Intellectual Property

Intellectual property disputes take place on a daily basis in a variety of venues. From an employee’s right to a patent of company-developed products to patent wars between international companies for illegal use of a product/logo, the National Law Review is a great resource for updates on all things IP. The site covers litigation at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the  Patent Trial and Board Appeals (PTAB), as well as cases in front of the International Trade Commission (ITC) for international patent disputes. The National Law Review covers cases heard by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), or appeals which are now sitting in front of the patent-board on Inter partes review (IPR). Additionally, the National Law Review covers cases and decisions of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

Copyrights, patent infringement claims, trade secrets, false advertising claims, unfair competition, and intellectual property laws which govern patent-litigation, are all areas which the National Law Review covers, in detail for readers. Patent disputes don’t only occur in the United States. When international countries including the United Kingdom, Brazil, China, India, and the European Union get involved, international laws are also taken into consideration by the PTO. Additionally, information on how to obtain patent protection internationally is also available on the National Law Review.

Intellectual property news on the National Law Review spans from topics including biosimilars, domain name registration, generic top-level domains (gTLDs), drug patents, non-compete agreements, trade secrets, and other industry-related battles which ensue, are covered on the site. Visitors can read about the latest legislation, laws, and news, as it relates to patents and intellectual property in general. Further, visitors to the National Law Review are going to find the latest stories and litigation as it unfolds in front of patent courts across the land. From email and data retention policies, patent disputes over medical devices, cloud computing and artificial intelligence the National Law Review has the details and expert intellectual property litigation legal analysis readers count on.

For hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Custom text Title Sort descending Organization
Mar
28
2024
AI has Achy Breaky Time in Tennessee (Protecting Artists’ Voices) Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Aug
11
2021
AI in Biotech and Synthetic Biology: What Can Be Protected? What Should Be Kept Secret? Mintz
Aug
24
2023
AI In the Workplace: Navigating a New Technological Frontier (US) Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Feb
6
2024
AI is Fueling a Major Contract Dispute in the Music Industry: Why it Matters for Your Business Polsinelli PC
Jun
27
2023
AI Takes the Stand: Speaking of Litigation Podcast – Episode 2 Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
Aug
15
2023
AI v. IP: Potential Fiasco Looming with New Wave of Litigation Against AI Platforms ArentFox Schiff LLP
Oct
16
2023
AI Versus Westlaw Copyright Bellwether Hurtles Toward Jury as Summary Judgment Largely Denied Vedder Price
Feb
15
2024
AI-Assisted Innovation: Navigating the USPTO's Latest Guidelines Blank Rome LLP
Feb
14
2024
AI-Assisted Inventions: Are They Patentable? Who is the Inventor? Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Feb
21
2024
AI-Assisted Inventions: Is There a Duty to Disclose the Use of AI? Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Oct
30
2023
AI-Based Patent Applications: Recent History and the Future Mintz
Jun
8
2023
AI: The Washington Report — National Priorities for Artificial Intelligence Mintz
Jun
13
2023
AI: The Washington Report — New AI Disclosure Bill and AI Strategic Plan Update Mintz
Dec
29
2016
AIA Diligence Standard Does Not Require Daily Work on Invention McDermott Will & Emery
Jul
28
2017
AIA Does Not Override 28 USC § 1447(d) Reviewability Bar McDermott Will & Emery
Jul
7
2016
AIA Estoppel Provisions Clarified: America Invents Act Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Feb
11
2022
AIA Patent Claims Canceled by Pre-AIA Application Interference Finnegan
Dec
18
2015
AIA Review Confirmed Constitutional Armstrong Teasdale
Jul
16
2021
AIA § 3(n) Effective Filing Date Provisions Part I: A Look at PGR Eligibility Finnegan
Feb
3
2013
AIA’s (American Invents Act's) False Marking Retroactive Provision is Constitutional McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
24
2014
AIPLA Announces New Executive Director Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Apr
7
2020
AIPLA’s Updated Model Patent Jury Instructions Address “Clear and Convincing” Standard of Proof & Streamline Case Citations Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Nov
5
2020
Air France Restrained From Using Song that Infringes "Love in the Air" K&L Gates
Nov
4
2015
Air Liquide Large Industries U.S. LP v. Praxair Technology, Inc., Institution Denied Based on Insufficient Evidence of Publication IPR2015-01074 Faegre Drinker
Mar
27
2014
Airport Restaurant Service Provider Seeks to Ground Hijacked URL Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Oct
30
2017
Airtight Victory for RV Seal Supplier in Appeal to Overturn Dismissal: Lifetime Indus., Inc. v. Trim-Lok, Inc. McDermott Will & Emery
Apr
29
2014
Airwatch Succeeds in Remand Motion of Good Technology Claims: Good to Go Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Sep
9
2012
Akamai Technologies, Inc. v. Limelight Networks, Inc.: Federal Circuit Makes Proving Induced Infringement Easier Armstrong Teasdale
Sep
2
2015
Akamai Technologies, Inc. v. Limelight Networks, Inc.: Federal Circuit brings defines liability for “joint enterprises” Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Feb
6
2017
AKAMAI V – “How To” Induce Infringement of a Method of Treatment Claim Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
May
15
2015
Akamai v. Limelight: Federal Circuit Maintains “Single Entity” Status Quo Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Sep
6
2012
Akamai/McKesson Decided– Implications for Personalized Medicine Patents Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Sep
26
2012
Akami/McKesson Decision Re-defines Induced Infringement Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Aug
28
2015
Akebia Therapeutics, Inc. v. FibroGen, Inc.: Statute Permits Domestic Discovery for Foreign Opposition Proceedings McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
13
2014
Aker Biomarine AS and Enzymotec Ltd. and Enzymotec USA, Inc. v. Neptune Technologies and Bioressources Inc.: Denying Motion to Compel Additional Discovery IPR2014-00003 Faegre Drinker
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins