July 3, 2020

Volume X, Number 185

July 02, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

July 01, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

June 30, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

Fee Shifting Bill Dies While Nevada Legislature Continues To Mull Other Corporate Law Amendments

Last month, I noted the introduction of a bill, SB 304, in the Nevada legislature that would authorize fee shifting.  The bill, however, enjoyed only a brief moment in the legislative sun.  It never passed out of committee and recently died pursuant to Joint Standing Rule No. 14.3.1 of the Nevada legislature.

In the meantime another bill amending Nevada's private corporation law is progressing towards enactment.  SB 427 would, among other things, allow a majority of the voting power of directors to remove a director if "a court of competent jurisdiction, or other governmental entity or regulatory agency with authority over the corporation requires, without providing any other reasonable and practicable alternative, that any specified director of a corporation cease to be a director in order for the corporation to obtain, or avoid the suspension, conditioning or revocation of, any permit, license, registration, franchise, finding of suitability or similar authorization or approval required for the conduct of all or any material portion of the business of the corporation or any of its  affiliates taken as a whole and such requirement is not appealable or has otherwise become final after declination or exhaustion of  all appeals therefrom".  

Although the proposed director removal provision does not name any specific regulatory agency, the drafters undoubtedly had in mind the Nevada's gaming authorities who have the power to determine the "suitability" of directors, officers, key employees and significant stockholders.  If the authorities find that an officer, director or key employee is unsuitable, the corporation would have to sever all relationships with that person in order to maintain its gaming license.  However, Nevada's private corporation law generally requires a vote of 2/3 of the voting power to remove a director.  NRS 78.335.  A corporation that cannot muster the requisite vote will find itself in a bind if a director refuses to resign after being deemed "unsuitable".  The amendment contemplated by SB 427 would address this potential problem.


© 2010-2020 Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP National Law Review, Volume IX, Number 112


About this Author

Keith Paul Bishop, Corporate Transactions Lawyer, finance securities attorney, Allen Matkins Law Firm

Keith Paul Bishop is a partner in Allen Matkins' Corporate and Securities practice group, and works out of the Orange County office. He represents clients in a wide range of corporate transactions, including public and private securities offerings of debt and equity, mergers and acquisitions, proxy contests and tender offers, corporate governance matters and federal and state securities laws (including the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the Dodd-Frank Act), investment adviser, financial services regulation, and California administrative law. He regularly advises clients...