October 22, 2020

Volume X, Number 296

Advertisement

October 22, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

October 21, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

October 20, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

DOL Answers Some Questions About New Federal Paid Leave Law: Many Questions Remain

On March 24, 2020, the Department of Labor Wage and Hour Division issued the Families First Coronavirus Response Act: Questions and Answers (the “Q&A”). The Q&A, which is not law, provides some limited guidance to employers, including the following:

  • Emergency paid sick leave (“EPSL”) and the expanded paid Family and Medical Leave benefits (“Expanded FMLA”) under the Families First Coronavirus Response Act (“FFCRA”) will be available from April 1, 2020, through December 31, 2020. The leave benefits will not be retroactive, and will not apply to leave taken before April 1, 2020.

  • Private sector employers with fewer than 500 employees must provide FFCRA benefits. To determine FFCRA coverage, an employer must count all full- and part-time United States-based employees (i.e., those in any state, the District of Columbia and any U.S. territory), including (a) employees on leave; (b) temporary employees (even if jointly employed by another entity and regardless of which pays the employees); and (c) day laborers supplied by a temporary agency (regardless of which entity pays).

  • An employee may not take more than two weeks of EPSL in total. That is, an employee may not take two weeks of EPSL for the employee’s own COVID-19 illness and then additional EPSL for another qualifying reason, such as to care for a family member who has COVID-19.

  • The amount of daily leave available to a part-time employee is determined by evaluating the employee’s average number of work hours in a two-week period (based on the hours the employee is normally scheduled to work). However, if the part-time employee’s schedule varies or regular hours are unknown, the employer must use a six-month average to calculate daily hours. If the employee has been employed for less than six months, the employer must use the number of hours that the employee and employer agreed the employee would work upon hiring (or, if there was no such agreement, an employer may calculate the hours of available leave based on the average hours per day the employee was scheduled to work over the term of his or her employment).

Notably, the Q&A leaves many critical questions unanswered, including:

  • whether a shelter in place order issued by a state is a “quarantine” or “isolation” order which entitles employees to EPSL;

  • whether an employee who has already taken FMLA leave or exhausted his or her non-emergency FMLA leave entitlement may still take the full 12 weeks of FFCRA Expanded FMLA leave; and 

  • whether EPSL or Expanded FMLA leave may be taken (at the employee’s choice or with the employer’s permission) on an intermittent basis.

In addition, the Q&A refers to counting employees (to determine coverage under the FFCRA) using both joint employer and integrated employer tests. The application of these tests will require a fact-specific analysis to determine whether employees of two separate legal entities, such as subsidiaries of a common parent, should be aggregated for purposes of applying the fewer than 500 employees coverage standard.

© 2020 Vedder PriceNational Law Review, Volume X, Number 85
Advertisement

TRENDING LEGAL ANALYSIS

Advertisement
Advertisement

About this Author

Bruce R. Alper, Vedder Price Law Firm, Labor Employment Attorney
Shareholder

Bruce R. Alper is a shareholder at Vedder Price, where he has practiced management side labor and employment law for over 25 years. An accomplished litigator, Mr. Alper has represented employers in employment disputes of all types in judicial, administrative and arbitral forums. He has years of experience advising employers on matters involving employment discrimination, sexual harassment, wrongful discharge, workforce reductions, labor relations, family/medical leaves and other employment regulatory matters. Mr. Alper represents a wide range of private-sector employers, including...

312-609-7890
Elizabeth N. Hall, Vedder Price Law Firm, Labor Employment Attorney
Shareholder

Elizabeth N. Hall is a shareholder  in the firm’s Labor and Employment Practice Area.  Her experience includes defending employers before state and federal courts and administrative agencies in all types of individual employee and class action labor and employment litigation including equal employment opportunity, wrongful and retaliatory discharge and wage and hour issues.  Ms. Hall has successfully argued procedural and employment discrimination issues in the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, and has particular expertise managing electronic discovery in complex individual plaintiff and class action litigation.

312-609-7795
Thomas G. Hancuch, Employee Benefits Lawyer, Vedder Price law firm
Shareholder

Thomas G. Hancuch is a shareholder at Vedder Price where he represents employers in all aspects of employee benefits, labor and employment law. His practice focuses on employee benefit plan design and administration, benefit claims and litigation; employee relations and benefits aspects of mergers; acquisitions; workforce reductions and outsourcing; leaves of absence and accommodation of employees with disabilities; employment discrimination; harassment and retaliation claims; employee leasing and worker classification; executive compensation; wage and hour laws;...

312-609-7824
Associate

Kathryn A. Rosenbaum is an Associate based in Chicago who focuses her practice in Employment Law. 

Admitted to practice only in Ohio and is supervised by Vedder Price P.C. attorneys licensed in the state of Illinois.

(312) 609 7973
Advertisement
Advertisement