Intellectual Property

Intellectual property disputes take place on a daily basis in a variety of venues. From an employee’s right to a patent of company-developed products to patent wars between international companies for illegal use of a product/logo, the National Law Review is a great resource for updates on all things IP. The site covers litigation at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the  Patent Trial and Board Appeals (PTAB), as well as cases in front of the International Trade Commission (ITC) for international patent disputes. The National Law Review covers cases heard by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), or appeals which are now sitting in front of the patent-board on Inter partes review (IPR). Additionally, the National Law Review covers cases and decisions of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

Copyrights, patent infringement claims, trade secrets, false advertising claims, unfair competition, and intellectual property laws which govern patent-litigation, are all areas which the National Law Review covers, in detail for readers. Patent disputes don’t only occur in the United States. When international countries including the United Kingdom, Brazil, China, India, and the European Union get involved, international laws are also taken into consideration by the PTO. Additionally, information on how to obtain patent protection internationally is also available on the National Law Review.

Intellectual property news on the National Law Review spans from topics including biosimilars, domain name registration, generic top-level domains (gTLDs), drug patents, non-compete agreements, trade secrets, and other industry-related battles which ensue, are covered on the site. Visitors can read about the latest legislation, laws, and news, as it relates to patents and intellectual property in general. Further, visitors to the National Law Review are going to find the latest stories and litigation as it unfolds in front of patent courts across the land. From email and data retention policies, patent disputes over medical devices, cloud computing and artificial intelligence the National Law Review has the details and expert intellectual property litigation legal analysis readers count on.

For hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Custom text Title Organization
Feb
4
2014
U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) Now Requires Satisfaction of the “Technical Prong” for Licensing-Based Domestic Industries: Certain Computers and Computer Peripheral Devices, and Components Thereof, and Products Containing the Same McDermott Will & Emery
Feb
4
2014
Is “Insolubly Ambiguous” the Correct Standard to Determine Compliance with Sec 112? McDermott Will & Emery
Feb
4
2014
PTO Litigation Center Report – February 4, 2014 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Feb
4
2014
Supreme Court Rules Patentee Must Prove Infringement in Declaratory Judgment Action Brought by Licensee Vedder Price
Feb
4
2014
Be Careful What You Draw: Prosecution History Estoppel Applies to Design Patents - Pacific Coast Marine v. Malibu Boats, LLC McDermott Will & Emery
Feb
4
2014
Judge Batten Grants Summary Judgement to Indiana Mills & Manufacturing against Pediatric Medical Devices Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Feb
3
2014
Negation of Motivation To Combine Defeats Obviousness - Institut Pasteur & Universite Pierre Et Marie Curie v. Focarino McDermott Will & Emery
Feb
3
2014
Proceed with Caution: Navigating the Intersection Between Trade Secret and Patent Law - Foster v. Pitney Bowes Corp. McDermott Will & Emery
Feb
3
2014
Statements Describing “the Present Invention” Limit Claim Scope - AstraZeneca AB v. Hanmi USA Inc. McDermott Will & Emery
Feb
3
2014
An Accused Device Is “Modified” by the Installation of Software McDermott Will & Emery
Feb
2
2014
IBM Weighs in on CLS Bank: The Abstract Idea Test is Unworkable for Computer-Implemented Inventions and Should be Abandoned Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Feb
2
2014
“Inherency Requires More Than Probabilities” - Motorola Mobility, LLC v. Int’l Trade Comm’n McDermott Will & Emery
Feb
2
2014
Federal Circuit's Last Word on Attorney Fees ─ Actual Knowledge of Baseless Claim Not Required McDermott Will & Emery
Feb
2
2014
The Bill Graham Show Goes On … and On: Graham-Sult v. Clainos McDermott Will & Emery
Feb
1
2014
Fleeting Use of Work in Historic Display Is Fair Use: Bouchat v. Baltimore Ravens McDermott Will & Emery
Feb
1
2014
E-Discovery Costs Related Specifically to Production Recoverable McDermott Will & Emery
Feb
1
2014
Unanimous Supreme Court to Federal Circuit: Burden of Proof on Infringement on Patentee, Even in Declaratory Judgment McDermott Will & Emery
Jan
31
2014
“Continuing Wrong” Doctrine Rejected by Tenth Circuit - Diversey v. Schmidly McDermott Will & Emery
Jan
31
2014
PTO Litigation Center Report – January 31, 2014 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jan
31
2014
BRIC-a-BRAC: News Items from BRIC Companies January 31, 2014 Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Jan
30
2014
University Research In The Marketplace: Bayh-Dole Act Is A “Job Creator” Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jan
30
2014
PTO Litigation Center Report – January 30, 2014 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jan
30
2014
Supreme Court Addresses Burden of Persuasion in Declaratory Judgment Action Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Jan
29
2014
China: Divisional Practice in the BRICs and other Countries – Part 6 of a 9-Part Series Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Jan
29
2014
Covered Business Method Review Only Requires at Least One Claim Directed to a Covered Business Method for the Entire Patent to be Reviewed Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Jan
29
2014
Boiling Down the Logic Behind the CLS Bank Decision Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jan
29
2014
PTO Litigation Center Report – January 29, 2014 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jan
28
2014
European Patent Office (EPO) Divisionals Update Mintz
Jan
28
2014
PTO Litigation Center Report – January 28, 2014 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jan
27
2014
Are Circuit Courts of Appeal Split as to the Preclusive Impact Accorded to Prior Trademark Trial and Appeal Board Decisions? Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jan
27
2014
Federal Trade Commission (FTC) Hit with Lawsuit by Target of its Fraudulent Patent Enforcement Investigation McDermott Will & Emery
Jan
27
2014
Board Proposes Solution for Petitioner if Expert Witness Not Available for Deposition in Patent Office Trial Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jan
25
2014
Re-Calculating Patent Term Adjustments Once Again Bracewell LLP
Jan
24
2014
Patent Term Adjustment Update - Novartis v. Lee Armstrong Teasdale
Jan
24
2014
BRIC-a-BRAC January 24, 2014: News Items from BRIC Countries Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Jan
24
2014
PTO Litigation Center Report – January 24, 2014 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jan
23
2014
New gLTD Trademark Clearinghouse: Now is the Time Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP
Jan
23
2014
Unanimous Supreme Court: Burden of Proof on Infringement Always on Patentee McDermott Will & Emery
Jan
23
2014
Patentees Bear Burden of Proving Infringement against Licensees Filing MedImmune Declaratory Judgment Lawsuits Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Jan
23
2014
SAP’s Cert Petition Denied by Supreme Court in Versata Patent Infringement Suit Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jan
23
2014
Why the Bilski Analytical Framework is Fundamentally Flawed, and Why Diehr’s 101 Test is Better Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jan
23
2014
PTO Litigation Center Report – January 23, 2014 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jan
23
2014
How to Win the Olympic Gold Medal in the Super Bowl of Trademark Infringement Dickinson Wright PLLC
Jan
22
2014
Collective Redress Likely to Become a Reality in Belgium McDermott Will & Emery
Jan
22
2014
A Possible New Trademark Exception to the Corporate Discharge Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Jan
22
2014
PTO Litigation Center Report – January 22, 2014 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jan
20
2014
BRIC-a-BRAC January 20, 2014: News Items from BRIC Countries Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Jan
20
2014
Recent Developments in Nanotechnology Standards Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Jan
18
2014
Worst Copywriting Mistake for Attorneys Re: Marketing Materials Great Legal Marketing, Inc.
Jan
18
2014
BRIC-a-BRAC January 17, 2014: News Items from BRIC Countries Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins