May 17, 2022

Volume XII, Number 137

Advertisement
Advertisement

May 16, 2022

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis
Advertisement

Colorado Expands Pregnancy Discrimination Law

Colorado Governor John Hickenlooper has signed into law a bill that makes it an unfair employment practice if an employer fails to provide reasonable accommodations to a job applicant or an employee for conditions related to pregnancy or childbirth.

Amending the Colorado Anti-Discrimination Act, the bi-partisan bill (House Bill 16-1438) provides greater protections for pregnant employees than those provided under federal law. The new law applies to most employers, regardless of size, and requires accommodations for conditions related to pregnancy or childbirth that may qualify as disabilities under the Americans with Disabilities Act.

All Colorado employers must comply with the new law, which goes into effect on August 10, 2016.

Requirements

Under the new law, employers must provide reasonable accommodations to applicants and employees for health conditions related to pregnancy or the physical recovery from childbirth if the applicant or employee requests such accommodations.

The law also requires employers to engage in an interactive process with employees who request accommodations. The interactive process must be timely and conducted in good-faith to determine “effective, reasonable accommodations.”

The employer may require the applicant or employee to provide a note from her health care provider stating the need for a reasonable accommodation.

Examples of reasonable accommodations include the following:

  • More frequent or longer break periods;

  • More frequent restroom, food, and water breaks;

  • Acquisition or modification of equipment or seating;

  • Limitations on lifting;

  • Temporary transfer to a less strenuous or hazardous position;

  • Job restructuring;

  • Light duty;

  • Assistance with manual labor; and

  • Modified work schedules.

An employer cannot require a pregnant applicant or employee to accept an accommodation that the applicant or employee has not requested and it cannot require an employee to take leave if the employer can provide another reasonable accommodation. This supports the legislative intent of keeping pregnant women employed so that they can generate income for their families.

Undue Hardship

Employers, however, are not required to provide accommodations that impose any “undue hardship” to the employer’s business.

Factors considered in determining undue hardship include:

  • the nature and cost of the accommodation;

  • the overall financial resources of the employer;

  • the overall size of the employer’s business; and

  • the effect on the expenses, resources, or operations of the employer.

Employers also are not required to hire new employees, discharge employees, transfer employees with more seniority, promote unqualified employees, or create new positions.

However, if an employer provides an accommodation to another class of employees, but fails to provide a similar accommodation to pregnant employees, the law presumes the accommodation does not impose an undue hardship.

Retaliation Prohibited

Employers may not retaliate against employees who request or use a reasonable accommodation related to pregnancy, childbirth, or a related condition.

The definition of “adverse action” includes “any action where a reasonable employee would have found the action materially adverse, such that it might have dissuaded a reasonable worker from making or supporting a charge of discrimination.” The new law arguably covers a broader range of adverse employment actions than federal law.

Moreover, employers may not deny employment opportunities to an employee based on the need to make a reasonable accommodation.

Notice

Beginning August 10, 2016, employers must provide new employees written notice of employees’ right to be free from discriminatory or unfair employment practices at the start of employment.

Employers must provide current employees with written notice of their rights under the new law by December 8, 2016.

As with other discrimination and employment safety laws, employers must post the required notice in a conspicuous place in the employer’s place of business. The law does not provide specific guidance on the content or language of the required notice.

Jackson Lewis P.C. © 2022National Law Review, Volume VI, Number 161
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

About this Author

Ryan P. Lessmann, Jackson Lewis, claims alleging discrimination lawyer, whistleblower retaliation attorney
Office Managing Principal

Ryan Lessmann is the Office Managing Principal of the Denver, Colorado, office of Jackson Lewis P.C. He practices primarily in the area of employment litigation, including representing employers against claims alleging discrimination, retaliation, and wrongful termination, matters involving trade secret protection, restrictive covenants and unfair competition, and various contract issues.

Mr. Lessmann also counsels and defends employers in wage and hour compliance matters. Prior to joining Jackson Lewis, Mr. Lessmann was an...

303-225-2418
Kristen Baylis, Jackson Lewis, Labor compliance attorney, discrimination allegations lawyer,
Associate

Kristen M. Baylis is an Associate in the Denver, Colorado, office of Jackson Lewis P.C. She practices primarily in the area of employment litigation.

Ms. Baylis brings to her clients knowledge and insight into the federal courts she gained while serving as a judicial clerk to the Honorable Patrick Michael Duffy, United States District Judge for the District of South Carolina, Charleston Division. Using that insight, Ms. Baylis counsels employers to prevent litigation and defends employers in litigation with employees and...

303-892-0404
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement