August 12, 2022

Volume XII, Number 224


August 11, 2022

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

August 10, 2022

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

August 09, 2022

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

FEMA Relief for Hospitals and Health Systems: What’s Covered and How to Apply

On March 13, 2020, President Donald Trump issued emergency declarations for all states, tribes, territories and the District of Columbia under the Stafford Act in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. This unprecedented declaration made Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Public Assistance funding available. Congress appropriated an additional $45 billion for FEMA’s Disaster Relief Fund (referred to as Public Assistance funds). 

On June 5, 2020 FEMA released the Disaster Relief Fund: Monthly Report, which included funding details through May 2020. As of May 31, nearly $10.2 billion had been obligated to support COVID-19 related expenses, leaving approximately $75 billion in the Disaster Relief Fund for the remainder of the 2020 fiscal year.

As hospitals and health systems face financial difficulty navigating this pandemic, they should consider seeking these Public Assistance funds for costs associated with COVID-19-related expenses. Successful grant applicants can receive funding to cover 75% of the eligible expenses. Below we will discuss the scope of eligible expenses, the application process and audit considerations.

Eligibility: Who Can Apply?

Public Assistance funds are available to nonprofit organizations operating an “eligible facility” or an “eligible service,” including:

  • Hospitals

  • Outpatient facilities

  • Rehabilitation facilities

  • Long term care facilities

Each nonprofit organization must have an Internal Revenue Service (IRS) ruling letter granting its tax-exempt status under the Internal Revenue Code or have documentation from the state showing that it is non-revenue producing and operates as a nonprofit under state law. 

Scope of Funding: What Can Be reimbursed? 

There are two main categories of expenses incurred by hospitals and health systems due to the COVID-19 pandemic that are eligible for FEMA Public Assistance funds — protective measures and non-congregate sheltering. 

Eligible Protective Measures 

FEMA may reimburse eligible emergency protective measures taken to respond to an emergency at the direction or guidance of public health officials. FEMA and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) will coordinate final reimbursement to ensure that federal agencies, including the HHS and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), do not provide duplicate assistance. 

As announced by FEMA on March 19, 2020, the emergency protective measures that may be eligible for assistance include, but are not limited to: 

  • Management, control and reduction of immediate threats to public health and safety:

    • Emergency Operation Center costs

    • Training specific to the declared event

    • Disinfection of eligible public facilities

    • Technical assistance to state, tribal, territorial or local governments on emergency management and control of immediate threats to public health and safety

  • Emergency medical care:

    • Non‐deferrable medical treatment of infected persons in a shelter or temporary medical facility

    • Related medical facility services and supplies

    • Temporary medical facilities and/or enhanced medical/hospital capacity (for treatment when existing facilities are reasonably forecasted to become overloaded in the near term and cannot accommodate the patient load or to quarantine potentially infected persons)

    • Use of specialized medical equipment

    • Medical waste disposal

    • Emergency medical transport

  • Medical sheltering (e.g. when existing facilities are reasonably forecasted to become overloaded in the near future and cannot accommodate needs)

    • All sheltering must be conducted in accordance with standards and/or guidance approved by HHS/CDC and must be implemented in a manner that incorporates social distancing measures

    • Non‐congregate medical sheltering is subject to prior approval by FEMA and is limited to that which is reasonable and necessary to address the public health needs of the event, is pursuant to the direction of appropriate public health officials and does not extend beyond the duration of the Public Health Emergency

  • Household pet sheltering and containment actions related to household pets in accordance with CDC guidelines

  • Purchase and distribution of food, water, ice, medicine and other consumable supplies, to include personal protective equipment and hazardous material suits movement of supplies and persons

  • Security and law enforcement

  • Communications of general health and safety information to the public

  • Search and rescue to locate and recover members of the population requiring assistance

  • Reimbursement for state, tribe, territory and/or local government force account overtime costs

Eligible Non-Congregate Sheltering 

FEMA has also recognized that establishing non-congregate shelteringmay be necessary during the COVID-19 pandemic and may reimburse these costs. FEMA’s Regional Administrators have been delegated authority to approve requests for non-congregate sheltering for the duration of the COVID-19 pandemic. Before establishing non-congregate sheltering, the following considerations should be taken into account: 

  • The non-congregate sheltering must be at the direction of and documented through an official order signed by a state, local, tribal or territorial public health official.

  • Any approval is limited to that which is reasonable and necessary to address the public health needs of the event and should not extend beyond the duration of the Public Health Emergency.

  • Applicants must follow FEMA’s Procurement Under Grants Conducted Under Exigent or Emergency Circumstances guidance and include a termination for convenience clause in their contracts.

  • Prior to approval, the applicant must provide an analysis of the implementation options that were considered and a justification for the option selected.

  • The funding for non-congregate sheltering to meet the needs of the Public Health Emergency cannot be duplicated by another federal agency, including the HHS or CDC.

  • Applicable Environmental and Historic Preservation laws, regulations and executive orders apply and must be adhered to as a condition of assistance.

Application Process: How Do We Start?

FEMA announced a simplified application process for Public Assistance funding on March 23, 2020. The agency has posted multiple related guidance documents, the most important of which is “Submitting a Public Assistance Funding Request for COVID-19: FEMA Public Assistance COVID-19 Streamlined Project Application” (Streamlined Project Application document). This document, which FEMA last updated April 10, 2020, contains three pages of details and considerations relevant to applicants before, during and after application submission. The remaining thirty pages in the document contain a copy of the actual Streamlined Project Application, which all applicants must complete online through the Public Assistance Grants Portal

The Streamlined Project Application document should be the primary resource for applicants navigating the application process. However, as Exhibit 1 illustrates, there are steps that all applicants must take both before and after submitting the actual Streamlined Project Application. 

Exhibit 1: Streamlined Application Process Steps

FEMA Alert Image 1

The first three pages of the Streamlined Project Application document cover or at least reference many pre- and post-application details. For any gaps that remain, FEMA has also published a variety of Quick Guides and a series of detailed video tutorials. Exhibit 2 contains a listing of these resources, along with a brief description of each resource.

Exhibit 2: Additional Guidance Documents

Guidance (with link)


Coronavirus (COVID-19) Pandemic: Public Assistance Simplified Application

  • Released March 23, 2020

  • A fact sheet with a basic overview of the simplified process 

  • Contains a link to the Grants Portal, as well as a link to the video tutorial listed below

Grants Portal - RPA Submission 

  • Posted March 20, 2020

  • A video tutorial with steps on how to submit a Request for Public Assistance (RPA)

  • The FEMA fact sheet above links to this video

FEMA PA Grants Portal - Grants Manager Channel (YouTube)

  • Instructional videos posted March 20, 2020 to May 14, 2020

  • There are 17 videos posted to date, all providing guidance related to the Grants Portal and Public Assistance applications

Grants Portal Account and Request for Public Assistance: Public Assistance Applicant Quick Guide 

  • Last updated March 28, 2020

  • A document explaining the steps an applicant must take in creating a Public Assistance (PA) Grants Portal user account and submitting RPAs 

  • Applicants must complete both steps before submitting the Streamlined Project Application

COVID-19 Process Overview: Public Assistance Applicant Quick Guide 

  • Dated April 10, 2020

  • This Quick Guide provides an overview of the Streamlined Public Assistance process for applicants seeking assistance under COVID-19 declarations

Completing and Submitting the COVID-19 Streamlined Project Application: Public Assistance Applicant Quick Guide

  • Dated April 10, 2020

  • This Quick Guide provides step-by-step guidance for applicants on completing and submitting the COVID-19 Streamlined Project Application, including tracking and monitoring the status of submitted projects 

To familiarize with the FEMA staff perspective during the streamlined application process, applicants can also review the document “COVID-19 Process Overview: Public Assistance FEMA Job Aid.” The introductory language suggests that this Job Aid is intended for FEMA staff, but the Massachusetts state government posted it on the state’s COVID-19 Federal Disaster Declaration webpage.

FEMA Audit Considerations: How Do Hospitals and Health Systems Make Sure They Are Following the Rules?

FEMA carefully audits grant recipients to ensure that allocated FEMA funds were spent in accordance with federal rules. If a recipient is found to have misused funding, FEMA can de-obligate the grant and require the recipient to repay the money.

Hospital and health systems receiving FEMA funding should consider the following:

Procurement Requirements

FEMA grant recipients must adhere to certain federal procurement requirements when contracting for FEMA work. Failure to comply with the procurement requirements can lead to penalties, including de-obligation of portions of FEMA funding associated with the violation. FEMA takes procurement compliance seriously and has de-obligated portions of funds from grant recipients in the past. 

As an example, a regional hospital in Ohio secured FEMA funding to help repair damage from severe storms and flooding in May and June of 2008. In 2017, after an investigation by the Office of Inspector General (OIG), FEMA de-obligated approximately $9.6 million in federal funding from Columbus Regional Hospital based on procurement violations that occurred. 

Accounting and Documentation 

FEMA grant recipients must account for FEMA grant funds according to federal regulations and FEMA guidelines. Generally, any expenditures must be supported by appropriate documentation specific to the project for which the funds were awarded. Organizations receiving FEMA assistance should ensure they have appropriate source documentation of all expenditures of FEMA funds and maintain a centralized expenditure tracking system. 

Documentation and an active accounting system should track all expenditures of FEMA funding. OIG audits of FEMA funding identify unsupported costs, excessive charges, unrelated project costs and poor accounting as reasons for de-obligation of funds. 

Prohibition of Duplication of Benefits

FEMA funds cannot duplicate assistance received from insurance claims, other assistance programs, legal awards or other benefits associated with properties or damage that is the subject of litigation. Any duplicated funds must be returned, and FEMA may adjust the reimbursement or de-obligate the duplicated funds. 

To mitigate the risk of duplicating funds, organizations should apply more specific funds to grants received for more specific programs. For example, FEMA funds are available only for certain COVID-19 related expenses, while funds from the Provider Relief Fund can be applied more broadly to offset losses related to COVID-19.

FEMA Alert Image 2

Duplication of benefits is also a common issue with insurance claims. FEMA requires grant recipients to file insurance claims to cover damage but does not require recipients to seek additional funding. Nevertheless, the recipient must report other benefits received relating to the property, including applications for other assistance, insurance proceeds or any additional compensation.

Donated funds from third parties provided for the same purpose as the FEMA funds may be applied to the non-federal cost share and are not considered a duplication of benefits if the following conditions are met: 

  • The donated resource is from a third-party (a private entity or individual that is not a paid employee of the Applicant or Federal, State, Territorial or Tribal government).

  • The donated resource is necessary and reasonable for accomplishment of the project.

  • The applicant uses the resource in the performance of eligible work and within the respective project’s period of performance.

  • The applicant or volunteer organization tracks the resources and work performed, including description, specific locations and hours. Donated resources for Permanent Work (PW) must be tracked to the specific PW for which it is associated.

Failure to track and report duplicated benefits may result in de-obligation of FEMA funds. In 2009, FEMA de-obligated $1.5 million of federal funds from a California-based community health system due to a failure to report a duplication of benefits associated with FEMA funding awarded for repairs following the Northridge earthquake in January of 1994. Similarly, a hospital in California received over $8 million in FEMA funds, but failed to recover the full $50 million face amount of its insurance property and failed to equitably allocate proceeds to all insured properties. This duplication of benefits was one of four reasons FEMA cited as its rationale for de-obligating over $1.5 million of allocated funding.

© 2022 Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP. All Rights Reserved.National Law Review, Volume X, Number 167

About this Author

Steve Lokensgard Healthcare Lawyer Faegre Drinker Law Firm Minneapolis

Steve Lokensgard leverages over 30 years of legal experience to advise health care clients on regulatory compliance issues, investigations and transactions. He is the firm’s authority on Medicare billing compliance and reimbursement issues, and he regularly advises clients on provider enrollment and licensing issues. He has also developed special expertise in digital health and pharmacy issues. And he has drafted and negotiated professional service agreements for cardiology, pathology, anesthesiology and other specialty providers. As a former compliance officer, he counsels clients on...

612 766 8863
David O. Ault Health Care Attorney Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath Washington, D.C.

Drawing from his background in leadership positions with the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), Dave Ault advises health care providers and payers on the regulatory, compliance and litigation aspects of health insurance. A former government litigator and authority on alternative payment models under the Affordable Care Act (ACA), Dave brings an insider’s understanding to the regulatory challenges and opportunities in the ever-changing health insurance space.

His practice focuses on regulatory and compliance issues relating to Medicare and Medicaid reimbursement,...

Winnie R. McBride Health Care Attorney Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath Washington, D.C.

Winnie McBride* counsels health care clients on strategic and operational matters, including transactions, corporate governance and regulatory compliance. Winnie drafts and reviews contract provisions and advises on data privacy matters, including patient privacy issues arising under HIPAA/HITECH.

While in law school, Winnie served as a research assistant for George Rutherglen and was a summer associate at Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP. She also served as a legal intern at the United States Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia, Washington, D.C., where she...

Alex Eschenroeder Health Care Attorney Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath Minneapolis, MN

Alex Eschenroeder partners with health care stakeholders to manage the legal, regulatory and policy issues that impact their organization. A research consultant for federal clients at a health care consulting firm based in the Washington, D.C., area before entering law school, Alex brings a strong understanding of the health care regulatory and policy landscape to every client engagement.

While earning his J.D. at the University of Minnesota Law School, Alex served as co-president of the Health Law & Bioethics Student Association, note and comment editor for the Minnesota...

Caroline R. Herion Health Care Transactions Attorney Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath Chicago, IL

Caroline Herion advises clients on regulatory and compliance issues related to healthcare transactions. She has also assisted with pharmaceutical product liability cases and prepared strategic memos on the intersection of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act and the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR).

While attending Emory University School of Law, Caroline was a legal extern at the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia and a summer associate at Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP. She was also a summer legal intern at the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services,...