January 23, 2022

Volume XII, Number 23

Advertisement
Advertisement

January 21, 2022

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

January 20, 2022

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis
Advertisement

California Legislature Enacts New Employment Laws To Take Effect in 2022 (US)

The California Legislature increased the complexity of employment law in the Golden State by enacting several employment laws that will soon take effect.  Below we summarize key aspects of the more significant new legislation.

Intentional Failure to Pay Wages May Constitute the Felony of “Grand Theft” (Assembly Bill 1003)

Under current law, employers who wrongfully and intentionally withhold wages from employees may be convicted of a misdemeanor.  AB 1003 increases the potential punishment and makes it a felony if an employer, acting intentionally, wrongfully fails to pay wages in an amount greater than $950 to one employee, or $2,350 in the aggregate to two or more employees, within a 12-month period.  Under AB 1003, independent contractors are considered employees, and entities that hire such contractors are considered employers.  Although AB 1003 does not define “employer,” that term is most likely to be construed broadly consistent with California court decisions that define an employer to include any person who exercises control over wages, hours, or working conditions of the employee, and which may include managers, supervisors, officers and owners of a business who are involved in implementing wage and hour policies and practices.  An employer acts “intentionally” when it deprives an employee of wages with knowledge that the wages are due.  Grand theft is punishable by imprisonment in a county jail for up to three years.  Although we expect that prosecutions for grand theft based on a failure to pay wages will be rare, employers must ensure they satisfy their wage payment obligations, as no employer wants to end up singing the Folsom Prison Blues.

Senate Bill 331 Places Additional Restrictions on Confidentiality and Non-Disparagement Provisions in Settlement and Severance Agreements

California law currently prohibits language within a settlement agreement that bars disclosure of factual information relating to an administrative or civil claim for sexual assault, sexual harassment, discrimination based on sex, failure to prevent such an act, or retaliation against a person for reporting such an act.  SB 331 expands the prohibition to apply to any claim for workplace harassment, retaliation, or discrimination based on characteristics protected under the Fair Employment and Housing Act (such as race, religion, age, disability, etc.).  Under SB 331, employers still may include language prohibiting disclosure of the settlement amount, however.

In addition, SB 331 prohibits employers from requiring an employee to sign a release of claims or non-disparagement agreement “denying the employee the right to disclose information about unlawful acts in the workplace” in exchange “for a raise or bonus or as a condition of employment or continued employment.”  Non-disparagement provisions will be permitted only if they contain a disclaimer with the following or substantially similar language: “Nothing in this agreement prevents you from discussing or disclosing information about unlawful acts in the workplace such as harassment or discrimination or any other conduct that you have reason to believe is unlawful.”

SB 331 further requires an employer offering an employee a severance agreement to notify the employee that he or she has the right to consult with an attorney.  The employer must provide the employee at least five business days for consultation.  An employee may decide to sign such an agreement prior to the expiration of the consultation period, so long as the employee’s decision is informed and voluntary.

Assembly Bill 1033 Expands the Coverage of the California Family Rights Act

The California Family Rights Act (CFRA) requires employers with five or more employees to provide up to 12 weeks of job-protected leave in a 12-month period to employees who have worked for at least one year.  Leave may be taken to care for the employee’s serious health condition or for serious health conditions of the employee’s family members.  AB 1033 adds “parent-in-law” to the group of qualifying family members.  AB 1033 also makes changes to the Department of Fair Employment and Housing pilot program that provides for mediation of CFRA claims brought against small employers (defined as employers with between five and 19 employees).

Senate Bill 606 Enhances Penalties for Workplace Safety Violations by Employers With Multiple Worksites

If an employer with multiple worksites is found by the California Division of Occupational Safety and Health (Cal/OSHA) to have a “pattern or practice” of safety violations at more than one worksite, SB 606 creates a rebuttable presumption that the same violation exists throughout the employer’s enterprise. The same presumption arises if the employer has a written policy or procedure that violates a Cal/OSHA safety regulation.  If the employer does not rebut this presumption, Cal/OSHA may issue an enterprise-wide citation requiring enterprise-wide abatement.  Enterprise-wide citations carry the same penalties as repeated or willful citations, which can reach $134,334 per violation.

Senate Bill 807 Extends the Duration for Which Employers Must Retain Employee Personnel Records

SB 807 extends the current requirement for retaining employee personnel records from two to four years.  It also provides for tolling of the statute of limitations while the Department of Fair Employment and Housing investigates complaints of unlawful actions.

Large Warehouse Employers Must Disclose Production Quotas to Non-Exempt Employees (Assembly Bill 701)

AB 701 applies to businesses, staffing agencies, and individual owners who employ 100 or more employees at a single warehouse distribution center or 1,000 or more employees at one or more warehouse distribution centers in California and who utilize quotas in their performance metrics.  The law requires employers to disclose production quotas to the employees and prohibits employers from setting quotas that prevent employees from taking meal and rest periods, using bathroom facilities, or that otherwise result in violations of occupational health and safety laws.

Reminder Regarding Minimum Wage Increase

Although not the result of a new law, employers need to remember that on January 1, 2022, the minimum wage in California will increase to $14.00 per hour for employers with 25 or fewer employees and $15.00 per hour for employers with 26 or more employees.

This new batch of laws signals that California will continue to heavily regulate the employment relationship, and employers will need to be vigilant and to modify policies and practices to remain compliant. 

© Copyright 2022 Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLPNational Law Review, Volume XI, Number 334
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

About this Author

Partner

Carmen Cole is a partner in the Labor & Employment Practice Group. Carmen works with employers to navigate complex employment law issues. Her prior experience as a human resources professional places her in a unique position to understand clients’ issues from a legal and business perspective. Carmen provides advice and counseling to employers on workplace issues, such as compliance with wage and hour laws, reductions in force, recruitment and hiring, employee classification, leave laws and terminations.


Carmen’s practice also consists of litigation defense and counseling....

213-689-5189
Karen E. Wentzel sexual harassment, sex, race, age disability legal specialist
Of Counsel

Karen Wentzel has more than 20 years of experience representing clients in a wide variety of business disputes, with special expertise in the laws governing sexual harassment, sex, race, age and disability discrimination, wrongful discharge, employee raiding and misappropriation of trade secrets, and stock options. She regularly appears in both state and federal courts, and in private arbitrations.

Karen regularly advises clients on the avoidance of litigation on wage and hour matters, reductions-in-force, unfair competition, reasonable accommodation, protecting proprietary...

1 650 843 3341
Eric Witt Employment Lawyer Squire Patton Boggs LA Law Firm
Associate

Eric Witt has substantial experience representing businesses in employment litigation matters. He has successfully represented businesses defending against a wide range of allegations in the workplace, including harassment, discrimination, retaliation and wrongful termination, as well as wage and hour claims brought on a class or representative basis under federal and state law, including the California Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA).

Eric represents clients before state and federal administrative agencies, including the Department of Labor, Equal Employment Opportunity...

213 689 5179
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement