April 24, 2019

April 24, 2019

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

April 23, 2019

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

April 22, 2019

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

New Jersey Law Prohibits Prospective Waivers and Secret Discrimination, Retaliation, or Harassment Settlements

On March 18, 2019, New Jersey Governor Phil Murphy signed a bill amending the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination (LAD) to prohibit contractual provisions that result in the wavier of a right or remedy provided under the LAD or prevent the disclosure of information pertaining to claims of discrimination, retaliation or harassment.   The amendment, which is immediately effective, prohibits any provision in an employment agreement, other than a collective bargaining agreement, that:

  • Waives any substantive or procedural right or remedy relating to a claim of discrimination, retaliation, or harassment; or
  • Prospectively waives any right or remedy under the LAD.

The amendment also prohibits any provision in a settlement agreement that prevents the disclosure of “details relating to a claim of discrimination, retaliation or harassment.”  Settlement agreements that resolve claims of discrimination, retaliation or harassment must include “a bold, prominently placed notice that although the parties may have agreed to keep the settlement and underlying facts confidential, such a provision in an agreement is unenforceable against the employer if the employee publicly reveals sufficient details of the claim so that the employer is reasonably identifiable.”

New Jersey employers should consider this new amendment when reviewing and updating employment contracts and anti-discrimination and harassment policies.  Any prohibited provision in an agreement entered into on or after the effective date will be considered void as a matter of public policy.  The amendment entitles current and former employees to bring a civil action to recover common law tort remedies as well as attorney fees.

The amendment should also be considered when deciding whether or not to settle claims of discrimination, retaliation or harassment.  Details surrounding allegations of such claims may no longer remain confidential, which may lead to greater reputational risk.

©2019 Epstein Becker & Green, P.C. All rights reserved.

TRENDING LEGAL ANALYSIS


About this Author

Laura Stutz, class action employment litigator, Epstein Becker Law Firm
Senior Counsel

Laura A. Stutz is a Senior Counsel in the Labor and Employment practice, in the firm's Newark office.

Ms. Stutz's class action representations have concerned challenges under federal statutes, such as the Fair Labor Standards Act as well as state statutory law (including state wage and hour laws and unfair and deceptive acts and practices statutes). Most recently, Ms. Stutz has obtained dismissal on the pleadings of a class action brought under the Equal Pay Act by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.

973-639-8536