August 24, 2019

August 23, 2019

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

August 22, 2019

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

August 21, 2019

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

Multiple Bills Filed in Florida Legislature to Limit or Repeal the Florida Constitution Revision Commission

As a constitutional body that meets once every 20 years, the Florida Constitution Revision Commission is garnering significant attention in the lead-up to the 2019 Florida Legislative Session. Multiple bills and joint resolutions (how constitutional amendments are proposed by the Legislature) have been filed that directly affect the Commission, and will be considered in the upcoming Florida Legislative Session that convenes March 5, 2019.

House Joint Resolution 249 was filed, along with linked House Bill 251, to repeal the existence of the Constitution Revision Commission altogether.

Other joint resolutions have been filed (House Joint Resolution 53, and Senate Joint Resolutions 74 and 86) that would limit each Commission-proposed constitutional amendment to a single subject matter.

These bills and resolutions follow a contentious 2018 process for the Commission, which placed eight proposed constitutional amendments directly on the general election ballot. Although seven of the amendments ultimately reached voters, almost all of the amendments were challenged in a number of lawsuits, including one filed by former Florida Supreme Court Justice Harry Lee Anstead. The common theme in the challenges focused on the Commission's bundling of dissimilar proposals into single ballot measures, which likely sparked the current legislative action.

Because the Constitution Revision Commission is a body created by the Florida Constitution itself, a joint resolution is required for a legislatively proposed constitutional amendment to repeal it. A joint resolution requires a three-fifths vote of both the House and the Senate to pass, but does not require the Governor's approval. If a resolution is approved, it would go on the next general election ballot. Voters then would have to approve the constitutional amendment by a 60 percent affirmative vote of all electors voting on that issue.

Of note, joint resolutions have also been filed to raise the required approval percentage for constitutional amendments from 60 percent to 66 2/3 percent.

©2011-2019 Carlton Fields, P.A.


About this Author

Aaron Dunlap, Carlton Fields, Regulatory attorney
of Counsel

Aaron Dunlap brings a multifaceted perspective to his work on behalf of land use clients, including private developers and governmental bodies. Prior to joining Carlton Fields, Aaron worked for a Florida municipality, the Florida state land planning agency, and in private practice focused on land use and zoning issues. His insider’s understanding of each party’s priorities helps him find common ground and collaborate to craft solutions that benefit his clients.

Aaron is experienced in representing clients on land use and zoning matters before elected officials and local governmental...