May 26, 2022

Volume XII, Number 146

Advertisement
Advertisement

May 26, 2022

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

May 25, 2022

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

May 24, 2022

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

FTC Says the Holder Rule Does Not Prevent State Law From Requiring Payment of Costs or Attorneys’ Fees Against Loan Holders

On January 20, the FTC issued an advisory opinion clarifying that the Holder Rule does not prevent state law from providing costs or attorneys’ fees against loan holders, contrary to the conclusions drawn by some courts. The FTC approved the adoption of the advisory opinion unanimously.

The FTC adopted the Holder Rule to protect consumers when they make purchases using credit. The Rule protects the consumer’s right to assert claims and defense against holders of loans and credit sales contracts even if the loans or contracts are later sold to a third party. The Holder Rule requires sellers that finance sales to include a notice in credit contracts alerting consumers to the claims and defenses available to them in the event of seller misconduct.

When loan holders unsuccessfully dispute claims or defenses covered by the Holder Rule, consumers may seek to have their court costs and attorneys’ fees covered by the loan holder. Some courts have incorrectly asserted that the Holder’s Rule preempts state laws authorizing attorneys’ fee award against loan holders.

In its advisory opinion, the FTC has clarified that the Holder Rule does not eliminate any rights that a consumer may have under separate state, local, or federal law. Consequently, whether costs and attorneys’ fees may be awarded against the holder of a loan or credit contract is determined by relevant state law and is not preempted by the Holder Rule. Further, The Holder Rule does not impose a cap on costs or attorneys’ fees.

Putting It Into Practice: The clarity provided by FTC’s advisory opinion serves to further underscore the power of the Holder Rule in providing protection for consumers against loan holders. The FTC has made clear that the Holder Rule not only provides consumers with rights of action against purchasers of their loans and credit contracts, but also does not impose limits on their ability to recover court costs and attorneys’ fees in the event they succeed. Financial services companies, including indirect lenders in the business of financing sales, should ensure that their business practices are in compliance with the Holder Rule, taking into account potential exposure for attorneys’ fees and court costs in the event that they are subject to liability under the Holder Rule.

Copyright © 2022, Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP.National Law Review, Volume XII, Number 25
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

About this Author

Moorari Shah Bankruptcy Lawyer Sheppard Mullin Law Firm
Partner

Moorari Shah is a partner in the Finance and Bankruptcy Practice Group in the firm's Los Angeles and San Francisco offices. 

Areas of Practice

Moorari combines deep in-house and law firm experience to deliver practical, business-minded legal advice. He represents banks, fintechs, mortgage companies, auto lenders, and other nonbank institutions in transactional, licensing, regulatory compliance, and government enforcement matters covering mergers and acquisitions, consumer and commercial lending, equipment finance and leasing, and supervisory examinations,...

213-617-4171
A.J. S. Dhaliwal Bankruptcy Attorney Sheppard Mullin Washington DC
Associate

A.J. is an associate in the Finance and Bankruptcy Practice Group in the firm's Washington, D.C. office. 

A.J. has over a decade of experience helping banks, non-bank financial institutions, and other companies providing financial products and services in a wide range of matters including government enforcement actions, civil litigation, regulatory examinations, and internal investigations.

With a diversified regulatory, compliance, and enforcement background, A.J. counsels financial institutions in matters involving...

202-747-2323
Katie Daw Government Investigations Attorney Sheppard Mullin Law Firm
Associate

Katie’s practice focuses on government investigations into antitrust and competition issues and antitrust litigation.

Prior to joining the firm, Katie completed internships with United States Senator Dianne Feinstein and with United Kingdom Member of Parliament Graham Allen, for whom she conducted nutritional poverty research and drafted initiatives. She also served as a law clerk for the Baltimore Police Department, where she focused on compliance with the city’s consent decree entered into with the Department of Justice.  

202-747-2191
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement