October 24, 2020

Volume X, Number 298

Advertisement

October 23, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

October 22, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

October 21, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

Commodity Futures Trading Commission Issues Time-Limited Relief from CFTC Rule 1.56

The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) issued Letter No. 20-28 on Sept. 15, 2020. Letter 20-28 addresses issues of relevance both for futures commission merchants (FCMs) as well as asset managers trading separate accounts on behalf of institutional customers. Letter 20-28 provides limited interpretive and no-action relief from certain provisions of CFTC Rule 1.56 – Prohibition of guaranties against loss. Letter 20-28 is the latest regulatory response triggered by a pair of regulatory alerts (Alerts) issued by the Joint Audit Committee (JAC). The JAC includes representatives from CME Group, ICE Futures and the National Futures Association.

Rule §1.56 is intended to prevent an FCM’s customers from trying to segregate losses in one account from being offset against assets in another account for the same customer. Rule 1.56 states in relevant part that:
 

. . .
 
   
(b)   No futures commission merchant or introducing broker may in any way represent that it will, with respect to any commodity interest in any account carried by the futures commission merchant for or on behalf of any person:
 
(1)   Guarantee such person against loss;
 
(2)   Limit the loss of such person; or
 
(3)   Not call for or attempt to collect initial and maintenance margin as established by the rules of the applicable board of trade.
 
(c)   No person may in any way represent that a futures commission merchant or introducing broker will engage in any of the acts or practices described in paragraph (b) of this section.
 
. . .    

The JAC initially issued the Alerts on March 14, 2019, to address the treatment of separate accounts for margin purposes and the prohibition against loss guarantees by registered FCMs. In addition to multiple accounts held by one customer, Rule 1.56 recognizes that in some cases, FCMs may enter into arrangements with certain customers to forbear from taking all available remedial action to correct a margin deficiency arising in accounts of such customers.

The Alerts were intended to “serve as [a] reminder[s]” to FCMs that separately managed accounts in the same regulatory account classification and held for the same beneficial owner “should be combined for margin purposes,” and that any limited recourse or nonrecourse clauses in an FCM customer agreement “are not in compliance with industry regulations and are not permitted.” CFTC initially responded to the Alerts by issuing Letter No. 19-17 and an accompanying release dated July 10, 2019, and a subsequent public statement by two CFTC division directors dated Sept. 13, 2019, granting time-limited no-action relief from applicable provisions of Rule 1.56 until June 30, 2021, provided that “FCMs and their customers … find solutions that satisfy the Commission’s requirements … by September 15, 2020.”

With respect to the relationship between Rule 1.56’s separately managed account requirements and FCM customer account documents, Section II.B of Letter 20-28 states that an FCM and its clients (or clients’ third-party managers) may agree on a protocol whereby an FCM takes certain steps before using assets in one account to cover margin calls in another account of the same beneficial owner. Although Letter 20-28 does not detail specifically what such steps are, it requires that “the FCM must retain … the discretion to … [accelerate]the FCM’s protocol for liquidation or for accessing funds in the other accounts of the beneficial owner held at the FCM.”

Section II.C of Letter 20-28 provides no-action relief where an FCM’s customer account documentation includes language that could be viewed as limiting the FCM’s implementation of remedial measures regarding undermargined accounts. CFTC will not recommend enforcement action for agreements entered into before March 31, 2021, provided that the FCM obtains a legal opinion or well-reasoned memorandum from outside counsel by such date, stating that its customer agreements do not:

(i)   guarantee the beneficial owner against loss;
 
(ii)   limit the loss of the beneficial owner; or
 
(iii)   prohibit the FCM from calling for or attempting to collect initial and maintenance margin as established by the rules of the applicable board of trade.

Even if an FCM’s customer documentation contains provisions that could be construed as representations to limit recourse in violation of Rule 1.56, Letter 20-28 states that CFTC staff would consider such a violation to be cured if the FCM promptly discloses in writing to the client(s):

(i)   that Rule 1.56 provides that the FCM may not represent that it will guarantee a beneficial owner against loss, limit the loss of the beneficial owner or prohibit the FCM from calling for or attempting to collect initial and maintenance margin as established by the rules of the applicable board of trade; and
 
(ii)   an explanation of the FCM’s reliance on applicable law and severability of contractual provisions in order to be in compliance with Rule 1.56.

Letter 20-28 provides various pathways for FCMs to comply with Rule 1.56. FCMs may want to consider reviewing their customer account documentation to determine whether the language is ambiguous or whether regulatory relief is available. Letter 20-28 makes clear that such relief will not be available after March 31, 2021.

©2020 Greenberg Traurig, LLP. All rights reserved. National Law Review, Volume X, Number 275
Advertisement

TRENDING LEGAL ANALYSIS

Advertisement
Advertisement

About this Author

Jeffry Henderson, Greenberg Traurig Law Firm, Chicago, Finance and Securities Litigation Attorney
Shareholder

Jeffry M. Henderson focuses his practice on a wide variety of compliance, regulatory, litigation and managed fund matters. He advises broker-dealers, investment advisers, introducing brokers, futures commission merchants, forex dealer members, commodity pool operators, commodity trading advisors and hedge fund managers regarding futures, derivatives, forex and securities issues. Jeffry advises proprietary trading firms and exempt investment managers regarding disclosure, regulatory and enforcement matters. He is also routinely involved in regulatory work and defending...

312-456-8453
Douglas E Arend  Commodities Attorney Greenberg Traurig Chicago
Of Counsel

Douglas E. Arend focuses his practice on commodity futures, derivatives and securities, with an emphasis on managed funds. He represents registered and exempt investment advisers, commodity pools and hedge funds, proprietary trading firms, introducing brokers, futures commission merchants and broker-dealers. Douglas concentrates on complex transactional and regulatory matters, including public and private offerings, fund formation, business structuring, registration and compliance. His public fund experience includes SEC registered offerings, and compliance with the Securities Act of 1933, the Dodd-Frank Act, the Commodity Exchange Act and CFTC regulations.

Concentrations

  • Commodity futures, derivatives and securities
  • Fund formation and business structuring
  • Private placements
  • Compliance with the Securities Act of 1933, the Dodd-Frank Act,
  • Hedge Funds and commodity pools
  • Broker-dealers and investment advisers

 

3124765029
Advertisement
Advertisement