June 29, 2022

Volume XII, Number 180

Advertisement
Advertisement

June 29, 2022

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

June 28, 2022

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

June 27, 2022

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis
Advertisement

#livingwage: Is Social Media the New Frontier for Class Notice in US Wage and Hour Litigation?

In what could be the beginning of a new era in employment collective and class actions, the Southern District of New York has approved the use of social media as a mechanism to notify potential class members in a wage and hour dispute Mark v. Gawker Media LLC, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 155424 (Nov. 3, 2014 S.D.N.Y.).  The named plaintiffs, two former unpaid interns for blogs run by Gawker, initially filed the class action suit in 2013.  Plaintiffs claim that Gawker violated the Fair Labor Standards Act and New York wage laws by misclassifying them as interns instead of employees, and that Gawker therefore impermissibly failed to pay them at least minimum wage.  Traditionally, class notification is a court‑approved notice sent via U.S. mail to potential class members.  Because the potential class members were unpaid interns, Gawker did not have complete contact information – traditionally names and mailing addresses – which necessitated an alternative class mechanism.

Now that the court has decided social media can be used, the parties are presenting plans regarding the extent of the tweets, posts and blogs.  Plaintiffs took the order and ran with it, proposing use of Twitter, LinkedIn, Reddit, Facebook, and Tumblr.  Not surprisingly, Gawker took particular issue with the plan’s potential to reach potential class members multiple times using different social media sites, and to encourage back‑and‑forth exchanges between potential class members and plaintiffs’ counsel.  Regarding Twitter, Gawker balked at the plaintiffs’ proposed use of multiple hashtags, and was especially concerned with “inflammatory” hashtags such as #fairpay and #livingwage.   Gawker also objected to plaintiffs’ counsel sending announcements with reminders to group members on LinkedIn, and it requested that the court deny any use of Tumblr or Reddit (“Plaintiff’s plan with respect to Reddit is calculated less to reach potential collective members than to connect this lawsuit with unrelated controversies and political causes.”).   Although Gawker did not object to creation of a Gawker Intern Lawsuit Facebook page, it objected to plaintiffs’ request to add prospective plaintiffs as “friends.”

The New York federal court has not yet issued a ruling on the boundaries plaintiffs must adhere to in using social media.  Nonetheless, the court has already made clear that social media is not off-limits in reaching potential class members, especially where employers do not have complete contact information.  This case illustrates the need for employers to retain adequate records of employees’ and interns’ traditional contact information.

 

© Copyright 2022 Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLPNational Law Review, Volume V, Number 52
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

About this Author

Meghan E. Hill Labor & Employment Attorney Squire Patton Boggs Columbus, OH & New York, NY
Partner

Meghan Hill’s clients benefit from her holistic approach and ability to incorporate their goals and objectives when working to prevent and solve employment law problems. Meghan’s big-picture view allows her to understand all ramifications employers face when dealing with issues, as well as identify broader issues outside of employment. Meghan works with numerous diversified industrial companies and has a growing healthcare client base.

Meghan regularly represents companies in complex litigation and wage and hour collective and Rule 23 class actions in federal courts, including...

614-365-2720
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement