August 5, 2020

Volume X, Number 218

August 04, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

August 03, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

Hydro Newsletter - Volume 6, Issue 12

President Trump’s Nominee for FERC Commissioner Advances

On November 19, 2019, the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee approved the nomination of James Danly, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission’s (FERC or Commission) General Counsel, to be a member of the Commission.  The 12-8 vote was largely on party lines, with only Democratic Senator Joe Manchin of West Virginia joining the Republican majority.  If confirmed, Mr. Danly will be the fourth member of the Commission and the third Republican, the maximum number of Commissioners permitted from one party.  Confirmation of Mr. Danly will leave the Commission one short of a full slate of five.  As previously discussed, the nomination of Mr. Danly departs from the typical practice in such circumstances of nominating a Republican and a Democrat together.  The next step in the confirmation process will be a vote of the entire Senate, which has not yet been scheduled by Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell.

FERC Staff Identifies Cyber Security Program Priorities

At the Commission’s November 21, 2019 open meeting, FERC staff made a presentation addressing the Commission’s efforts to respond to cybersecurity challenges.  The presentation identified organizational changes, including a new security-focused group composed of physical and cybersecurity specialists within the Office of Energy Projects’ Division of Dam Safety and Inspections (D2SI).  The intent of the action is to allow D2SI dam safety engineers to remain focused on dam safety while the new cybersecurity group focuses on physical and cybersecurity concerns.  Its responsibilities will include:

  • Maintaining technical expertise, mentoring, and performing as team leaders for analyses and resolution of cyber and physical security issues;

  • Performing special security inspections, both physical and cyber, and participating as an evaluator during security exercises; and

  • Conducting surveys and risk analyses to assess security needs, identifying vulnerabilities and ensuring effective implementation of protection measures.

In addition to establishing the new cybersecurity group in D2SI, the Commission’s Office of Electric Reliability, which helps FERC oversee reliability standards for the bulk power transmission grid, will establish a division focused exclusively on cybersecurity.

Decision on Petition for Certiorari in Hoopa Valley Tribe Case Expected

On August 26, 2019, California Trout and Trout Unlimited filed a petition for a writ of certiorari with the U.S. Supreme Court to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit’s January 25, 2019 decision in Hoopa Valley Tribe v. FERC.  Briefing on the petition is now complete.  The case has been set for conference on December 6, 2019, at which time the Justices are expected to decide whether to grant the petition.  In most cases, the disposition of a petition discussed at a conference of the Justices is announced the Monday after the conference, which would be December 9.

FERC Reaffirms Requirement to Include All State Water Quality Certification Conditions in Licenses, Even When a Condition Is Unenforceable

On November 21, 2019, FERC issued an order on rehearing of an order issuing a new license for the Eugene Water and Electric Board’s (EWEB) Smith Hydroelectric Project.  The license order incorporated all of the conditions of the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality’s (ODEQ) Clean Water Act Section 401 Water Quality Certification (WQC) except Condition 12, which requires EWEB to pay fees to ODEQ and the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW) to recover costs of overseeing EWEB’s implementation of the WQC.  Condition 12 was excluded on the basis that it is inconsistent with Federal Power Act (FPA) Sections 10(e) and 17, pursuant to which FERC collects annual charges from licensees to reimburse the United States for the costs of administering the FPA.  On rehearing, ODEQ and ODFW advanced several arguments in support of their request that FERC include Condition 12 in the license.  FERC granted rehearing and modified the license order to include Condition 12 on the basis that it was required to do so, but reaffirmed its statement in the license order that, because the funding measure is contrary to the terms of the FPA, FERC cannot enforce Condition 12.  Under the Environmental Protection Agency’s proposed revisions to its Section 401 regulations, FERC would solely be responsible for enforcing Section 401 conditions once they are incorporated into a license, so it remains to be seen how a state would enforce a 401 condition that FERC deems to be unenforceable.

© 2020 Van Ness Feldman LLPNational Law Review, Volume IX, Number 336


About this Author

John H. Clements, Van Ness Feldman Law Firm, Washington DC, Energy and Environmental Law Attorney
Of Counsel

John Clements counsels and represents the firm’s clients before administrative agencies and the courts in matters pertaining principally to regulation of hydroelectric projects under the Federal Power Act, Clean Water Act, Endangered Species Act, National Historic Preservation Act, and National Environmental Policy Act. John is currently involved in major hydroelectric relicensing proceedings before the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), as well as development of new projects, and license implementation and compliance. John is a regular panelist at conferences...

Sharon White, Van Ness Feldman Law Firm, Washington DC, Energy and Environmental Law Attorney
Of Counsel

Sharon represents a broad range of clients on issues relating to the regulation of hydroelectric projects before the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, federal and state regulatory agencies, and the U.S. Courts of Appeal.  She has significant experience providing counsel on licensing and environmental matters under Part I of the Federal Power Act, the National Environmental Policy Act, Endangered Species Act, Clean Water Act, and other statutes affecting energy development.  In addition, Sharon regularly represents clients’ interests in a range of hydroelectric regulatory proceedings, including licensing and relicensing, preliminary permits, license transfers and amendments, and compliance matters.  On behalf of the hydroelectric industry, Sharon has prepared amicus curiae briefs before several U.S. Courts of Appeal and the U.S. Supreme Court.  Sharon also represents a large group of hydroelectric licensees in challenges to federal agencies’ annual charges for costs incurred in administering Part I of the FPA.