July 30, 2021

Volume XI, Number 211

Advertisement

July 29, 2021

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

July 28, 2021

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

July 27, 2021

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis
Advertisement

New Jersey Orders DeFi Platform to Cease Offering Interest-Bearing Crypto Accounts

On July 20, 2021, New Jersey’s Acting Attorney General announced that the State’s Bureau of Securities issued a Summary Cease and Desist Order to stop BlockFi, Inc. from selling unregistered securities in the form of interest-bearing cryptocurrency accounts. While commentators frequently focus on the enforcement activities of the Securities and Exchange Commission in the crypto space, New Jersey’s action against DeFi platform BlockFi serves as a reminder that state securities regulators also actively police this marketplace.

According to the Bureau of Securities order, BlockFi, through its affiliates BlockFi Lending, LLC and BlockFi Trading, LLC, funded its cryptocurrency lending operations and proprietary trading business in part through the sale of unregistered securities in violation of the New Jersey Securities Law. The order further notes that BlockFi allowed both individual and business investors to purchase a BlockFi Interest Account by depositing certain eligible cryptocurrencies – including Bitcoin and Ethereum – into accounts at BlockFi. BlockFi then pooled the cryptocurrency deposits together to fund its cryptocurrency lending operations and proprietary trading. In exchange for investing in the BlockFi Interest Accounts, investors received interest paid monthly in cryptocurrency.

Without elaboration, the order summarily concludes that BlockFi Interest Accounts are securities under the New Jersey Securities Law.  Notably, the statutory definition of “security” in New Jersey is similar to the federal one, and includes the concept of an “investment contract.”  The order also finds that, despite advertising on its website that BlockFi is a “US regulated” entity, BlockFi failed to disclose to investors that its BlockFi Interest Accounts are not registered with the Bureau or any other securities regulator, or exempt from registration.  Additionally, the order found that BlockFi failed to make other relevant disclosures to investors about its business and operations. The order clarifies that while certain of BlockFi’s lending operations appear to be licensed under certain state lending requirements, as money service businesses or as money transmitters, these licenses were insufficient to offer securities to investors.

 

Copyright © 2021, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP. All Rights Reserved.National Law Review, Volume XI, Number 203
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

About this Author

Scott H. Kimpel Capital Markets and Securities Practice Hunton Andrews Kurth Washington, DC
Partner

Scott brings in-depth knowledge of SEC policies, procedures and enforcement philosophy to each representation.

Scott regularly advises clients across a broad sector of the economy facing sensitive reporting, compliance and enforcement matters before the Securities and Exchange Commission and other capital markets regulators. His practice encompasses a wide range of matters involving the securities laws, mergers and acquisitions, corporate governance, regulatory enforcement, administrative law and public policy. Scott also leads the firm’s working group on blockchain and distributed...

202-955-1524
Advertisement
Advertisement