August 5, 2020

Volume X, Number 218

August 05, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

August 04, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

August 03, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

Illinois Courts to Require Redaction of Personal Identity Information

While employers as a rule know that they must take reasonable measures to protect personnel records from unnecessary disclosures in the course of business, when employment litigation arises there are myriad records that may become subject to disclosure in discovery, including personnel records of the plaintiff as well as individuals who are not parties to the case, such as decision-makers and comparators in employment discrimination cases.  Protective Orders can be entered to govern the use and protection of confidential information during the pre-trial discovery phase of litigation. But the principal of open access to court records can make protection of sensitive personnel information more complex if a record must be used as an exhibit that is to be filed in court or used at trial.  With so many court records now readily accessible through electronic means, and the risk of identity theft an ever-present risk to society, employment counsel must be ever more vigilant in protecting information from unnecessary disclosure.

In Illinois, newly adopted Illinois Supreme Court Rule 138, which is effective Jan. 1, 2013, mandates that in civil cases “personal identity information shall not be included in documents or exhibits filed with the court.” The stated purpose of the rule is to protect information from disclosure that could provide the potential for identity theft, with the committee comments specifically noting that financial disclosures in family law cases must remain confidential to protect privacy interests. Personal identity information under Rule 138 includes an individual’s social security number, date of birth, mother’s maiden name, driver’s license number, financial account numbers, and debit and credit card numbers.  A court may order other types of information redacted or filed confidentially if consistent with the new rule. If personal identity information is disclosed, an affected individual can bring a motion to request that the personal identity information be redacted.  If the court finds the inclusion of personal identity information in a court filing was willful, the court may award the prevailing party reasonable expenses, including attorney fees and court costs.

More on Illinois Supreme Court Rule 138:

© 2020 BARNES & THORNBURG LLPNational Law Review, Volume II, Number 305


About this Author

Your legal issues demand advice that is timely and sound. You expect a firm that offers integrity, reliability and a personal commitment that is aimed at one idea: finding the right solutions for the challenges and opportunities you encounter every day. 

We take the time to learn about you and your business. We staff matters with small, close-knit teams led by a fully involved partner who will keep you informed every step of the way. We keep a watchful eye on controlling legal costs.