March 23, 2023

Volume XIII, Number 82

Advertisement
Advertisement

March 22, 2023

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

March 21, 2023

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

March 20, 2023

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis
Advertisement

Breathe Easy: U.S. EPA Seeks to Significantly Tighten Fine Particulate Matter Standards

On January 6, 2023, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) issued a proposed rule to lower the primary National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) for fine/inhalable particulate matter (PM2.5). These proposed standards were published in the Federal Register on January 27 triggering a 60-day public comment period that will end on March 28, 2023. EPA is proposing to lower the primary NAAQS PM2.5 emission standard from 12 micrograms per cubic meter (µg/m3) to between nine and ten µg/m. The new standards, if issued as proposed, could result in many areas of the country being designated as nonattainment with the new standards, triggering significant new costs and control requirements for facilities with air permits in those new nonattainment areas.   

The Clean Air Act provides for two types of NAAQS: (1) primary, and (2) secondary.  The primary standards are health based and the secondary standards are meant to protect public welfare.  The current primary PM2.5 annual NAAQS standards were issued in 2012 and reevaluated and maintained by the prior administration in 2020.  In 2021, EPA indicated that it planned to reconsider the 2020 decision to retain the standards.  EPA is planning to retain the current primary 24-hour standard of 35 µg/m3 for PM2.5 but is taking public comment on revising the level to as low as 25 µg/m3. The agency is also planning to retain the current primary 24-hour standard for PM10 and the secondary standards for both PM2.5 and PM10. In addition to proposing more stringent emission standards for PM2.5, EPA is also proposing to revise other related requirements such as monitoring requirements and the Air Quality Index for PM2.5. The changes have potentially sweeping implications. Like ozone, most PM2.5 is not directly emitted from sources, but is instead formed from a reaction of gases in the atmosphere. PM2.5 concentrations tend to vary relatively uniformly distributed over large areas.  

On January 31, EPA provided notice that it will conduct virtual public hearings on the proposed rule on February 21 and February 22. 

© 2023 Foley & Lardner LLPNational Law Review, Volume XIII, Number 32
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

About this Author

Peter Tomasi, Foley Lardner, Environmental lawyer, regulations, environmental issues,
Of Counsel

Peter A. Tomasi is of counsel and a business lawyer with Foley & Lardner LLP, where he is a member of the firm’s Environmental Regulation Practice. His practice focuses on regulatory compliance and renewable energy. Mr. Tomasi has further experience with general civil, commercial, and intellectual property litigation.

Representative Experience

  • Representation of logistics providers and reverse distributors in rulemaking and enforcement matters involving hazardous waste pharmaceuticals
  • ...
414-297-5621
Amanda Beggs, Foley Lardner Law Firm, Milwaukee, Environmental and Energy Law Attorney
Associate

Amanda Beggs is an associate and business lawyer with Foley & Lardner LLP. She is a member of the firm’s Environmental Regulation Practice.

During law school, Ms. Beggs gained experience as a student legal intern at the University of Iowa College of Law Legal Clinic and as a summer associate with Foley (2014). She has also served as a research assistant at the University of Iowa College of Law, a volunteer law clerk at the United States Attorney’s Office Northern District of Iowa, and a judicial extern to the Honorable Justice Robert E....

414-319-7037