September 25, 2021

Volume XI, Number 268

Advertisement

September 24, 2021

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

September 23, 2021

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

September 22, 2021

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

COBRA Subsidy: What We Know Now After Initial DOL Guidance

Less than a month after the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 (ARPA) was signed into law, new U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) guidance and model forms are clearing up a number of employer concerns about the 100 percent COBRA coverage subsidy for continuing health benefits that runs from April 1, 2021, to September 30, 2021.

Though employers still await COBRA premium subsidy regulations, including guidance from the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) on claiming reimbursements, on April 7, 2021, the DOL’s Employee Benefits Security Administration (EBSA) issued guidance in the form of frequently asked questions (FAQs), which provides clarity in certain areas.

Along with the FAQs, the EBSA also published several model COBRA notices:

  1. an election notice for “Assistance Eligible Individuals” (AEIs) experiencing qualifying events from April 1, 2021, through September 30, 2021;

  2. an election notice for AEIs currently enrolled in COBRA coverage, or who experienced a qualifying event prior to April 1, 2021, but who never enrolled in, or discontinued, COBRA coverage;

  3. an alternative election notice to be used by plans subject to state “mini-COBRA” laws;

  4. a notice of expiration of the premium subsidy; and

  5. a summary of the premium assistance and “Request for Treatment as an Assistance Eligible Individual” form, to be provided along with the other model notices.

The FAQs and model notices shed light on the following issues.

COBRA Deadline Extensions

In the FAQs, the EBSA clarifies that deadlines to elect fully subsidized COBRA coverage under the ARPA are not subject to the deadline extensions put in place during the pandemic by the DOL and the IRS. Delaying the deadlines to elect subsidized COBRA coverage by up to one year would have made it more difficult for employers to administer the subsidy. Individuals must elect subsidized COBRA coverage, using the provided election form, within 60 days of the date on the election notice.

Choice of COBRA Coverage Start Dates

The FAQs guidance emphasizes that AEIs with qualifying events that occurred before April 1, 2021, may be able to choose two very different COBRA coverage arrangements. First, someone eligible for COBRA benefits due to an involuntary termination of employment or reduction in hours that occurred in mid-2020, during the period of time that the pandemic-related deadline was extended, would be able to elect COBRA coverage in 2021 that would be effective back to the date of the qualifying event. Such an AEI would be charged COBRA premiums for coverage periods up until April 1, 2021, when the subsidy would begin. Alternatively, this AEI could elect to take advantage only of the subsidized COBRA premiums, which would not go back to the date of his or her qualifying event, but would start on April 1, 2021. This choice is highlighted in the relevant model notices.

The FAQs also note that an employer may need to reimburse or credit individuals for COBRA premium payments they made if it is later discovered that the payment corresponded to one month of COBRA coverage for which the individual was eligible for the premium assistance.

No Extended Election Periods Under State Mini-COBRA Laws

The FAQs also clarify that the ARPA did not modify the definition of “election period” in any state “mini-COBRA” laws. The ARPA added an extended COBRA election period for individuals who would be eligible for assistance had they elected or not discontinued federal COBRA coverage prior to April 1, 2021. The FAQs clarify that employers subject to state mini-COBRA laws will not be required to provide the special subsidized COBRA election notice to such individuals. This is consistent with the EBSA model Alternative Notice for use by employers or plans subject to state mini-COBRA laws, and their AEIs who experience qualifying events from April 1, 2021, through September 30, 2021.

Eligibility for Other Group Coverage vs. Individual Coverage

Under the ARPA, eligibility for Medicare or other group health coverage, such as coverage under a spouse’s employer’s plan or a new employer’s plan, would make an individual ineligible for the COBRA premium subsidy. The FAQs guidance makes clear that eligibility for Medicaid or individual Affordable Care Act (ACA) marketplace coverage does not make an individual ineligible for the COBRA premium subsidy. In fact, the FAQs point out that individuals may want to drop individual coverage or Medicaid to take advantage of the subsidy period.

Potential Penalties for ARPA Subsidy Failures

Although the ARPA did not impose new penalties for employers, plans, or insurers for failure to comply with the COBRA premium subsidy rules, the FAQs highlight that employers are subject to COBRA’s existing civil penalty structure for any ARPA subsidy-related failures, including failure to provide the subsidy or failure to provide required notices. The excise tax for COBRA violations “could be as much as $100 per qualified beneficiary” (to a family maximum of $200) for each day that the violation continues.

Unanswered Questions

The FAQs and model notices leave some important questions unaddressed. First, this initial guidance does not include details on administering the Medicare tax credit designed to reimburse employers for the foregone COBRA premiums. The IRS has issued a draft Form 7200 for employers to claim an advance payment of the tax credit, but we anticipate that the IRS will also issue a revised Form 941 and additional guidance in the near future.

Also, while the FAQs acknowledge that employers will need to look back in time to identify all potential AEIs who may have a second election opportunity (“generally” to October 1, 2019, according to the FAQs), the FAQs do not clarify whether an individual who is entitled to COBRA coverage in April 2021, or beyond, due to a second qualifying event or a disability extension of COBRA coverage, could be an AEI. For example, if an employee was involuntarily terminated in November 2018, and her COBRA coverage began on December 1, 2018, her 18-month maximum coverage period would ordinarily expire on May 31, 2020, and she would not be an AEI. However, if she became entitled to the 11-month disability extension of COBRA coverage, her maximum COBRA coverage period would expire on April 30, 2021. The wording of the ARPA itself suggests that she would be an AEI in this situation, but confirmation from the DOL would be welcome.

Another unanswered question is whether mutual separations or voluntary reduction in force programs should be categorized as voluntary or involuntary terminations of employment for purposes of the COBRA premium subsidy. In addition, guidance would be welcome regarding whether, when a formerly involuntarily terminated employee who is an AEI and is rehired by the same employer, and thus becomes eligible for the employer’s health plan again, would then lose eligibility for the subsidy.

© 2021, Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C., All Rights Reserved.National Law Review, Volume XI, Number 99
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

About this Author

Timothy Stanton, Ogletree Daikins Law Firm, Data Privacy and Employment Attorney
Shareholder

Tim Stanton is an energetic advocate for and trusted advisor to inside counsel and benefits and HR executives.

His clients include: retailers and wholesalers; insurance, banking and financial services firms; and food companies and manufacturers, as well as colleges and universities.

Tim actively counsels clients on the roller coaster ride that is national health care reform, as well as on ERISA fiduciary duties, health information privacy and security, retiree medical age discrimination, and consumer-directed health...

312-558-1249
Kristine Bingman, of counsel, Portland
Of Counsel

Kristine works with clients on a variety of issues related to health and welfare and retirement plans. Her practice includes advising clients about all aspects of ERISA and Internal Revenue Code compliance as it relates to employee benefit plans, as well as drafting and amending plan documents, and negotiating plan service provider agreements. She advises clients on compliance with health care reform, COBRA, HIPAA, nondiscrimination rules, fiduciary duties, qualified domestic relations orders, reporting and disclosure requirements, Code Section 125 cafeteria plans, and...

503-552-2143
Associate

Hillary Sizer joined Ogletree Deakins’ Chicago office as an associate in 2019. She assists clients with ERISA compliance matters, focusing on health and welfare plans. She graduated in 2019, with distinction, from Georgetown University Law Center where she earned a Master of Laws in Taxation and an Employee Benefits Certificate. She is a 2018 graduate of the Lewis & Clark Law School in Portland, Oregon. While there, she spent a summer externing for the Oregon Tax Court. She received a BA in Philosophy, cum laude...

312-558-3147
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement