts have to hear certain cases. The National Law Review covers topics including personal, subject-matter, and party jurisdiction, which dictate which courts parties can file a lawsuit it. Jurisdictional requirements further govern whether or not a case can be brought at the federal level, or first has to go through state courts. The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure serve as guides in filing a civil or criminal lawsuit. Visitors to the National Law Review can find topics which cover constitutional issues, such as Article III (standing requirement), what judicial sanctions are imposed for violating the rules of procedure, how spoliation of evidence is dealt with, introducing digital evidence, and even introduction of social media evidence, as it is so highly used in today’s digital world.

The National Law Review covers cases, news, and stories which deal with the rules of procedure, litigation, and updates to the Federal Rules, which may impact parties to a lawsuit, and where they can bring a lawsuit based on those rules.

 

For hourly updates on the latest in legal, legislation, government regulation & compliance, litigation, court procedures, and corporate law news, be sure to follow the National Law Review Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

 

Custom text Title Organization Sort descending
Nov
20
2009
Double Jeopardy? Citizen Suit May Proceed Despite Government Enforcement Action Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
Aug
19
2012
The Sixth Circuit rules on the deadline for completing action on a CAFA appeal and whether a third-party defendant may remove under CAFA Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
Jan
11
2013
Court Rules in Favor of Employers in Class Action Group Rating Case Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
Mar
19
2020
Origins of the Force Majeure Clause and Impossibility of Contractual Performance Defense Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
Aug
23
2010
Regulation by Litigation: Fourth Circuit Weighs in on Nuisance Suits Involving Air Emissions Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
Aug
13
2012
The Eighth Circuit holds that stipulations filed contemporaneously with a complaint limiting damages to an amount below CAFA’s jurisdictional threshold may be used to defeat CAFA jurisdiction Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
Jan
18
2023
DOJ Clears the Way for USPS to Deliver Abortion Drugs by Mail Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
Feb
23
2023
Cosmetic Regulations Get a Facelift Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
Aug
13
2012
The Seventh Circuit holds that 28 U.S.C. § 1332(d)(9) relating to securities class actions is an exception to CAFA jurisdiction, not a prerequisite Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
Sep
9
2012
United States Supreme Court Grants Certiorari to Determine Whether a Llitigant can Purposely Limit the Amount in Controversy to Defeat CAFA Jurisdiction Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
Apr
21
2016
Top of mind: Four eDiscovery Trends to Watch in 2016 Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
Nov
2
2016
Employment Litigation and Mental Health Experts: Those Allegations Are Just Crazy… Bring in An Expert? Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
Dec
22
2009
State Board Policy 4373 Leaves Little "Wiggle Room" for Student Discipline Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
Jun
28
2010
How Will West Virginia Supreme Court's Decision Affect Insurance Consumers? Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
Aug
5
2010
Patient Protection and Afforable Care Act Increases Potency of Qui Tam Suits Under the False Claims Act Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
Oct
7
2011
Pair of Ohio Supreme Court Decisions Enforce Limitation of Action Clauses Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
Jan
16
2012
CAFA Connection: Cases Decided Under the Class Action Fairness Act Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
Jun
8
2012
How The White House’s Endorsement of Same-Sex Marriage Affects Employment Law Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
Aug
14
2012
Ninth Circuit reverses a remand order where the district court erroneously refused to consider jurisdictional evidence submitted by the removing party Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
Mar
29
2013
Judge McMonagle Awards Damages in San Allen Employment Litigation Case Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
Jul
30
2016
Deciding Your Entitlement To Public Records May Have Just Gotten Less Expensive Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
Dec
20
2021
OSHA COVID-19 Vaccine Mandate is Back Following Sixth Circuit Decision Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
May
25
2023
Sixth Circuit Rejects Two-Step Collective Certification Process in FLSA Suits Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
Aug
15
2012
Federal district court in NY holds CAFA’s Home State Exception is not jurisdictional, and CAFA imposes no deadline for raising the exception when an action is originally filed in federal court Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
Aug
9
2012
A California District Court Holds that Defendant’s Proof of Amount in Controversy Falls Short of Both the Preponderance of the Evidence and the Legal Certainty Standards Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
Aug
15
2012
Third Circuit vacates order granting the defendant leave to appeal an order remanding a class action case to state court where post-remand the state court dismissed the case Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
Oct
31
2012
W.Va. Supreme Court Affirms Award of Attorneys’ Fees and Expenses Against WVDEP In Surface Mine Board Appeals Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
Mar
6
2010
Tips for School Administrators on How to Handle "Sexting" Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
Aug
11
2010
Best Pleading Practices in Federal Court Following Twombly and Iqbal Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
Oct
7
2010
West Virginia needs Substantive Right of Appeal Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
Aug
9
2012
The Second Circuit Interprets the Securities Exception to CAFA Jurisdiction and Remands a Case to State court Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
Mar
7
2010
Pay When Paid Clauses - Sword & Shield Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
Aug
10
2012
A Federal District Court in Florida Awards Attorneys’ Fees to the Plaintiff Based on the Defendants’ Improvident Removal of the Case Pursuant to CAFA More than Two Years After the State Court Complaint was Filed Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
Aug
16
2012
Northern District of Illinois Holds that Plaintiffs’ Proposal of a Consolidated Trial May Trigger Federal Jurisdiction Under CAFA as a Mass Action Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
Feb
25
2011
Seeking CAFA Clarity: A Summary of Recent Case Law Addressing Challenges to Jurisdiction Under the Class Action Fairness Act Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins