October 25, 2020

Volume X, Number 299

Advertisement

October 23, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

October 22, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

More Changes to CEQA Timelines due to the COVID-19 Pandemic

In response to public-health concerns associated with the COVID-19 pandemic, California Governor Gavin Newsom issued Executive Order N-54-20 (Order) on April 22, 2020. Among its provisions, the Order suspends certain noticing and California Native American tribal consultation requirements under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

SUSPENSION OF CERTAIN NOTICING REQUIREMENTS

The Order "suspends" for 60 days "public filing, posting, notice, and public access requirements" associated with the following five CEQA actions: Notice of Exemption; Notice of Intent to Adopt a Negative Declaration (ND) or Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND); Notice of Preparation of an Environmental Impact Report (EIR); Notice of Availability of a Draft EIR; and Notice of Determination after approval of a project for which an EIR, ND, or MND has been prepared.

During the 60-day suspension period, the Order appears to dispense with the requirement that lead agencies, responsible agencies, or project proponents file the above notices for physical posting by the county clerk. In lieu of the ordinary requirements, the Order mandates parties operating under these suspensions take the following actions:

  • Post such notices to the relevant agency's or applicant's public-facing website for the same period ordinarily required of physical posting in the county clerk's office;

  • Submit all such notices electronically to the State Clearinghouse; and

  • Engage in outreach to any individuals and entities known by the lead agency, responsible agency, or project applicant to be parties interested in the project in the manner otherwise contemplated by applicable provisions of CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines.

It is important to note, however, that the Order neither lengthens timelines for public review nor suspends noticing requirements altogether. Rather, it appears to temporarily suspend certain specific noticing requirements that rely upon public postings that may no longer be possible due to the closure of government buildings and social-distancing orders. Noticing otherwise required by CEQA through mail, email, publication, or posting at a project site may still be required. Furthermore, the Order does not dispense with requirements for public distribution or availability of CEQA documents other than the five specifically listed types of notices.

While the Order is not clear, it appears that the suspension of these noticing requirements applies when the time for filing a notice would fall within the 60-day suspension period. This may create some timing confusion since the time for filing these notices generally does not fall on a specific day but rather falls within a few day period.

SUSPENSION OF CERTAIN AB 52 TRIBAL CONSULTATION DEADLINES

Executive Order N-54-20 also affects the California Native American tribal consultation process under CEQA as several timelines related to this procedure "are suspended" by the Order.

Ordinarily, within 14 days of determining that an application for a project is complete or a decision by a public agency to undertake a project, the lead agency must provide formal notification to California Native American tribes that have requested notice. The tribe has 30 days from this notice to request consultation. Lead agencies then have 30 days to begin consultation proceedings after receiving a California Native American tribe’s request. Lead agencies must comply with these consultation procedural requirements in order to certify an EIR or adopt an MND for a project with a significant impact on an identified tribal cultural resource.

Unlike the CEQA notice provision of the Order, discussed above, which suspends requirements for certain noticing and specifies alternative steps to be taken in lieu of those requirements, the tribal consultation provision suspends certain "timeframes." Thus, it may be the Governor's intention to extend the time periods for the specified tribal consultation steps for the period they are suspended. If so, under the Order, tribes may have more than the statutory 30 days after receiving a lead agency's notice to request project consultation, and lead agencies may have more than 30 days to begin consultation proceedings after a tribe requests it. With these suspensions, the overall period for completion of CEQA review may be extended for some projects, although these tribal consultation timeframes occur early in the CEQA process such that the suspensions applied under the Order likely will not delay the overall development timeline for most projects.

As the Order only suspends timeframes "within which a California Native American tribe must request consultation and the lead agency must begin the consultation process," the 14-day deadline to provide formal notice to California Native American tribes is unlikely affected by the Order. As such, lead agencies should still notify tribes within 14 days of determining that an application for a project is complete or a decision by a public agency to undertake a project.

OTHER CEQA AND DEVELOPMENT PROJECT TIMELINES AFFECTED

While this Order deals narrowly with five CEQA noticing requirements and certain of the AB 52 tribal consultation timelines, the pandemic is affecting the CEQA process and development project timelines in many other ways. For example, emergency rules adopted by the California Judicial Council have extended the limitations period for bringing a CEQA challenge in court, the timelines for processing permits for development projects have become elongated in some situations, and construction restrictions are in effect in many jurisdictions.

As the Governor's emergency orders and other orders, rules, and policies during the pandemic are frequently being updated, please reach out to us with questions on how Executive Order N-54-20 or any of these other circumstances will impact specific development projects.

© 2010-2020 Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP National Law Review, Volume X, Number 122
Advertisement

TRENDING LEGAL ANALYSIS

Advertisement
Advertisement

About this Author

Barry H. Epstein Land Use and Environmental & Natural Resources Attorney Allen Matkins Law Firm San Francisco
Partner

Barry Epstein is a partner in the San Francisco office and a member of the Land Use and Environmental & Natural Resources Practice Groups. His practice focuses on energy law, water rights, land use, and natural resources, representing private and public clients in permitting, transactional and litigation matters.

Barry's energy and public utility practice involves power plant and transmission line siting and permitting in California Energy Commission and local agency venues, public utility regulation before the California Public Utilities...

(415) 273-7469
Angus C. Beverly Real Estate & Land Use Attorney Allen Matkins San Francisco, CA
Associate

Angus C. Beverly is an associate in our San Francisco office and a member of our Real Estate and Land Use groups. Angus assists clients in variety of land use and planning issues from the CEQA and NEPA review process and litigation to housing development, development agreements, Public Records Act, Coastal Act, and major public infrastructure projects.

Prior to joining Allen Matkins, Angus was an associate with Sohagi Law Group where he counseled public agencies on a variety of complex land use and environmental regulatory matters. During law school, he gained invaluable knowledge of land use and environmental law with positions such as, an externship for a real estate holding company where he worked on a major CEQA lawsuit over a mixed-use infill development, and an internship at the Los Angeles County Office of the County Counsel.

Additionally, at UCLA School of  Law, Angus served as the President of the UCLA Real Estate Law Association, was a Howard and Irene Levin Program in Housing and Social Responsibility Fellow through UCLA's Ziman Center for Real Estate and worked as an articles editor for UCLA's Journal of Environmental Law and Policy.

As an elected member of the Westwood Neighborhood Council for six years, Angus gained a variety of experience in land use and zoning matters from the perspective of public decision-makers. Prior to law school, Angus served as a policy staff assistant to Los Angeles County Supervisor, Don Knabe.

(415) 273-8412
Owen D. "Eoin" McCarron Real Estate & Environment Attorney Allen Matkins Los Angeles, CA
Associate

Owen “Eoin” McCarron employs a responsive and collaborative approach to solving problems, aiming to find creative solutions for even the most complex land use and environmental issues. Eoin provides counsel for clients in a variety of related areas, ranging from entitlements and due diligence to environmental review.

Eoin works closely with regulators and the public sector in helping clients navigate the intricate federal, state, and local regulations that govern development projects. He enjoys getting involved from the inception of major projects and providing support from the...

(213) 955-5618
Advertisement
Advertisement