January 29, 2022

Volume XII, Number 29

Advertisement
Advertisement

January 28, 2022

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

January 27, 2022

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

January 26, 2022

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis
Advertisement

Minding Your P’s and Q’s: How to Properly Assert and Maintain the Empty Chair Defense

The “Empty Chair” defense, or so it has been called, is an affirmative defense under Ohio law that allows a defendant in a tort action to seek an allocation of fault to one or more parties that are not a party to the lawsuit under R.C. 2307.23. This is an effective tool that can be used to deflect wrongdoing to a party that is immune, like the plaintiff’s employer, for example, or a party that has already settled with the plaintiff and has been dismissed from the suit already. However, certain procedural and substantive requirements must be followed in order to properly use the Empty Chair defense.

For example, it is an affirmative defense that must be raised before trial and defendants must specifically state the person, persons, or entities for which an allocation of fault will be sought at trial. Best practice is to assert this defense in a responsive pleading like an Answer. But the requirements do not end there—a defendant must further put on evidence demonstrating tortious conduct on the part of the Empty Chair defendants. In negligence cases, this means that there must be testimony or some other admissible evidence that the non-party breached a duty owed to the plaintiff and caused them harm. This last step was overlooked by the defendants in Fairrow v. OhioHealth Corporation, resulting in a trial court refusing to allow the defendants to use the Empty Chair defense. The appellate court affirmed, holding it is not enough to simply assert the affirmative defense and seek an allocation of fault. 10th Dist. Franklin No. 19AP-828, 2020-Ohio-5595, ¶ 52. 

Defense counsel must instead proactively think about how to demonstrate tortious conduct by the Empty Chair defendant and introduce evidence of that wrongdoing at trial to ensure that the jury has the opportunity to allocate fault to non-parties under R.C. 2307.23. Failure to follow these P’s and Q’s of the Empty Chair defense will preclude a defendant from seeking an allocation of fault to a non-party and result in an unjust or disproportionate award of damages against a defendant so it is important to retain counsel that knows how to navigate these requirements. 

©2022 Roetzel & AndressNational Law Review, Volume XI, Number 180
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

About this Author

Phillip Sarnowski Attorney Transportation Retail Roetzel Columbus
Associate

Phil solves legal problems for individual companies in the transportation, retail, and insurance industries. He defends matters involving catastrophic injury, wrongful death, premises liability, product liability, insurance coverage, and toxic torts, among other areas.

As a member of Roetzel's Emergency Response Team, Phil is available around-the-clock for immediate and proactive response to trucking accidents and other catastrophic losses. He is prepared to personally handle matters from the initial rapid response call through final resolution—...

614-463-9770
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement