Intellectual Property

Intellectual property disputes take place on a daily basis in a variety of venues. From an employee’s right to a patent of company-developed products to patent wars between international companies for illegal use of a product/logo, the National Law Review is a great resource for updates on all things IP. The site covers litigation at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the  Patent Trial and Board Appeals (PTAB), as well as cases in front of the International Trade Commission (ITC) for international patent disputes. The National Law Review covers cases heard by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), or appeals which are now sitting in front of the patent-board on Inter partes review (IPR). Additionally, the National Law Review covers cases and decisions of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

Copyrights, patent infringement claims, trade secrets, false advertising claims, unfair competition, and intellectual property laws which govern patent-litigation, are all areas which the National Law Review covers, in detail for readers. Patent disputes don’t only occur in the United States. When international countries including the United Kingdom, Brazil, China, India, and the European Union get involved, international laws are also taken into consideration by the PTO. Additionally, information on how to obtain patent protection internationally is also available on the National Law Review.

Intellectual property news on the National Law Review spans from topics including biosimilars, domain name registration, generic top-level domains (gTLDs), drug patents, non-compete agreements, trade secrets, and other industry-related battles which ensue, are covered on the site. Visitors can read about the latest legislation, laws, and news, as it relates to patents and intellectual property in general. Further, visitors to the National Law Review are going to find the latest stories and litigation as it unfolds in front of patent courts across the land. From email and data retention policies, patent disputes over medical devices, cloud computing and artificial intelligence the National Law Review has the details and expert intellectual property litigation legal analysis readers count on.

For hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Custom text Title Sort descending Organization
Apr
2
2014
No “Second Bite at the Apple” for Non-Petitioner Defendants Seeking Stay Based on Pending Inter Partes Review (IPR) McDermott Will & Emery
Sep
9
2012
No-Challenge Clauses Do Not Bar Later Challenges to Patent Validity McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
16
2016
Noble House v. Floorco: Cautions on Related Party Uses of Marks Katten
Dec
21
2018
Non-Accused Products Are Not a Measure of Patent Damages McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
26
2015
Non-Analogous Art Is Not Prior Art for Purposes of Obviousness: Circuit Check Inc. v. QXQ Inc. McDermott Will & Emery
Sep
1
2015
Non-Apportioned Damages Awards Can Make Design Patents Highly Valuable Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP
May
1
2015
Non-Claimed Elements Cannot Transform an Abstract Idea McDermott Will & Emery
Jul
16
2018
Non-Compete: Who is the Bad Actor? Foley & Lardner LLP
Mar
14
2022
Non-Competes: No More Blue Penciling in Wyoming Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
Nov
22
2009
Non-Competition Agreements: Despite the Myths, Often a Powerful Method of Protecting Your Business Much Shelist, P.C.
Dec
15
2014
Non-Competition Covenants: Seller Considerations and Approaches Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Aug
12
2012
Non-Consumer Confusion May Factor into “Likelihood of Confusion” Analysis McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
1
2018
Non-Defendant IPR Petitioners’ Appellate Standing on Shaky Ground McDermott Will & Emery
Apr
2
2014
Non-Direct Competitors May Sue Under the Lanham Act, Doctrine of Prudential Standing Eliminated McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
31
2016
Non-Disclosure Agreements: What You Need To Know [VIDEO] Mintz
Jun
15
2022
Non-Disparagement Clauses in Employment Contracts Still Valid under New Jersey Law Stark & Stark
Apr
21
2022
Non-Fungible Trademark Infringement or Nominative Fair Use Token? Nike -v- StockX Duel Is on Pace To Shape the Future of the Metaverse ArentFox Schiff LLP
Jun
24
2020
Non-Infringement Need Not “Be Actually Litigated” to Invoke Kessler Doctrine McDermott Will & Emery
Dec
1
2015
Non-Litigant, You Are Not Needed in This IPR McDermott Will & Emery
Feb
28
2014
Non-Practicing Entities' (NPE) Tough Talk Promising Litigation Against Comcast Becomes Self-fulfilling Prophecy Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Oct
25
2017
Non-Profit Organization Appellee Described as Representing the Public Interest Not Excluded from Appearing in Court to Defend a PTAB Decision Hunton Andrews Kurth
Dec
14
2021
Non-Prosecution Agreement Announced in Underwriters Laboratories (UL) Chinese Criminal Copyright Case Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Oct
15
2020
Non-Respondent’s Product Cannot Be Adjudicated for Infringement in Context of General Exclusion Order McDermott Will & Emery
Jun
10
2011
Nonanalogous Art Lives! In Re Klein Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Nov
6
2015
Noncompete Roundup – Oklahoma Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Jun
15
2023
Noncompetes Are in the NLRB’s Crosshairs – Can Trade Secret Protections Save Them? Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP
Aug
17
2023
Noncompulsory Counterclaims Don’t Confer Appellate Jurisdiction McDermott Will & Emery
Sep
17
2021
None of Us Saw Them Stop the PTA Giveaway Finnegan
Aug
31
2021
Nonobviousness of Commercially Successful Designs: Mmm, Mmm, Not So Fast Mintz
May
28
2015
NOPALEA Mark Merely Descriptive of a Product Derived from Nopalea Cactus McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
19
2015
Nora Lighting v. Juno Manufacturing: Denying Institution of Inter Partes Review IPR2015-00601 Faegre Drinker
Jun
23
2015
Normal Int’l, v. Andrew J. Testamentary Trust: Final Written Decision Requiring Translation Affidavit for Foreign Document Submitted During Prosecution IPR2014-00283 Faegre Drinker
Oct
3
2014
Norman International, Inc. v. Andrew J. Toti Testamentary Trust, Russell L. Hinckley, Sr. (Co-Trustee) and Robert F. Miller (Co-Trustee) Granting and Denying Motion to Submit Supplemental Information Faegre Drinker
Jun
30
2014
Norman International, Inc. v. Hunter Douglas Inc.: Denying Institution of Inter Partes Review Faegre Drinker
Dec
9
2015
North America Seoul Semiconductor v. Sharp Kabushiki Kaisha and Enplas Corp: Final Written Decision Finding All Challenged Claims Unpatentable IPR2014-00879 Faegre Drinker
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins