July 12, 2020

Volume X, Number 194

July 10, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

July 09, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

The First Case on ‘Perceived Disability’

Mrs. Coffey is the first person to successfully bring a claim for direct discrimination based on 'perceived' disability under the Equality Act 2010.

An individual is considered "disabled" under s.6 of the Equality Act 2010 if they have a physical or mental impairment that has a substantial negative effect on their ability to do normal, day-to-day activities for 12 months or more. Disability can also cover a 'progressive condition', which gets worse over time.


When Mrs. Coffey first applied to be a police constable, she suffered a hearing impediment, meaning that she fell slightly short of the national police standards for hearing. However, she passed a 'practical functionality' test, which meant she was able to join the force with reasonable adjustments. When Mrs. Coffey applied to transfer to another Constabulary some time later, she had an updated hearing test that showed there had been no change in her hearing ability, but she was not put forward to sit another practical functionality test. The Acting Chief Inspector rejected Mrs. Coffey's application on the basis that she did not meet the hearing standards.

Mrs. Coffey lodged a claim for direct discrimination against the Acting Chief, arguing that she had "perceived" Mrs. Coffey to be disabled and rejected her application on that basis. The Acting Chief disagreed and argued that at the time she didn't believe Mrs. Coffey suffered from a disability. She rejected the application because of the strain on resources and she couldn't justify hiring someone who may not be able to carry out all of their duties.


The Employment Appeals Tribunal (EAT) considered that the Acting Chief 'perceived' that Mrs. Coffey had a 'progressive condition'. They noted that a person with the same abilities as Mrs. Coffey, who the Acting Chief did not perceive had a condition that was likely to get worse, would not have been treated in the same way.


Mrs. Coffey's case confirms that it is possible to succeed in a claim for perceived disability discrimination; however, the employee needs to establish that the discriminator (the Acting Chief in this case) perceived that the individual had a disability within the Equality Act definition at the time of the decision.

©2020 Katten Muchin Rosenman LLPNational Law Review, Volume VIII, Number 40


About this Author

Christopher Hitchins, Katten Muchin London UK, investment documentation attorney, labor disputes management lawyer

Christopher Hitchins focuses his practice on the full range of employment law issues, acting for employers or senior individuals in a wide range of sectors, with a particular focus on the financial services, technology, hotel, retail and media industries.

Chris advises on all contentious and non-contentious UK employment law matters. He has significant experience advising on senior executive employment, partnership and investment documentation, managing disputes and exits as well as team moves, advising businesses on restructurings involving the...

44 (0) 20 7776 7663
Bridgitte Weaver, Katten Law Firm, London, Labor and Employment Litigation Attorney

Brigitte is an employment lawyer who focuses on a broad range of contentious and non-contentious employment matters, acting for both employers and individuals. Brigitte’s contentious experience covers both Employment Tribunal claims and High Court litigation, including unfair dismissal, discrimination claims and breach of contract. Her non-contentious experience covers a variety of advisory matters, as well as corporate support work and advising on TUPE.