Civil Procedure

The National Law Review covers a broad range of cases, litigation, news, and stories, as they relate to civil procedure in the United States and internationally. The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Criminal Rules of Civil Procedure, guide litigation at civil and criminal levels in the United States. Further, standard federal and state courts also have general rules of civil procedure which serve as guidelines of what the court expects, how parties should interact in proceedings, and how evidence should be presented in cases. The National Law Review provides in depth analysis of the rules of procedure, and how they possibly affect the outcome of different cases at the state and federal level.

When adjudicating civil lawsuits, parties must act accordingly, not only at trial, but also in the presentation of evidence, witness statements, and how they interact outside of court. All of this is guided by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The National Law Review not only publishes updates to those rules as they are updated by the courts, but also covers topics including: issues of discovery, the complexities which e-discovery present today, use of expert testimony at trial, hearsay evidence, and other areas of trial/party interactions, which are governed by the Rules of Procedure.

The Civil Rules of Procedure also dictate the venue and jurisdiction which courts have to hear certain cases. The National Law Review covers topics including personal, subject-matter, and party jurisdiction, which dictate which courts parties can file a lawsuit it. Jurisdictional requirements further govern whether or not a case can be brought at the federal level, or first has to go through state courts. The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure serve as guides in filing a civil or criminal lawsuit. Visitors to the National Law Review can find topics which cover constitutional issues, such as Article III (standing requirement), what judicial sanctions are imposed for violating the rules of procedure, how spoliation of evidence is dealt with, introducing digital evidence, and even introduction of social media evidence, as it is so highly used in today’s digital world.

The National Law Review covers cases, news, and stories which deal with the rules of procedure, litigation, and updates to the Federal Rules, which may impact parties to a lawsuit, and where they can bring a lawsuit based on those rules.

 

For hourly updates on the latest in legal, legislation, government regulation & compliance, litigation, court procedures, and corporate law news, be sure to follow the National Law Review Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

 

Custom text Title Sort descending Organization
Aug
11
2022
JPML Declines to Create MDL for Data Breach Cases Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Oct
28
2021
Judge Albright Issues Updated Standing Order for Patent Cases McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
7
2012
Judge Clamps Down on DOJ Efforts to Apply U.S. Law Abroad Ifrah Law
Jan
16
2014
Judge Duffey Pares Plaintiff's Requested Legal Fees After Finding Defendant in Contempt of Consent Order in Patent Case Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Apr
25
2024
Judge Finds Demand Futility Is A "Live" Issue Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
Dec
2
2011
Judge in Citigroup Case has Bucked Trend of Rubber Stamping SEC Settlements Center for Public Integrity
Oct
9
2013
Judge Jones Certifies Class Action In Southwest Virginia Natural Gas Case Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Nov
10
2021
Judge Leonard P. Stark Will Bring a Wealth of Patent Experience to the Federal Circuit Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Mar
29
2013
Judge McMonagle Awards Damages in San Allen Employment Litigation Case Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
Dec
21
2011
Judge Per Curiam to the Rescue: Ryland Enterprise v. Weatherspoon Hunton Andrews Kurth
Aug
21
2015
Judge Posner Goes Where No Judge Has Gone Before - Internet Sources as Evidence Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Aug
27
2014
Judge Rules Choice Of Law Waives California Corporate Securities Law Claim Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
Apr
2
2024
Judge Rules Plaintiff Lacked Standing to Claim Damages Whilst Still Holding Securities Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
Aug
17
2013
Judge Scheindlin Issues Important New Guidance on Preservation and Sanctions Analysis in Sekisui Am. Corp. v Hart Faegre Drinker
Sep
6
2012
Judge Was Right to Reject Plea Deal in Child Porn Case that Included Appellate Waiver Ifrah Law
Dec
18
2013
Judge Wilson Dismisses Claim of Defectively Manufactured Tree Stand - Western District of Virginia Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Dec
5
2013
Judges Lobbying the Supreme Court on Jurisdiction? Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Jan
1
2012
Judges’ New Scrutiny of Settlements May Make Life Difficult for Defendants Ifrah Law
Apr
6
2022
Judgment Creditors Beware: Moving For Contempt May Be Within Reach, But Difficult To Grasp Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jun
26
2015
Judgments Entered by Confession are Enforceable in New Jersey Stark & Stark
Mar
16
2013
Judicial Approval No More? The Days of Judicially Scrutinized FLSA Settlements May Be Drawing To a Close Barnes & Thornburg LLP
May
29
2020
Judicial Council Amends Prior Emergency Rule to Adjust Land Use Litigation Deadlines Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
Apr
7
2020
Judicial Council of California’s Emergency Orders Affecting Employment Actions Jackson Lewis P.C.
May
5
2011
Judicial Economy Is Not a Trump Factor in Deciding Transfer Motions McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
6
2015
Judicial Internet Research: Does the First SCOTUS Decision of OT 2015 Bode Ill for Dr. Posner? Foley & Lardner LLP
Sep
16
2015
Judicial Internet Research: Dr. Posner Faces Peer Review Foley & Lardner LLP
May
3
2023
Juridical Link Doctrine Rejected By Sixth Circuit Robinson & Cole LLP
Sep
6
2019
Jurisdictional Lessons from Mt. Gox Cryptocurrency Litigation Bilzin Sumberg
Mar
28
2023
Jurisdictional or Nonjurisdictional? That Is the Question: SCOTUS Today Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
Sep
2
2015
Jurors Use Social Media To Research Case Details [VIDEO] IMS Legal Strategies
Mar
31
2011
Jury Trials In New Jersey: The Impact of Modern Technology on Jury Requests to “Read-Back” Trial Testimony Sills Cummis & Gross P.C.
Sep
1
2015
Just How Scary is the SEC? “Fear” Not Sufficient Grounds to Duck Administrative Subpoena Mintz
Apr
1
2022
JUST RELEASED: 2022 Q1 AI/Biometric Litigation Trends Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Sep
19
2013
Just What Does CalPERS Believe Anyway? Re: “Investment Beliefs” Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
Apr
3
2021
Justice Alito’s Concurrence in Facebook–Context Matters! Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins