January 23, 2021

Volume XI, Number 23

Advertisement

January 22, 2021

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

January 21, 2021

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

January 20, 2021

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

Court Rules Rights To Timeshare Vacation Points Are Not Securities

Both the Securities Act of 1933 and the California Corporate Securities Law of 1968 define the term "security" by providing a long and varied list of financial instruments and contractual relationships.  Neither law mentions timeshare vacation points in ipsissimis verbis.  Nonetheless, an unlisted instrument or relationship may be a security if it can be identified with one of of the listed terms such as "investment contract".

In Scott v. Bluegreen Vacations Unlimited, Inc., 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 107212, the plaintiffs purchased "Owner Beneficiary Rights" that included the right to an annual allotment of "Vacation Points" representing the opportunity to use and enjoy The Club at Big Bear Village (and other vacation properties in the defendant's portfolio).  After becoming unhappy with their purchase, the plaintiffs sued alleging claims under both the Securities Act and the CSL.  The defendants moved to dismiss on the basis that the purchased rights were not securities.

Applying the definition of an "investment contract" adopted by the U.S. Supreme Court in SEC v. W.J. Howey Co., 328 U.S. 293 (1946), Judge Anthony W. Ishii ruled that the purchased rights were not securities under either the federal or state definitions.  In particular, he noted that the Vacation Points were for the use and enjoyment of the purchaser and not transferable. 

Judge Ishii's ruling should not be understood to mean that a time share arrangement can never come within the definition of a "security".  An arrangement's status as a security is not determined by nomenclature but by the particular facts and circumstances involved.

Advertisement
© 2010-2020 Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP National Law Review, Volume X, Number 190
Advertisement

TRENDING LEGAL ANALYSIS

Advertisement
Advertisement

About this Author

Keith Paul Bishop, Corporate Transactions Lawyer, finance securities attorney, Allen Matkins Law Firm
Partner

Keith Bishop works with privately held and publicly traded companies on federal and state corporate and securities transactions, compliance, and governance matters. He is highly-regarded for his in-depth knowledge of the distinctive corporate and regulatory requirements faced by corporations in the state of California.

While many law firms have a great deal of expertise in federal or Delaware corporate law, Keith’s specific focus on California corporate and securities law is uncommon. A former California state regulator of securities and financial institutions, Keith has decades of...

949-851-5428
Advertisement
Advertisement