Civil Procedure

The National Law Review covers a broad range of cases, litigation, news, and stories, as they relate to civil procedure in the United States and internationally. The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Criminal Rules of Civil Procedure, guide litigation at civil and criminal levels in the United States. Further, standard federal and state courts also have general rules of civil procedure which serve as guidelines of what the court expects, how parties should interact in proceedings, and how evidence should be presented in cases. The National Law Review provides in depth analysis of the rules of procedure, and how they possibly affect the outcome of different cases at the state and federal level.

When adjudicating civil lawsuits, parties must act accordingly, not only at trial, but also in the presentation of evidence, witness statements, and how they interact outside of court. All of this is guided by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The National Law Review not only publishes updates to those rules as they are updated by the courts, but also covers topics including: issues of discovery, the complexities which e-discovery present today, use of expert testimony at trial, hearsay evidence, and other areas of trial/party interactions, which are governed by the Rules of Procedure.

The Civil Rules of Procedure also dictate the venue and jurisdiction which courts have to hear certain cases. The National Law Review covers topics including personal, subject-matter, and party jurisdiction, which dictate which courts parties can file a lawsuit it. Jurisdictional requirements further govern whether or not a case can be brought at the federal level, or first has to go through state courts. The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure serve as guides in filing a civil or criminal lawsuit. Visitors to the National Law Review can find topics which cover constitutional issues, such as Article III (standing requirement), what judicial sanctions are imposed for violating the rules of procedure, how spoliation of evidence is dealt with, introducing digital evidence, and even introduction of social media evidence, as it is so highly used in today’s digital world.

The National Law Review covers cases, news, and stories which deal with the rules of procedure, litigation, and updates to the Federal Rules, which may impact parties to a lawsuit, and where they can bring a lawsuit based on those rules.

 

For hourly updates on the latest in legal, legislation, government regulation & compliance, litigation, court procedures, and corporate law news, be sure to follow the National Law Review Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

 

Custom text Title Organization
Mar
1
2014
Limiting Statutes of Limitations in Arbitration Agreements Jackson Lewis P.C.
Feb
28
2014
Second Circuit Reinforces Tough Predatory Pricing Pleading Standards—Can Anyone Properly Plead a Predatory Pricing Claim? Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Feb
28
2014
Former Lance Armstrong Endorsement of Supplement Company FRS Doesn’t Support False Advertising Class Action, California Federal Court Rules Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Feb
28
2014
Non-Practicing Entities' (NPE) Tough Talk Promising Litigation Against Comcast Becomes Self-fulfilling Prophecy Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Feb
28
2014
Strategy of Offering Refunds to Moot Class Actions Gains Traction Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Feb
28
2014
France Finally Embraces Class Actions McDermott Will & Emery
Feb
27
2014
Copyright Registration Does Not Trigger the Statute of Limitation for a Co-Authorship Claim: Brownstein v. Lindsay McDermott Will & Emery
Feb
27
2014
Ninth Circuit Once Again Affirms That Malicious Actions To Destroy A Competitor Do Not State An Antitrust Claim Unless Accompanied By Injury To Competition Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Feb
27
2014
Paper Company, Arguing that FERC (Federal Energy Regulatory Commission) Lacks Jurisdiction over Demand Response, Files Motion to Dismiss FERC Manipulation Action Bracewell LLP
Feb
27
2014
Can a Consumer Products Company Moot Class Actions by Offering a Refund? Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Feb
26
2014
Declaratory Judgment Dismissed Without Prejudice Does Not Bar Later IPR (Inter Partes Review): Clio USA, Inc. v. The Procter and Gamble Company McDermott Will & Emery
Feb
26
2014
Expert Testimony Not Required for Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress Claim, Tennessee Court Rules Jackson Lewis P.C.
Feb
26
2014
California Courts Tackle Meaning of “May” Under the Finance Lenders Law Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
Feb
25
2014
When 30 Days Just Isn’t Enough: The Ninth Circuit Rules that Defendants’ Right to Remove May Not be Limited to 30 Days Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Feb
25
2014
Forum Selection Clauses and Non-Compete Agreements Faegre Drinker
Feb
25
2014
Delaware Chancery Court Declines to Apply Offer-of-Judgment Rule in Appraisal Proceedings Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Feb
24
2014
De Novo Review of District Court Claim Construction Is Here to Stay—For Now McDermott Will & Emery
Feb
24
2014
Lighting Ballast v. Philips – Federal Circuit Will Maintain De Novo Review of Claim Construction Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Feb
24
2014
Lightning Ballast II – Judge Lourie Tries to Get to “The Facts of the Matter” Re: Intellectual Property Litigation Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Feb
21
2014
2, 4, 6, 8…NFL Cheerleaders Not “Rah Rah-ing” About Pay Rate Mintz
Feb
21
2014
Rule 30(b)(6) Depositions: Who Speaks for the Company? Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Feb
20
2014
A Virginia Bill to Expedite Judicial Decisions in Civil Cases Odin, Feldman & Pittleman, P.C.
Feb
19
2014
Comity and Commonality: A Tale of Two Identical Class Actions Brought By Forum-Shopping Plaintiffs’ Counsel Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Feb
19
2014
Georgia Jury Left To Decide If Camouflage Patterns Have Specific Protectable Elements Re: Georgia IP Litigation Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Feb
18
2014
The Supreme Court of Canada Seeks to Rein-In Court Costs: A New Approach for Summary Judgment Motions in Ontario Dickinson Wright PLLC
Feb
18
2014
North Carolina Court Discusses Application of Res Judicata in Quasi-Judicial Land Use Proceedings Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Feb
17
2014
Following Daubert Hearing, Federal Court Refuses to Certify Proposed Medical Monitoring Class Beveridge & Diamond PC
Feb
15
2014
Cathay Pacific Airlines Settles Freight Shipping Price-Fixing Class Action McDermott Will & Emery
Feb
15
2014
Ten Years Later: North Carolina Catches Up With Rule 702, Adopts Daubert and Bids Adieu to Howerton Re: Expert Witness Testimony Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Feb
13
2014
Ninth Circuit Concludes That Common Issues Do Not Predominate Where Retailer’s In-Store Signs and Oral Sales Statements Place Each Putative Class Member’s Exposure to Misleading Statements in Doubt Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Feb
11
2014
Virgin v Jet Airways: English Courts Cannot Undermine EPO (European Patent Office) Patent Grant McDermott Will & Emery
Feb
11
2014
Maryland District Court Denies Certification of TCPA (Telephone Consumer Protection Act) Class Action Because Class Members Were Not Ascertainable Faegre Drinker
Feb
11
2014
Federal Circuit Clarifies Standard for Recovery of E-Discovery Costs Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP
Feb
11
2014
Denying Motion for Conditional Certification, NY District Court Says FLSA (Fair Labor Standards Act) Notice and Opt-In Process Is Not A Discovery Device Jackson Lewis P.C.
Feb
11
2014
Proper Rebuttal Experts Armstrong Teasdale
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins