September 22, 2020

Volume X, Number 266

September 22, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

September 21, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

Michigan’s New Right to Work Legislation

On Tuesday, December 11, 2012 Governor Snyder signed two bills consisting of “Right to Work” legislation for Michigan. These two bills cover public sector and private sector employers in Michigan. The Public Sector Law specifically exempts state troopers and all other public police and fire employees from its provisions. With this legislation, Michigan becomes the 24th state in the country to enact Right to Work legislation. Michigan is only the 2nd state in the Midwest to do so, following Indiana’s lead from earlier this year.

The two Michigan laws will not take effect until late March or early April of 2013, 90 days after the Legislature concludes this year’s session. Both laws make it illegal for employees to be required to join or financially support a Union, even if the workforce to which the employee belongs is unionized. Neither law creates any right to a job for any employee. They simply make enforcement of a union shop clause, in a collective bargaining contract, illegal. However, in the private sector, collective bargaining contracts that extend beyond the effective date of the law would be unchanged and unaffected, until the contract expires. Michigan’s Right to Work laws do not affect the right of employees to unionize or change any other provision of a collective bargaining contract between an employer and a union.

These laws will affect the approximately 670,000 unionized employees in Michigan by allowing each employee to decide whether he or she will continue to be a member of the union that represents the employees at that workplace. Unions who represent a group of employees still retain the right and obligation to represent the entire group, including those that opt out or decide not to continue their union membership. Unions can restrict these non-members from voting in officer elections, strike votes and/or contract ratification votes, as union Constitutions specifically state that such votes are only by members.

Michigan’s Right to Work laws have no immediate effect on a non-union employer, or a workforce that is not unionized, other than possibly making such groups less attractive for unions to organize. However, as expected, this legislation has created a furor in organized labor and the Democratic Party. Leaders of those groups have promised to attempt to stop the Right to Work legislation by litigation, and political activity, including recall efforts. We will continue to monitor this situation.

Employers are allowed to explain the effect and meaning of these laws to their employees, and/or to answer questions from employees, as long as these communications do not contain threats or promises based on an employee’s union activities, sympathies, or beliefs.

© Copyright 2020 Dickinson Wright PLLCNational Law Review, Volume III, Number 3


About this Author

James Perry, Labor Attorney, Dickinson Wright Law Firm, employment litigator

James Perry is a member of our Labor & Employment Practice.  He has successfully negotiated labor contracts with major unions for a wide variety of public and private employers.  He is experienced in defense of employment litigation in federal and state government agencies and in federal and state courts.  He has significant experience before employment agencies; including NLRB, MERC, the Department of Labor, and the EEOC.