Intellectual Property

Intellectual property disputes take place on a daily basis in a variety of venues. From an employee’s right to a patent of company-developed products to patent wars between international companies for illegal use of a product/logo, the National Law Review is a great resource for updates on all things IP. The site covers litigation at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the  Patent Trial and Board Appeals (PTAB), as well as cases in front of the International Trade Commission (ITC) for international patent disputes. The National Law Review covers cases heard by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), or appeals which are now sitting in front of the patent-board on Inter partes review (IPR). Additionally, the National Law Review covers cases and decisions of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

Copyrights, patent infringement claims, trade secrets, false advertising claims, unfair competition, and intellectual property laws which govern patent-litigation, are all areas which the National Law Review covers, in detail for readers. Patent disputes don’t only occur in the United States. When international countries including the United Kingdom, Brazil, China, India, and the European Union get involved, international laws are also taken into consideration by the PTO. Additionally, information on how to obtain patent protection internationally is also available on the National Law Review.

Intellectual property news on the National Law Review spans from topics including biosimilars, domain name registration, generic top-level domains (gTLDs), drug patents, non-compete agreements, trade secrets, and other industry-related battles which ensue, are covered on the site. Visitors can read about the latest legislation, laws, and news, as it relates to patents and intellectual property in general. Further, visitors to the National Law Review are going to find the latest stories and litigation as it unfolds in front of patent courts across the land. From email and data retention policies, patent disputes over medical devices, cloud computing and artificial intelligence the National Law Review has the details and expert intellectual property litigation legal analysis readers count on.

For hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Custom text Title Sort descending Organization
Jul
30
2014
Obviousness Only Requires Reasonable Expectation of Success of One Compound Encompassed by Broad Genus Claims McDermott Will & Emery
Jan
26
2017
Obviousness Rejection Over Combination of Prior Art References May be Proper Even Where There Was No Explicit Teaching, Suggestion, or Motivation to Combine Hunton Andrews Kurth
Jan
26
2017
Obviousness Rejections Must Articulate Rationale To Support “Common Sense” Motivation To Combine References Hunton Andrews Kurth
Aug
30
2017
Obviousness Reversed for Clear Error in Factual Findings on Combination of References McDermott Will & Emery
Feb
5
2013
Obviousness Ruling Reversed for Failure to Analyze Why References Should Be Combined McDermott Will & Emery
Apr
26
2019
Obviousness Take Two McDermott Will & Emery
Nov
24
2015
Obviousness Versus Obviousness-Type Double Patenting Foley & Lardner LLP
Mar
23
2021
Obviousness-Type Double Patenting and Divisional Applications in Canada Mintz
Jan
17
2018
Obviousness-Type Double Patenting Dangers in the U.S. Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Dec
13
2018
Obviousness-type Double Patenting Does Not Limit an Otherwise Validly Obtained Patent Term Extension Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Apr
30
2013
Obviousness-Type Double Patenting May Exist When There Is Neither Common Ownership nor Common Inventorship McDermott Will & Emery
Nov
25
2012
Obviousness-Type Double Patenting Requires a Reason to Modify with a Reasonable Expectation of Success McDermott Will & Emery
Jan
30
2019
Obviousness-Type Double Patenting" It's Complicated McDermott Will & Emery
Feb
3
2016
Ocean Tomo v. Patent Ratings: Denying Institution for Lack of Standing where Petitioner Not Previously Sued for Patent Infringement CBM2015-00157 Faegre Drinker
Mar
30
2017
Octane Fitness Does Not Provide a Set Formula For Determining Whether to Grant Attorney Fees. Hunton Andrews Kurth
Sep
19
2017
Octane Fitness Hits the Showers: Federal Circuit Affirms Attorneys’ Fees Award in Landmark Case Mintz
Nov
2
2015
October 2015 - gTLD Sunrise Periods Now Open Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Nov
1
2016
October 2016: .goog; .makeup; .cam - gTLD Sunrise Periods Now Open Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Oct
5
2017
October 2017 Update- gTLD Sunrise Periods Now Open Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Nov
14
2019
October 2019 Patent Eligibility Guidance Update Faegre Drinker
Oct
30
2019
October 2019 Update: Subject Matter Eligibility – A Closer Look Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Nov
7
2019
Of Passion, Prejudice And Punitive Damages McDermott Will & Emery
Sep
13
2011
OFCCP Restores and Updates Functional Affirmative Action Program Process for Federal Contractors and Subcontractors Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Jul
27
2023
Off the Charts: Derivative Work Copyright Registers All Material in Derivative Work McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
5
2022
Offences Under The Copyright Act Are Cognizable And Non-bailable: Supreme Court Confirms! Nishith Desai Associates
Apr
30
2015
Offering of Services Alone Insufficient Basis for § 1(a) Trademark Application: David Couture v. Playdom McDermott Will & Emery
May
3
2021
Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR) Released its Annual Special 301 Report Maintaining China on the Priority Watchlist Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Apr
30
2020
Official Statute Annotations Are Not Copyrightable McDermott Will & Emery
Jun
2
2022
Oh Snap: Sufficient Reasoning Must Support Declaratory Judgment Dismissal McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
14
2021
Oh the Horror: No Work for Hire in Friday the 13th Screenplay McDermott Will & Emery
Sep
8
2022
Oh, Fudge. TTAB Finds Curse Word Fails to Function as Trademark McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
12
2015
OHIM: DETOX Is Not Descriptive For The Characteristics Of “Beers” Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Mar
1
2016
Ohio Federal Court Invalidates Cleveland Clinic Diagnostic Patents On Motion To Dismiss Foley & Lardner LLP
Sep
18
2018
Ohio State and Oklahoma Battle It Out Again (Just Not On The Football Field) Brinks Gilson & Lione
Nov
13
2014
Ohio State Tries to Buck Online T-Shirt Company Proskauer Rose LLP
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins