July 28, 2021

Volume XI, Number 209

Advertisement

July 27, 2021

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

July 26, 2021

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

Department of Education Encourages Schools to Exercise Discretion Beyond 2020 Title IX Requirements

The U.S. Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights (OCR) has released its Questions and Answers on the Title IX Regulations on Sexual Harassment (July 2021) and Appendix with sample policies (Q & A), which represents the most extensive discussion to date by OCR under Biden-Harris Administration of the 2020 Title IX amendments enacted by the previous administration.

The Q & A includes new clarifications and information previously provided by OCR after implementation of the 2020 amendments.

According to OCR, the Q & A aims to assist schools, students, and others by highlighting areas in which schools may have discretion in their procedures for responding to reports of sexual harassment. The Q & A emphasizes that the 2020 amendments “set out the minimum steps that a school must take in response to notice of alleged sexual harassment,” and that “[a] school may take additional actions so long as those actions do not conflict with Title IX or the 2020 amendments.”

For example, the Q & A encourages or suggests schools:

  • Undertake prevention efforts that best serve the needs, values, and environment of their own educational communities.

  • Develop and enforce their codes of conduct as an additional tool for ensuring safe and supportive educational environments for all students. (OCR notes that, while it does not enforce codes of conduct, it may investigate complaints that a school’s code of conduct treated students differently based on sex, including sexual orientation or gender identity.)

  • Include examples of their on-campus and off-campus programs and activities in their policies, staff training, and student-oriented communications.

  • Offer supportive measures to a complainant who reports sexual harassment that occurred outside the school’s education program or activity.

  • Determine their own reasonably prompt timeframes for concluding the grievance process for formal complaints, which align with those they have committed to in their grievance processes. (OCR notes nothing in the 2020 amendment prohibits schools from adopting the 60-day time period included in its guidance no longer in place.)

  • Implement rules on how the live hearing is conducted and on rules of decorum, so long as those rules apply equally to all parties.

  • Exercise discretion to make fact-specific determinations about whether to offer informal resolution in response to a complaint, and to adopt the informal resolution process that best serves the needs of its community.

  • For postsecondary institutions, publicize a list of officials with the authority to institute corrective measures on a school’s behalf to assist students and others in understanding which reports will require a school to respond.

The Q & A also explains that, while a respondent may not be presumed responsible, a school “should never assume a complainant … is lying” or that alleged conduct did not occur.

The Q & A explicitly states that the preamble to the 2020 amendments clarifies OCR’s interpretation of Title IX and the regulations, but “the preamble itself does not have the force and effect of law.” The Q & A stresses, “As always, OCR’s enforcement of Title IX stems from Title IX and its implementing regulations, not this or other guidance documents.”

OCR also notes that the Q & A is guided by President Joe Biden’s “Executive Order on Guaranteeing an Educational Environment Free From Discrimination on the Basis of Sex, Including Sexual Orientation or Gender Identity” and “Executive Order on Preventing and Combatting Discrimination on the Basis of Gender Identity or Sexual Orientation.” OCR discusses the Q & A in its blog post.

This Q&A comes after OCR conducted a virtual public hearing on Title IX in June 2021. Over five days, more than 280 students, educators, and other members of the public spoke to OCR on a variety of issues related to Title IX. The 2020 amendments remain in effect while OCR’s comprehensive review of Title IX and its implementing regulations is ongoing.

Summer law clerk Felicia Kalkman contributed to this article.

Jackson Lewis P.C. © 2021National Law Review, Volume XI, Number 202
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

About this Author

Susan D. Friedfel Employment law attorney for educational instituions in White Plains, NY of Jackson Lewis law firm
Principal

Susan D. Friedfel is a Principal in the White Plains and New York, New York, offices of Jackson Lewis P.C.

Ms. Friedfel collaborates with clients to find practical solutions for a variety of issues that arise in the workplace. She counsels clients in various industries, including law firms, financial institutions, educational institutions, and not-for-profit organizations, on a wide array of issues.

Susan D. Friedfel  provides advice and counsel on matters such as:

  • employee recruiting and hiring practices
  • family and medical leave
  • reasonable...
914-872-8027
Monica H. Khetarpal, Litigation Experience, Discrimination, Wage and Hour Violations, Jackson Lewis Law Firm
Principal

Monica H. Khetarpal is a Principal in the Chicago, Illinois, office of Jackson Lewis P.C. Her litigation experience includes cases involving claims for discrimination, harassment, wage and hour violations, FMLA violations, disability discrimination and requests for accommodation in both single plaintiff and class action matters. She regularly handles matters at all levels, from administrative agencies to appeals in both state and federal courts.

Ms. Khetarpal focuses a significant portion of her practice on representing higher education clients and serves as co...

312-803-2529
Carol R. Ashley Labor & Employment Attorney Jackson Lewis Washington, D.C.
Of Counsel

Carol R. Ashley is of counsel in the Washington, D.C. Region office of Jackson Lewis P.C. Her practice focuses on representing employers in workplace law matters, including preventive advice and counseling.

703-483-8300
Of Counsel

Crystal L. Tyler is Of Counsel in the Richmond, Virginia, office of Jackson Lewis P.C. She practices in the areas of employment and higher education, specifically, Title IX.

In her employment practice, Ms. Tyler represents employers in litigation, mediation, and arbitration involving a full range of employment-related claims involving arising under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, the Americans with Disabilities Act, the Family and Medical Leave Act, the Fair Labor Standards Act, and various other federal and state laws. Ms. Tyler also provides counsel and...

804-212-2880
Laura Ahrens Labor & Employment Litigation Attorney Jackson Lewis Law Firm South Carolina
Associate

Laura Ahrens is an associate in the Greenville, South Carolina, office of Jackson Lewis P.C. Laura represents employers in workplace law matters, and enjoys collaborating with her clients to find practical solutions to the variety of issues that arise in the workplace.

Laura is a member of the firm’s General Employment Litigation practice group. She represents employers in various employment and labor matters, including claims of discrimination, harassment, and retaliation brought under Title VII and the ADA. She also...

864-672-8045
Advertisement
Advertisement