May 19, 2022

Volume XII, Number 139

Advertisement
Advertisement

May 19, 2022

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

May 18, 2022

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

May 17, 2022

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

May 16, 2022

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

Is COVID-19 a Disability? EEOC Provides Updated Guidance

On December 14, 2021, the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) added a new section, COVID-19 and the Definition of “Disability” Under the ADA/Rehabilitation Act, to its COVID-19 guidance. The updated guidance describes how the ADA’s three-part definition of disability (actual disability, record of disability or being regarded as an individual with a disability) applies to COVID-19 and the resulting impact on employers’ obligations under the law.

Much of the updated guidance focuses on situations when COVID-19 is, or is not, an actual disability. For example, the guidance confirms that an individual with COVID-19 who is asymptomatic or who experiences “mild symptoms similar to those of the common cold or flu that resolve in a matter of weeks – with no other consequences – will not have an actual disability within the meaning of the ADA.” However, the updated guidance clarifies that situations involving more serious symptoms, particularly those expected to last several months, may constitute an actual disability under the ADA. In addition, the updated guidance confirms that conditions that are caused or worsened by COVID-19 can be an actual disability. The guidance reiterates that only individuals with an actual disability or record of a disability are eligible for reasonable accommodations (assuming the disability requires an accommodation and there is no undue hardship on the employer).

The EEOC’s updated guidance also raises key considerations for employers on the risks of potential “regarded as” disability claims.

Specifically, question N.8 of the EEOC’s updated guidance confirms that an employer does not automatically violate the ADA by taking an adverse action against an individual because they have COVID-19. “The ADA’s “direct threat” defense could permit an employer to require an employee with COVID-19 or its symptoms to refrain from physically entering the workplace during the CDC-recommended period of isolation, due to the significant risk of substantial harm to the health of others.” The guidance goes on to caution, however, that employers risk violating the ADA if they exclude an employee from the workplace based upon “myths, fears, or stereotypes” after the threat has passed (i.e., when an individual is no longer infectious and medically cleared to return to work).  The EEOC’s updated guidance highlights the need for employers to ensure their policies are consistent with current guidance issued by the CDC.

In addition, employers should take note of the EEOC’s reminder at question N.14 that the ADA’s requirements with respect to disability-related inquiries, medical exams, confidentiality of medical information, retaliation and interference apply to all applicants and employees regardless of whether they have a “disability” as defined by the ADA.

As employers work to implement policies and collect information regarding employees’ vaccination status, employers should be mindful of the guidance issued by the EEOC.

 

Jackson Lewis P.C. © 2022National Law Review, Volume XI, Number 349
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

About this Author

Catherine A. Cano, Jackson Lewis, Federal Disability Lawyer, Retaliation Matters Attorney
Associate

Catherine A. Cano is an Associate in the Omaha, Nebraska, office of Jackson Lewis P.C. She represents management in all areas of labor and employment law. 

Ms. Cano helps clients navigate state, federal, and local leave and disability laws. Ms. Cano has experience in litigation and arbitration in several areas, including employment discrimination, retaliation and whistleblower claims, and non-competes and unfair competition. Ms. Cano’s practice also includes assisting clients involved in union organization campaigns, collective bargaining,...

402-391-1991
Tania J. Mistretta Attorney Employment Law Litigation Jackson Lewis New York City
Principal

Tania J. Mistretta is a principal in the New York City, New York, office of Jackson Lewis P.C. Her practice focuses on representing employers in all areas of employment law, including handling employment litigation matters and offering preventative counseling.

Tania’s employment litigation experience includes defending employers against claims of discrimination, retaliation and harassment under federal, state and local law. She regularly counsels employers on a broad range of employee issues, including disciplines and...

212-545-4070
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement