July 4, 2020

Volume X, Number 186

July 03, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

July 02, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

July 01, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

California Pay Equity Data Collection Legislation Closer to Passing

Currently, certain employers are required under federal law to file annual Employer Information Reports (EEO-1) with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. These EEO-1s must contain data regarding demographics of the employer’s workforce. Accordingly, employers covered by federal EEO-1 reporting requirements were required to file EEO-1 Component 1 data from 2018 by May 31, 2019, and must still submit Component 2 EEO-1 (pay and hours worked) data for their workforces by September 30, 2019. Not to be outdone, the State of California is poised to impose a similar requirement on employers.

In June, we reported that California employers may soon be required to report pay equity data that they collect from their employees. California’s Senate Bill (SB) 171, which the Senate passed on May 22, 2019, is now one step closer to being law. Currently it is pending in the California Assembly and has gone through several rounds of committee review and amendments. The bill would require certain employers to “submit a pay data report to the Department of Fair Employment and Housing that contains specified wage information.” The report would need to categorize employees into 10 general job classifications and disclose the number of employees by race, ethnicity, and sex who fall into pay bands set by the U. S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.

According to the bill, a private employer with 100 or more employees that needs to file an EEO-1 report under federal law must submit a pay data report including wage information to the Department of Fair Employment and Housing (DFEH). The first deadline for California employers to submit the data would be March 31, 2021. Subsequent reports would be due “on or before March 31 each year thereafter.”

If it became law, the bill would require the DFEH to maintain the pay data reports for at least 10 years and make the reports available to the Division of Labor Standards Enforcement (DLSE). The DFEH would be permitted to seek an order requiring any employer that does not submit the required report to comply with the law. The bill would prohibit officers or employees of the DFEH or the DLSE from making public “any individually identifiable information obtained from the report prior to the institution of certain investigation or enforcement proceedings, as specified.” The information would also be exempted from public records requests under the California Public Records Act.

September 13, 2019, is the deadline for the bill to pass in the Assembly, and then the governor has until October 13, 2019, to sign or veto the bill.

Key Takeaways

If SB 171 passes, California employers will be required to submit pay equity data to the state agency beginning in two years. Employers that must already comply with federal EEO-1 reporting may not experience much additional reporting burden.

However, the federal EEO-1 pay equity requirements have been controversial, and it is possible that political or judicial action could negate those regulations. If that happens on the national level and if SB 171 passes into law, then California employers would bear the unique burden of reporting pay equity data to the government.

Furthermore, California employers may expect to see an increase in pay equity enforcement action from the state agency. State regulators could evaluate the data and then contend that an employer is paying members of different races, ethnicities, or genders in an unlawful way.

In light of other recent changes in California pay equity law, California employers may expect to see more class-action litigation on pay equity issues. Many employers are conducting periodic pay audits to ensure there are no mistakes with regard to compensation.

© 2020, Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C., All Rights Reserved.National Law Review, Volume IX, Number 228


About this Author

Christopher W. Olmsted, Ogletree Deakins, Employment Law Compliance Attorney, Retaliation Claims Lawyer,

Christopher Olmsted is a shareholder in the firm's San Diego office.

Mr. Olmsted helps businesses avoid employment-related legal claims by providing California employment law compliance advice. He also defends employers in a variety of litigation matters. Mr. Olmsted's employment law compliance and litigation experience includes: California FEHA and Title VII discrimination, harassment and retaliation claims; wrongful termination claims; wage and hour compliance and defense of claims and labor agency audits; California CFRA, federal FMLA and...

Hera S Arsen PhD
Managing Editor of Firm Publications

Hera S. Arsen, J.D., Ph.D., is Managing Editor of the firm's publications, overseeing the firm's print and online legal publications and content. Hera, who joined Ogletree Deakins in 2003, is directly responsible for writing and editing the firm's national legal content, including coverage of federal agencies and the Supreme Court of the United States. She also oversees the Ogletree Deakins blog, which covers the latest legal news from over 20 practice-areas and jurisdictions. As leader of the firm's blog, Hera writes blog posts on a variety of legal issues, edits attorney-authored blog posts, and strategizes on the development of timely content. Her articles have been featured in a number of publications and media outlets.