May 22, 2022

Volume XII, Number 142

Advertisement
Advertisement

May 20, 2022

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis
Advertisement

Fair Use or Foul Play?

The Supreme Court’s imminent decision in the Warhol matter will determine whether a series of Andy Warhol prints created from a Lynn Smith photograph of music legend Prince infringes Smith’s copyright.  The Court will either provide valuable guidance, or further confuse the analysis, of fair use under the Copyright Act.

We previously reported on the Warhol case against Prince when the Second Circuit Court of Appeals decided the Warhol prints were not a fair use of the Smith photo.  The Second Circuit held Warhol’s prints did not “transform” the original Smith photograph by conveying a different meaning or message from the original because it is “recognizably derive[d] from the photo. The courts currently split on how to determine whether a work is “transformative” and whether the meaning of a purportedly transformative work should even be considered if the accused infringer slavishly copies the original. Indeed, the Second Circuit overruled a district court ruling that the Warhol prints were transformative because they depicted Prince as “an iconic, larger than life” figure rather than, as shown in the original, a “vulnerable uncomfortable one.”

The Copyright Act sets forth multiple factors for determining whether a work is fair use but does not specifically set forth an exception for “transformative” works—this doctrine was created by the courts. Specifically, the statute sets forth the following factors which must be balanced in determining if a work is fair use or an infringement:

  • The purpose and character of the accused infringer’s use;

  • The nature of the work being copied;

  • The amount and substantiality of the work taken by the accused infringer; and

  • · The effect of the use on the potential market for the work.

The question for the Warhol Court is whether the “purpose and character” of the Warhol prints overrides the amount of the Smith photograph taken in creating them. Please visit us again when we report on its decision and the scope of its impact on the fair use doctrine.

©2022 Norris McLaughlin P.A., All Rights ReservedNational Law Review, Volume XII, Number 133
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

About this Author

Jeanne Hamburg IP Attorney Norris McLaughlin New York
Member

Jeanne Hamburg concentrates her practice in all aspects of copyright and trademark law, both in litigation and in the transactional area.  Resident in the New York City office, she assists clients in a broad range of industries with their IP needs.  In each year since 2009, Jeanne has been recognized in New York Super Lawyers® for Intellectual Property and Intellectual Property Litigation. Only five percent of New York attorneys are given this honor. Additionally, Jeanne is ranked in the 2019 World Trademark Review 1000 – The World’s Leading Trademark...

917-369-8894
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement