May 22, 2019

May 21, 2019

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

May 20, 2019

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

Is It Deceptive To Lie To A Machine?

John Jenkins at TheCorporateCounsel.net writes this morning about the Securities and Exchange Commission's announcement that it has filed a civil complaint against nine defendants for hacking the EDGAR system.  The SEC's complaint alleges that these defendants used information derived from trading to engage in advantageous trading.  When the hacking was discovered a year ago, I speculated on whether hacking could be "deceptive" for purposes of Rule 10b-5:

"Typically, we think of people being misled.  Can machines be deceived?  Should or would the result be different if the hacker had instead of using a pilfered password to trick a machine had exploited a software weakness?"

According to the SEC, the alleged hacking did involve misrepresentations as an EDGAR filer and using numerous aliases to gain access.  Thus, a court may have to decide whether lying to a computer is a deceptive device for purposes of Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5.

© 2010-2019 Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP

TRENDING LEGAL ANALYSIS


About this Author

Keith Paul Bishop, Corporate Transactions Lawyer, finance securities attorney, Allen Matkins Law Firm
Partner

Keith Paul Bishop is a partner in Allen Matkins' Corporate and Securities practice group, and works out of the Orange County office. He represents clients in a wide range of corporate transactions, including public and private securities offerings of debt and equity, mergers and acquisitions, proxy contests and tender offers, corporate governance matters and federal and state securities laws (including the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the Dodd-Frank Act), investment adviser, financial services regulation, and California administrative law. He regularly advises clients...

949-851-5428