January 29, 2022

Volume XII, Number 29

Advertisement
Advertisement

January 28, 2022

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

January 27, 2022

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

January 26, 2022

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

Consumer Financial Protection Bureau Unveils Proposed Rule Limiting Class Action Waivers

On May 5, 2016, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) unveiled a widely anticipated proposed rule imposing two sets of limitations on the use of pre-dispute arbitration agreements by providers of consumer financial products and services.

First, the proposed rule would prohibit providers from using pre-dispute arbitration agreements to block consumer class actions and would require providers to insert language into their arbitration agreements reflecting this limitation.

Second, the proposed rule would require providers that use pre-dispute arbitration agreements to submit various arbitration records to the CFPB. The CFPB would then use the records to monitor arbitration and publish records on its website “in some form, with appropriate redactions or aggregation as warranted.”

The proposed rule would apply to most consumer financial products and services that the CFPB oversees, including, but not limited to, extensions of credit under the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, automobile leases, credit reports, account services under the Truth in Savings Act, accounts and remittance transfers subject to the Electronic Fund Transfer Act, debt settlement and debt collection.

The proposed rule raises serious concerns for many banks and other financial service companies that regularly use mandatory arbitration clauses to avoid the unpredictable costs of class action lawsuits. Opponents allege that arbitration is a fast and relatively cheap dispute resolution forum. As president of the Consumer Banker Association Richard Hunt has stated, it appears “the real winners of [this] proposal are trial attorneys, not consumers.” Proponents of the proposed rule argue that class actions of relatively small-dollar disputes force companies to internalize costs. 

Comments on the proposal will be due 90 days after it is published in the Federal Register, and the CFPB is proposing an effective date of 30 days after a final rule is published in the Federal Register. Consistent with the Dodd-Frank Act, the proposed rule will apply only to agreements entered into 180 days after the effective date. In the interim, companies that do not currently include arbitration agreements in their financial services contracts should consider adding them. Agreements entered into before the new rule becomes effective will survive enactment of the new rule.

©2022 MICHAEL BEST & FRIEDRICH LLPNational Law Review, Volume VI, Number 133
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

About this Author

Joseph Olson, Michael Best Law Firm, Employee Benefits Litigation Attorney
Partner

Joe is a trial attorney practicing primarily in the areas of class action defense, wage and hour litigation, employee benefits litigation, regulatory compliance, and complex commercial litigation. In this capacity, he:

  • Routinely helps clients deal with class actions suits across all subject matters

  • Handles all aspects of complex employment litigation including wage and hour suits arising under the federal Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) and applicable state laws, plus benefits litigation...

414-277-3465
Marie G. Bahoora, litigation, commercial contract disputes, property tax, Michael Best Law Firm
Associate

Marie has represented clients at all stages of litigation in both federal and state court. She has experience handling a broad range of litigation matters including commercial contract disputes, property tax disputes, and product liability actions.

Prior to joining Michael Best, Marie was an intern for Justice Ann Walsh Bradley in the Wisconsin Supreme Court. She also served as an intern in the Drug Unit at the Dane County District Attorney’s Office, an extern in the Civil Litigation Unit at the Wisconsin Department of Justice, and a student attorney for the Wisconsin Innocence...

414-225-8299
Benjamin Kaplan, Michael Best, product liability litigation, class action defense attorney,
Associate

Ben focuses on consumer protection, business tort, and class action litigation, providing careful analysis of complex issues and practical advice for resolving disputes and concerns. Ben has jury trial experience in both state and federal courts, as well as appellate experience in multiple federal appellate circuits.  

414-223-2504
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement