October 25, 2020

Volume X, Number 299

Advertisement

October 23, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

Nevada Secretary Of State Orders Halt To Sports Wagering Program

Although the State of Nevada has long been famous for its legalized gaming industry, gambling has not always been legal in the state.  In 1909, the Nevada legislature made games of chance illegal with the law taking effect in 1910.  After the collapse of the mining industry and the advent of the Great Depression, Nevada again legalized gaming in 1931.  Not all activities related to gambling, however, are legal in Nevada.  

Earlier this week, the Securities Division of the Nevada Secretary of State's office issued a Summary Order to Cease and Desist to an individual named Michael Clough, who allegedly was soliciting sports entity wagering investments under various business names, including Sports Bet Brokers, Sport Brokers, Sportivo, and Circles Network, LLC.  According to the Summary Order, the securities were in the form of notes issued in connection with an entity wagering program.  In 2015, Nevada enacted legislation allowing entity betting (somewhat akin to a gambling mutual fund).  According to the Secretary of State's Summary Order, only one sportsbook has ever been approved by the Nevada Gaming Commission to accept entity wagering.  Allegedly, that sportsbook never accepted an entity wager from the respondents.

The Summary Order includes this following allegation:

"Based upon a review of the Edgar database maintained by the Securities and Exchange
25 Commission, no Form D or other notice filing or registration was completed by any Respondent."

That allegation is misleading, at best.  However, the Securities and Exchange Commission has made clear its position that failure to file a Form D does not vitiate the availability of the exemptions under either Rule 504 or Rule 506:

"Question 257.07

Question: Is the filing of a Form D in connection with an offer or sale a condition to the availability of a Regulation D exemption for that offer or sale?

Answer: No. The filing of a Form D is a requirement of Rule 503(a), but it is not a condition to the availability of the exemption pursuant to Rule 504 or 506 of Regulation D. Rule 507 states some of the potential consequences of the failure to comply with Rule 503. [Jan. 26, 2009*]

Further, Regulation D is a non-exclusive safe harbor.

This isn't the first time that the Secretary of State's office has alleged violations of Nevada's securities laws.  See this post from last November. 

© 2010-2020 Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP National Law Review, Volume X, Number 122
Advertisement

TRENDING LEGAL ANALYSIS

Advertisement
Advertisement

About this Author

Keith Paul Bishop, Corporate Transactions Lawyer, finance securities attorney, Allen Matkins Law Firm
Partner

Keith Bishop works with privately held and publicly traded companies on federal and state corporate and securities transactions, compliance, and governance matters. He is highly-regarded for his in-depth knowledge of the distinctive corporate and regulatory requirements faced by corporations in the state of California.

While many law firms have a great deal of expertise in federal or Delaware corporate law, Keith’s specific focus on California corporate and securities law is uncommon. A former California state regulator of securities and financial institutions, Keith has decades of...

949-851-5428
Advertisement
Advertisement