January 31, 2023

Volume XIII, Number 31

Advertisement

January 31, 2023

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

January 30, 2023

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis
Advertisement

DFS Settles with Indirect Auto Lenders to Resolve Fair Lending Violations

On June 29, NYDFS announced that two New York-charted banks engaging in indirect auto lending will pay civil money penalties for violating New York’s fair lending law for engaging in practices that resulted in members of protected classes paying higher interest rates that were not based on creditworthiness.  In particular, NYDFS asserts that the practice of allowing “dealer markup” in setting retail interest rates resulted in statistically significant differences in pricing, disadvantaging Hispanic and African-American consumers, with differences ranging from 20 to 59 basis points.

In one of the consent orders, the first bank – which had exited the indirect auto finance business in 2017 – agreed to pay a $275,000 civil money penalty and make a $50,000 contribution to local community development organizations.  But for the other bank that was still operating, the second consent order required the bank to pay a $350,000 civil money penalty, and among other things, adopt a flat-fee pricing model relating to its indirect auto lending.

Putting It Into Practice:  After announcing in 2018 that it intended to pick up where the CFPB left off with fair lending enforcement in the indirect auto finance market, NYDFS continues to significantly impact auto finance companies subject to the agency’s jurisdiction.  And while indirect auto lenders have enjoyed significant relief from the CFPB’s vigorous fair lending enforcement activity from 2013-2016, auto lenders have not been strangers to recent CFPB enforcement actions more generally (see herehere, and here).  Auto lenders continuing to wage regulatory battles on various fronts, including in New York, may find it helpful to reference the NYDFS’ 2018 fair lending compliance guidance document that outlines six key compliance action items to be taken by indirect auto lenders in evaluating and monitoring dealerships from which they buy automobile retail installment contracts, including taking prompt corrective action in connection with instances of improper dealer mark-up.

Copyright © 2023, Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP.National Law Review, Volume XI, Number 188
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

About this Author

Moorari Shah Bankruptcy Lawyer Sheppard Mullin Law Firm
Partner

Moorari Shah is a partner in the Finance and Bankruptcy Practice Group in the firm's Los Angeles and San Francisco offices. 

Areas of Practice

Moorari combines deep in-house and law firm experience to deliver practical, business-minded legal advice. He represents banks, fintechs, mortgage companies, auto lenders, and other nonbank institutions in transactional, licensing, regulatory compliance, and government enforcement matters covering mergers and acquisitions, consumer and commercial lending, equipment finance and leasing, and supervisory examinations,...

213-617-4171
A.J. S. Dhaliwal Bankruptcy Attorney Sheppard Mullin Washington DC
Associate

A.J. is an associate in the Finance and Bankruptcy Practice Group in the firm's Washington, D.C. office. 

A.J. has over a decade of experience helping banks, non-bank financial institutions, and other companies providing financial products and services in a wide range of matters including government enforcement actions, civil litigation, regulatory examinations, and internal investigations.

With a diversified regulatory, compliance, and enforcement background, A.J. counsels financial institutions in matters involving...

202-747-2323
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement