May 28, 2022

Volume XII, Number 148

Advertisement
Advertisement

May 27, 2022

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

May 26, 2022

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

May 25, 2022

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis
Advertisement

Indiana Court of Appeals Rejects Tort Claims Acts Arguments In Dispute Over City Sewer Line

The Indiana Court of Appeals reversed a summary judgment in favor of the City of Evansville based on an untimely tort claims notice under the Tort Claims Act.

In Reed v. City of Evansville, the plaintiffs claimed that a sewer line below their house was causing mold and other problems with their property. While they learned of the sewer line in 2007, they did not file a tort claims notice until 2008. The Court held that the plaintiffs’ claims were not barred for failure to provide a timely tort claims notice. The Court held that the defects in the sewer line were subject to a discovery rule and that the plaintiffs timely gave notice after they had a reasonable opportunity to discover the issues caused by the sewer line.

While the plaintiffs knew of the sewer line well before giving notice, the Court held that the key question was whether they had reason to know of a causal connection between the sewer line and the damages to the plaintiffs’ property. It found an issue of fact as to whether the plaintiffs could have reasonably the causal connection prior to their 2008 tort claims notice. 

The case can be found online athttp://www.ai.org/judiciary/opinions/pdf/08291101mgr.pdf

© 2022 BARNES & THORNBURG LLPNational Law Review, Volume I, Number 263
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

About this Author

Mark Crandley Litigation Attorney
Partner

Appellate adviser and litigator Mark Crandley is at his best when faced with high-stakes claims that involve issues of critical importance and concern. After nearly two decades of practice, Mark knows what does and does not work. Clients and colleagues alike rely upon him for his judgement and leadership throughout the dispute resolution process.

Mark focuses his practice on appeals, constitutional and government law, commercial litigation, and the resolution of probate disputes. He has represented government entities and businesses in courts across the country, and is valued for...

317-261-7924
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement