December 9, 2022

Volume XII, Number 343


December 08, 2022

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

December 07, 2022

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

December 06, 2022

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

Deadline Approaching to Submit Comments on DOL Proposed Independent Contractor Rule

The U.S. Department of Labor (“DOL”) recently released a proposed rule seeking to clarify independent contractor vs. employee status under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”).   The proposed rule seeks to simplify the “economic realities” test currently applied by federal courts in various forms.  “The Department’s proposal aims to bring clarity and consistency to the determination of who’s an independent contractor under the Fair Labor Standards Act,” Secretary of Labor Eugene Scalia explained in the DOL’s news release.  “Once finalized, it will make it easier to identify employees covered by the Act, while respecting the decision other workers make to pursue the freedom and entrepreneurialism associated with being an independent contractor.”

Current Test

Currently, the factors generally considered by the courts to varying degrees under the economic realities test are:

  1. The extent to which the services rendered are an integral part of the principal’s business.
  2. The permanency of the relationship.
  3. The amount of the alleged contractor’s investment in facilities and equipment.
  4. The nature and degree of control by the principal.
  5. The alleged contractor’s opportunities for profit and loss.
  6. The amount of initiative, judgment, or foresight in open market competition with others required for the success of the claimed independent contractor.
  7. The degree of independent business organization and operation.

Proposed Rule: Two Core Factors

Under the proposed rule, the DOL has retained but modified this test, focusing on two core factors and identifying three other factors that may serve as additional guideposts.

The two core factors under the proposed rule are:

  1. The nature and degree of the worker’s control over the work; and
  2. The worker’s opportunity for profit or loss.

The DOL has explained that these core factors are “highly probative to the inquiry because the ability to control one’s work and to earn profits and risk losses strikes at the core of what it means to be an entrepreneurial independent contractor, as opposed to a ‘wage earner’ employee.”  Additionally, “control and opportunity for profit or loss drive at the heart of what it means to be an independent contractor who is in business for oneself and are the most relevant factors in virtually every case.”

Under the proposed rule, the first core factor would weigh in favor of an independent contractor finding if the individual exercises substantial control over key aspects of his or her performance.  Examples include “setting his or her own work schedule, choosing assignments, working with little or no supervision, and being able to work for others, including a potential employer’s competitors.”  The proposed rule clarifies that requiring an individual to comply with legal obligations, satisfy health and safety standards, carry insurance, meet contractually agreed-upon deadlines, or standards, or to meet other similar terms typical of contractual relationships between businesses would not constitute control that would make the individual more or less likely to be an employee under the FLSA.

The second core factor would weigh in support of an independent contractor finding if the individual has an opportunity for profit or loss based on either or both: “(1) The exercise of personal initiative, including managerial skill or business acumen; and/or (2) the management of investments in, or capital expenditure on, for example, helpers, equipment, or material.”  If the individual is unable to affect his or her earnings through initiative or investment or is only able to do so by working more hours or more efficiently, then the factor would weigh toward employee classification.

If both core factors point toward the same classification, then the “bulk of analysis is complete.” However, if the two core factors do not point toward the same classification, then the remaining guideposts should be considered to determine the appropriate classification.  These three other factors are: (i) the amount of skill required for the work; (ii) the degree of permanence of the working relationship between the worker and the potential employer; and (iii) whether the work is part of an integrated unit of production.

Lastly, the proposed rule emphasizes that when analyzing whether a worker is an employee or independent contractor under the FLSA, the actual practice of the worker(s) and potential employer is more relevant than what may be contractually or theoretically possible.

Public Comments Can Be Submitted and Viewed Electronically

Comments on the proposed rule must be submitted by October 26, 2020, and can be submitted electronically via the Federal Register website.  The site also provides additional details about the proposed rule and access to the comments submitted to date.  The rule will not go into effect until after the DOL considers the public comments and publishes a final rule.

If finalized, the rule will provide greater clarity, in the context of the FLSA, to businesses that engage independent contractors.  Generally, courts will apply an agency’s rule that reasonably interprets a statute.  However, an agency’s rule can be subject to challenge, for example, if it contradicts the statute in question or the statute directly speaks to the issue.  (See our recent blog post.)  Further, the DOL’s independent contractor rule will not impact other federal agencies’ rules (IRS or NLRB) or state laws that apply more stringent independent contractor classification standards such as the ABC test adopted in several states (e.g., California’s AB 5).

Copyright © 2022, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP. All Rights Reserved.National Law Review, Volume X, Number 288

About this Author

Rebekah Herman Employment Lawyer Hunton AK

Bekah’s practice centers on representing and advising management in labor and employment matters under federal and state law.

Bekah focuses primarily on labor and employment law matters with an emphasis on employment discrimination, workplace harassment, retaliation, wrongful discharge, traditional labor law, non-compete and non-solicitation covenants, wage and hour compliance, family and medical leave compliance, and employment policies, handbooks and contracts.

Bekah is admitted to practice in the US District Courts...

Alan Marcuis Employment Attorney Dallas Hunton AK

Alan represents management in complex labor and employment law matters, including contract, trade secret and post-employment restrictive covenants, EEO litigation, collective bargaining and labor relations.

At Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP, Alan serves as co-head of the Unfair Competition & Information Task Force and Hiring Partner for the firm’s Texas offices. He is a contributing author to the the firm’s Employment & Labor Perspectives blog.

Alan is admitted to practice in the...

214 979 3060 direct