June 9, 2023

Volume XIII, Number 160

Advertisement
Advertisement

June 08, 2023

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

June 07, 2023

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

June 06, 2023

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis
Advertisement

Federal Trade Commission Proposes Broad Ban on Use of Non-Compete Covenants

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking to broadly ban the use of non-compete covenants throughout the country.

The proposed rule, which would supersede all contrary state laws, is remarkable for its sweeping definition of “non-compete clauses” that fall within the ban. The ban would extend to “de facto” non-compete clauses — i.e., contractual provisions that have the effect of prohibiting workers from seeking or accepting employment or operating a business after the conclusion of the worker’s current employment. In this regard, the ban may implicate broadly drafted non-disclosure of confidential information restrictions and repayment of training costs provisions. The ban could also implicate non-solicitation of customer restrictions, depending on the surrounding facts.

If adopted, the proposed rule will require all employers that use any agreement with a non-compete clause (or with a clause that could be deemed a non-compete clause under the definition in the proposed rule) to take action to rescind the non-compete clause. Any provision negotiated in exchange for the non-compete (for example, a severance provision) would remain intact. This recission action will require individualized communications from the employer to all current employees, as well as former employees.

While the proposed rule contains a sale-of-business exception, even that is exceptionally narrow and limited to individuals who owned at least 25 percent of the ownership interest in the business.

In his July 9, 2021, Executive Order, President Joe Biden encouraged the FTC to engage in rulemaking to “curtail the unfair use of non-compete clauses and other clauses or agreements that may unfairly limit worker mobility.” Although Biden’s use of the phrase “unfair use of non-compete clauses” suggested that, perhaps, there could be a “fair” use, the FTC’s outright ban suggests otherwise.

The Notice of Proposed Rulemaking permits the public to submit comments by March 10, 2023 (within 60 days after publication of the proposed rule in the Federal Register). A final rule will then be issued.

Legal challenges to the rule are expected.

Jackson Lewis P.C. © 2023National Law Review, Volume XIII, Number 6
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

About this Author

Clifford R. Atlas Protection Against Unfair Competition Attorney Jackson Lewis New York, NY
Principal

Clifford Atlas is a Principal in the New York City, New York, office of Jackson Lewis P.C. He is the Co-Leader of the Non-Competes and Protection Against Unfair Competition Practice Group.

Mr. Atlas works extensively with clients in developing and drafting employment contracts and restrictive covenant agreements, and developing programs to best protect clients’ confidential business information. He has significant experience in prosecuting as well as defending actions involving breach of non-competition and non-solicitation agreements, employee raiding,...

212-545-4017
Erik J. Winton, Jackson Lewis, Principal, Retaliation Lawyer, restrictive covenant drafting attorney
Principal

Erik J. Winton is a Principal in the Boston, Massachusetts, office of Jackson Lewis P.C. He is the Co-Leader of the firm's Non-Competes and Protection Against Unfair Competition practice group. His practice focuses on restrictive covenant drafting, counseling, litigation avoidance and litigation. He regularly provides valuable counsel to clients in New England and across the country regarding these issues.

Mr. Winton has extensive experience as a litigator, including successful first chair jury trial experience. He represents employers in...

617-367-0025
Principal

Daniel J. Doron is a principal in the New York City, New York, office of Jackson Lewis P.C. Dan focuses his practice on the labor and employment aspects of M&A transactions, both on the buy-side and sell-side. He has advised private equity clients, as well as strategic acquirers, in hundreds of transactions.

Dan helps clients to formulate strategies to structure and integrate workforces in ways that will advance their objectives. Dan identifies employment-related risks, helps clients assess the materiality of the...

212-545-4026