Intellectual Property

Intellectual property disputes take place on a daily basis in a variety of venues. From an employee’s right to a patent of company-developed products to patent wars between international companies for illegal use of a product/logo, the National Law Review is a great resource for updates on all things IP. The site covers litigation at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the  Patent Trial and Board Appeals (PTAB), as well as cases in front of the International Trade Commission (ITC) for international patent disputes. The National Law Review covers cases heard by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), or appeals which are now sitting in front of the patent-board on Inter partes review (IPR). Additionally, the National Law Review covers cases and decisions of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

Copyrights, patent infringement claims, trade secrets, false advertising claims, unfair competition, and intellectual property laws which govern patent-litigation, are all areas which the National Law Review covers, in detail for readers. Patent disputes don’t only occur in the United States. When international countries including the United Kingdom, Brazil, China, India, and the European Union get involved, international laws are also taken into consideration by the PTO. Additionally, information on how to obtain patent protection internationally is also available on the National Law Review.

Intellectual property news on the National Law Review spans from topics including biosimilars, domain name registration, generic top-level domains (gTLDs), drug patents, non-compete agreements, trade secrets, and other industry-related battles which ensue, are covered on the site. Visitors can read about the latest legislation, laws, and news, as it relates to patents and intellectual property in general. Further, visitors to the National Law Review are going to find the latest stories and litigation as it unfolds in front of patent courts across the land. From email and data retention policies, patent disputes over medical devices, cloud computing and artificial intelligence the National Law Review has the details and expert intellectual property litigation legal analysis readers count on.

For hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Custom text Title Organization Sort descending
Sep
7
2017
Mallinckrodt v. Praxair – Innomax Method Patent Fails Alice/Mayo Test Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Mar
4
2022
China’s Supreme People’s Procuratorate Released 4 Typical Cases of Enforcement of Criminal Intellectual Property Laws Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Mar
13
2022
Europol: More Than Half of Counterfeits Originate in China Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Apr
1
2022
China’s National Intellectual Property Administration Releases Second Batch of Guiding Cases of Administrative Enforcement Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Mar
1
2012
Last Chapter In The “Corn Wars” Or Just The Latest? Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Apr
25
2022
China’s National Intellectual Property Administration: Crackdown on 482,000 malicious registered trademarks in 2021, Rejection of 12,200 Trademark for Malicious Hoarding Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
May
23
2022
China’s National Intellectual Property Administration Approves Establishment of First 3 Foreign Patent Agencies in China Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jun
23
2022
China’s National Intellectual Property Administration Sanctions 3 Trademark Firms for Forging Evidence Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Aug
3
2022
NY Attorney Suspended for Filing Over 18,000 U.S. Trademark Applications for Chinese Agents Without Proper Review Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Oct
30
2022
China to Add Statement of Use Requirement for Trademarks? Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Nov
21
2022
China’s Supreme People’s Court Releases Draft Judicial Interpretation of Anti-Monopoly Civil Procedures for Comment Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Dec
1
2022
NetEase Wins 50 Million RMB & Injunction on Appeal in Minecraft Infringement Litigation at the Guangdong Higher People’s Court Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jan
16
2023
Chinese Invention Patent Grants Up 14.7% in 2022 YoY; Utility Model Grants Down 10.1% Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Feb
16
2013
USPTO Publishes Extensive Examination Guidelines for 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Feb
17
2023
Mattel Defeats Chinese Trademark Applicant Attempting to Register “Barbie” for Services Including Artificial Insemination (For Animals) Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Apr
11
2023
China’s Supreme People’s Court Releases Annual Report of the Intellectual Property Court for 2022 Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Apr
20
2013
SAP v. Versata: First Covered Business Method Patent Trial and Appeal Board Trial Tests New AIA (America Invents Act) Trial Provisions Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
May
2
2023
China’s National Intellectual Property Administration Releases Top 10 Patent Reexamination Invalidation Cases of 2022 Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
May
24
2013
CLS Bank International v. Alice Corporation: Poison Apple Re: Patent Litigation Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jun
13
2013
Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Covered Business Method: Versata Patent Claims Unpatentable Under 35 U.S.C. § 101 Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jul
10
2013
Supreme Court Decision Myriad Brings Out Its “Reserve Claims” To Challenge Ambry Re: Patent Eligibility Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jan
8
2019
USTPO Releases Proposed Revised Section 101 Eligibility Guidelines Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jul
31
2013
Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Grants Motion for Early Termination of Proceeding Before Covered Business Method Trial Institution Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Sep
3
2013
Dr. Watson, Genomics and the Law Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Oct
12
2013
Cert. Denied in Intema Ltd. v. PerkinElmer, Inc. Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Mar
28
2016
PTAB hits delete key on Intellectual Ventures patent for electronic content distribution Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
May
17
2019
Is the “Blocking Patent” Doctrine Part of the Obviousness Analysis? Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
May
24
2019
Bipartisan “Draft Bill” to Amend ss. 100, 101 and 112 Released for Comment Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Oct
27
2023
4.5-Year Prison Sentence in Shanghai for Counterfeiting of Anchor Butter Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Apr
18
2016
Limelight Networks v. Akamai Tech. – Supreme Court Cert. Denied Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jan
23
2014
Why the Bilski Analytical Framework is Fundamentally Flawed, and Why Diehr’s 101 Test is Better Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Feb
12
2014
Patent Office Board Clarifies Petitioner Role for Single Petition by Several Companies Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Aug
12
2019
Genotyping Patent Claims Do Not Escape The Reach of s. 101 Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Mar
3
2014
Amici Curiae Brief of Microsoft, Adobe and Hewlett-Packard: Alice Corp’s Patent Does Not Claim a Technological Innovation Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
May
23
2016
Due May 24 — Comments On Improving Patent Quality Metrics Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins