August 3, 2020

Volume X, Number 216

August 03, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

July 31, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

Facebook Status: You’re Fired

The facts may change but the story remains the same.  Employee posts derogatory statements on Facebook.  Employee gets fired.

The most recent example of this occurred in Paterson, New Jersey and involved a first grade teacher.  The teacher posted the following status updates on her Facebook page:

  • I’m not a teacher – I’m a warden for future criminals!
  • They had a scared straight program in school – why couldn’t [I] bring [first] graders?

Viewers of these posts included one of the teacher’s colleagues, who forwarded the posts to her school principal.  The teacher was immediately suspended with pay pending further investigation.  As news leaked regarding her comments, the school received a least a dozen irate phone calls, a protest of 20-25 persons took place outside the school and camera crews from major news organizations descended upon the school.

Tenure charges were then brought against the teacher by the school district.  The teacher argued that her statements were protected by the First Amendment.  The Administrative Law Judge (”ALJ”) assigned to the case rejected this defense.  He noted that her remarks were not a matter of public concern, but rather, merely an expression of dissatisfaction with her job.  The ALJ found that comments, such as those made by the teacher, make it “impossible for parents to cooperate with or have faith in a teacher who insults their children and trivializes legitimate education concerns on the internet.”

The teacher pointed to her spotless employment record as well as her almost thirteen years of service and argued that termination was inappropriate for a mere “momentary lapse in judgment.”  Again the ALJ disagreed.  He found her comments “showed a disturbing lack of self-restraint, violated any notion of good behavior and [acted in a matter that was] inimical to her roles as a professional educator.”  The ALJ’s decision appears to have been based, in large part, on the teacher’s response to the charges.  The ALJ noted that he had expected the teacher to be contrite and express regret over her actions.  Instead, she merely appeared “befuddled by the commotion she had created” and continued to deny that her conduct was inappropriate.  Finding that her actions were grossly inappropriate and her relationship with the Paterson school community “irreparably damaged,” the ALJ concluded the teacher was unfit to continue her duties and dismissed her from her teaching position.  The ALJ opinion was then upheld by the New Jersey Appellate Division for the reasons expressed in the ALJ opinion.

© 2020 Giordano, Halleran & Ciesla, P.C. All Rights Reserved National Law Review, Volume III, Number 18


About this Author

Ari G. Burd, Shareholder, Giordano Law Firm, Labor & Employment, Cannabis Law, Health Care

Ari devotes his time to assisting and defending employers with regard to traditional employment issues. He frequently counsels employers for compliance with New Jersey laws and has extensive transactional and litigation experience.

Ari has litigated employment matters throughout the state, having made appearances in almost every Superior Court in New Jersey, as well as before both Federal District Courts in New Jersey and the Federal and State Courts in New York.  These actions have involved a diverse range of claims such as wrongful discharge, discrimination, harassment,...