May 31, 2020

May 30, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

May 29, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

May 28, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

DOL Provides Additional Guidance On New Paid Leave Laws

On March 26, 2020, the Department of Labor supplemented its March 24, 2020 Families First Coronavirus Response Act: Questions and Answers (the “Q&A”). While not law, the Q&A provides guidance on how the emergency paid sick leave (“EPSL”) and expanded paid Family and Medical Leave benefits (“Expanded FMLA”) should be offered in accordance with the Families First Coronavirus Response Act (“FFCRA”). The March 26 supplement answers some important questions.

  • The new benefits are not available to employees who are not working because their employer has shut down. If an employee is unable to work before, on or after April 1, 2020 because of a worksite closure or furlough due to a lack of business or because of a “Federal, State or local directive,” which includes the shelter-in-place orders issued by numerous state and local governments, the employee is not entitled to EPSL or Expanded FMLA. However, if on or after April 1, 2020 the employee is receiving EPSL or Expanded FMLA benefits and then the employer shuts down for lack of business, the employee must be paid for the period of EPSL/Expanded FMLA which predates the shutdown. It is the clear intent of the Department of Labor that employees should look to their state unemployment insurance programs (as enhanced by the CARES Act) and not to the new federal paid leave laws, if they are not working because their employer is forced to close for lack of business or a shutdown order.

  • Paid leave benefits cannot be used to compensate for reduced hours. Employees whose hours are reduced because of a lack of work are not entitled to use EPSL or Expanded FMLA to supplement their pay.

  • Paid intermittent leave can be taken in limited situations. EPSL and Expanded FMLA leave may be taken on an intermittent basis, at an increment agreed upon by the employer and employee, if an employee is teleworking. However, an employee who continues to work on-site at the employer must take EPSL in full-day increments unless the reason for EPSL is because the employee’s child’s school or place of child care is closed, or the child care provider is unavailable, in which case intermittent leave may be available if agreed upon by the employer.

  • Employer provided paid time off benefits may be used to augment paid EPSL and Expanded FMLA benefits. If the employee chooses and the employer agrees, an employee may supplement EPSL and/or Expanded FMLA with existing paid time off benefits provided under the employer’s policies to bring the employee up to 100% of the employee’s regular pay for the EPSL/Expanded FMLA period.

  • EPSL documentation. Employees who take EPSL must provide the employer with documentation (i) supporting the need for leave, which would include the reason for leave and a statement that the employee cannot work (including telework) for that reason, and the date when leave is necessary; and (ii) verifying the reason for the leave, such as the “source of any quarantine or isolation order” (which likely must be employee-specific) or documentation from the employee’s health care provider that the employee should self-quarantine. The employer must retain the documentation if it intends to seek a tax credit for the EPSL payments.

  • Expanded FMLA documentation. Employees who take Expanded FMLA must provide the employer with documentation supporting the leave (including for the first two weeks of such leave, which may be unpaid), such as a notice posted on a website or in a newspaper showing the employee’s day care provider or child’s school is closed. Further, if an employee takes leave beyond the two weeks of EPSL because the employee’s COVID-19 infection rises to the level of a “serious health condition” under the FMLA, the employee must provide appropriate FMLA medical certifications if required by the employer.

© 2020 Vedder Price

TRENDING LEGAL ANALYSIS


About this Author

Bruce R. Alper, Vedder Price Law Firm, Labor Employment Attorney
Shareholder

Bruce R. Alper is a shareholder at Vedder Price, where he has practiced management side labor and employment law for over 25 years. An accomplished litigator, Mr. Alper has represented employers in employment disputes of all types in judicial, administrative and arbitral forums. He has years of experience advising employers on matters involving employment discrimination, sexual harassment, wrongful discharge, workforce reductions, labor relations, family/medical leaves and other employment regulatory matters. Mr. Alper represents a wide range of private-sector employers, including...

312-609-7890
Elizabeth N. Hall, Vedder Price Law Firm, Labor Employment Attorney
Shareholder

Elizabeth N. Hall is a shareholder  in the firm’s Labor and Employment Practice Area.  Her experience includes defending employers before state and federal courts and administrative agencies in all types of individual employee and class action labor and employment litigation including equal employment opportunity, wrongful and retaliatory discharge and wage and hour issues.  Ms. Hall has successfully argued procedural and employment discrimination issues in the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, and has particular expertise managing electronic discovery in complex individual plaintiff and class action litigation.

312-609-7795
Associate

Kathryn A. Rosenbaum is an Associate based in Chicago who focuses her practice in Employment Law. 

Admitted to practice only in Ohio and is supervised by Vedder Price P.C. attorneys licensed in the state of Illinois.

(312) 609 7973