September 21, 2020

Volume X, Number 265

September 21, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

September 18, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

EEOC Challenges Yale New Haven Hospital’s “Late Career Practitioner Policy” in Discrimination Suit

The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (the “EEOC”) sued Yale New Haven Hospital (“Hospital”) on February 11, 2020, alleging the hospital is in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. § 621 et. seq., the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. §12101, et. seq., and Title I of the Civil Rights Act of 1991, 42 U.S.C. §1981a, by adopting and implementing a “Late Career Practitioner Policy” in 2016. Specifically, this policy requires any medical provider age 70 and older who applies for, or seeks to renew, medical staff privileges at the hospital to take both an ophthalmologic and a neuropsychological medical examination. The suit alleges medical providers under the age of 70 are not subject to this requirement.

Since the policy’s implementation, the hospital has subjected approximately 145 medical providers, age 70 or older, to these medical examinations, most of whom have passed. The hospital has since disputed the allegations in the lawsuit stating, “Yale New Haven Hospital’s late career practitioner policy is designed to protect our patients from potential harm while including safeguards to ensure that our physicians are treated fairly.” The EEOC, however, believes that “while Yale New Haven Hospital may claim its policy is well-intentioned, it violates antidiscrimination laws…[and] there are many other nondiscriminatory methods already in place to ensure the competence of all of its physicians and other health care providers, regardless of age.”

Specifically, the EEOC contends that the additional medical examinations are solely due to the age of the provider with no particularized suspicion that the provider’s eyesight or neuropsychological ability may have declined. The EEOC believes the policy violates the ADEA because it “subjects employees to the stigma of being singled out due to their age” which ultimately has the “effect of depriving medical providers age 70 and older from equal employment opportunities.” The EEOC also contends that the additional medical examinations violate the ADA’s prohibition against subjecting employees to medical examinations that are not job-related and consistent with business necessity.

The EEOC is seeking a permanent injunction enjoining the hospital from engaging in any employment practice that discriminates based on age, an injunction against the hospital’s Late Career Practitioner Policy, as well as instatement, reinstatement, front pay, back wages, liquidated damages, punitive damages, and costs. It is unclear if the Hospital employs physicians or merely credentials them as independent contractors.

While the EEOC has implied it will continue to scrutinize the adoption and implementation of policies that utilize age-based assumptions, it is not clear how the court will rule.

1 EEOC v. Yale New Haven Hospital Inc., D. Conn., No. 3:20-cv-00187.

2 42 U.S.C. § 12112(d)(4)(A).

© Polsinelli PC, Polsinelli LLP in CaliforniaNational Law Review, Volume X, Number 69

TRENDING LEGAL ANALYSIS


About this Author

Blake H. Reeves Polsinelli Shareholder Academic Medical Centers Health Care Industry Health Care Litigation
Shareholder

Blake Reeves combines the skills he developed as a trial lawyer with a broad knowledge of administrative law and health care regulations to represent health care clients in a variety of reimbursement disputes, government investigations, and administrative actions.

With over 15 years of health care litigation experience, Blake is able to advise clients on the legal implications of their day-to-day business operations in addition to advancing their business and legal interests in civil claims, regulatory investigations, and state agency disputes.

Blake focuses his practice on...

816-374-0560
Adam D. Chilton Associate Health Care Services Health Care Litigation
Associate

Adam is an experienced litigator who believes in developing tailored solutions to unique and often complex legal problems. In the event that litigation becomes unavoidable, Adam utilizes his courtroom experience to fight for clients. 

Adam has experience in: 

  • Assisting health care entities in complex commercial litigation disputes
  • Advising health care entities about their bylaws, policies, and procedures 
  • Advising health care entities on regulatory compliance with governmental entities
  • Advising health care entities in administrative and licensing hearings 

Adam also has experience in a variety of other litigation-related matters and has handled numerous commercial litigation matters in state and federal court. He strives to obtain clients the best possible result in all circumstances.

214.661.5515
David E. Bird Associate Kansas City Health Care Services Health Care Industry
Associate

David Bird is dedicated to providing effective, efficient and innovate legal solutions to health care clients. As an Associate in the Health Care Alignment and Organization practice, David applies his understanding of health care issues towards representing hospitals, physician groups, and other health care professionals and organizations in a variety of health care matters.

816-218-1272