June 6, 2023

Volume XIII, Number 157


June 06, 2023

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

June 04, 2023

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

New York City Enacts Amendments to New York City Fair Chance Act

Following Mayor Bill de Blasio’s non-action on the bill passed by the New York City Council in December expanding the scope of New York City’s Fair Chance Act (FCA), the amendments have become law. The amendments, which go into effect in late-July, significantly expand employment protections for applicants and employees with criminal charges or arrests.

Existing Requirements

New York City’s FCA, which became effective on October 27, 2015, generally prohibits New York City employers from making an inquiry about an applicant’s criminal conviction record until after a conditional offer of employment had been extended and requires employers to balance numerous factors (FCA factors) as part of their analysis of the job-relatedness of the conviction. The FCA also prohibits employers from searching publicly available sources to obtain information about an applicant’s criminal history prior to a conditional offer. For details, see our article, New York City Enacts Ban-the-Box Legislation.

New Requirements

The amendments to the FCA include the following key new obligations:

  • Requires employers to solicit information on all FCA factors as part of their job-related analysis.

  • Requires employers to engage in a job-related analysis before disqualifying an applicant or taking an adverse job action based on an employee’s pending criminal offense and may make a disqualification decision only if it concludes there is: (i) a direct relationship between the alleged wrongdoing that is the subject of the pending arrest or criminal accusation and the employment sought or held; or (ii) the granting or continuation of the employment would involve an unreasonable risk to property or the safety or welfare of specific individuals or the general public.

  • Requires employers to consider a series of factors similar to those an employer already must utilize in determining the job-relatedness of a criminal conviction in evaluating whether to revoke a conditional offer or take an adverse employment action against an employee based on a pending criminal matter. The significant difference between these factors and the factors for evaluating criminal convictions is that: (i) for convictions, the employer must analyze the length of time since the offense, but for pending matters, the employer must consider whether the applicant is age 25 or younger at the time of the offense; and (ii) for convictions, the employer must consider evidence of rehabilitation or good conduct, but for pending matters employers must consider “any additional information produced by the applicant or employee, or produced on their behalf, in regards to their rehabilitation or good conduct, including history of positive performance and conduct on the job or in the community, or other evidence of good conduct.”

  • Requires employers to follow the FCA process for a pending criminal matter and provide a notice setting forth the substantive basis for any disqualification decision and review any responsive information timely submitted by the applicant or employee.

  • Requires employers to engage in the same job-related analysis for convictions occurring during employment as it already is obligated to do for convictions that occurred pre-employment.

  • Prohibits employers from making any inquiries related to non-pending arrests and criminal accusations, adjournments in contemplation of dismissal, youthful offender adjudications, or convictions sealed pursuant to certain sections of the criminal procedural law. Currently, the law prohibits only consideration of such information.

  • Prohibits employers from making inquiries or basing any employment actions on violations and non-criminal offenses.

The amendments also codify an existing rule that an employer can revoke a conditional offer only based on criminal information reviewed after all other screening and background checks have been completed.


Finally, the legislation codifies that an employer may act on a misrepresentation regarding criminal background made by the applicant or employee, as long as the inquiry was lawful and the applicant is provided a copy of the documents supporting the employer’s position and is given an opportunity to respond.

Jackson Lewis P.C. © 2023National Law Review, Volume XI, Number 12

About this Author

Richard Greenberg, Jackson Lewis, workplace grievances lawyer, arbitrations litigation attorney

Richard Greenberg is a Principal in the New York City, New York, office of Jackson Lewis P.C. He advises both unionized and union-free clients on a full-range of labor and employee relations matters.

With respect to traditional labor matters, Mr. Greenberg represents clients in collective bargaining negotiations, labor disputes, grievances and arbitrations, proceedings before the National Labor Relations Board, and in state and federal court. Mr. Greenberg also advises clients on the legal aspects of remaining union-free....

Daniel J. Jacobs, Jackson Lewis law firm, Labor Employment Attorney

Daniel J. Jacobs is a Shareholder in the New York City, New York, office of Jackson Lewis P.C. He assists both unionized and union-free clients with a full-range of labor and employee relations matters.
With respect to traditional labor matters, Mr. Jacobs represents clients in collective bargaining negotiations, contingency planning, labor...

Susan M. Corcoran, Jackson Lewis, fair credit reporting lawyer, Labor Policy Attorney

Susan M. Corcoran is a Principal in the White Plains, New York, office of Jackson Lewis, P.C. Ms. Corcoran is a seasoned employment counselor and litigator and is often thought of as the “go to” person on national workplace law issues for her clients.

She is one of the leaders of the firm’s Background Check Resource Group, and serves as a resource on fair credit reporting act issues, as well as “ban the box” strategies. She taught a graduate employment law class for many years at Manhattanville College and frequently speaks...

Anna Broccolo employment litigation lawyer Jackson Lewis

Anna K. Broccolo is an Associate in the New York City, New York office of Jackson Lewis P.C. Her practice focuses on representing management in employment litigation, as well as advising clients on all aspects of the employment relationship.

Ms. Broccolo’s employment litigation practice includes defending employers against claims of discrimination, retaliation, disability accommodation, wage and hour violations, breach of contract, wrongful termination, and enforcement and defense of non-compete and non-solicitation agreements. Ms. Broccolo also counsels her...